- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 66,859
- Reaction score
- 30,124
- Location
- Rolesville, NC
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Marriage is not a right. So your poll is skewed.
Interesting opinion. Care to explain your reasoning for that statement?
Find it in the constitution.
Find it in the constitution.
I was pretty clear before, marriage is a one man and one woman. Period.I'm looking for how you drew your conclusion. What do you think constitutes a right? And if not a right, what do you define marriage as?
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. Yet, at least. I'm not even sure what side of this issue you're on. I just think this is an interesting perspective on the debate I haven't heard yet, and am glad that at least one person isn't beating a dead horse on this thread.
Where does it say same sex marriage specifically?14th Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, 5th Amendment, Due Process Clause
The SCOTUS has ruled on this many times.
14 Supreme Court Cases: Marriage is a Fundamental Right | American Foundation for Equal Rights
"Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923): The right “to marry, establish a home and bring up children” is a central part of liberty protected by the Due Process Clause."
Oh and let us not forget the 9th Amendment which specifically states that states that rights do not have to be specifically stated in the Constitution to be retained by the people.
Where does it say same sex marriage specifically?
I was pretty clear before, marriage is a one man and one woman. Period.
Marriage is not a right. So your poll is skewed.
You still don't understand, it was written for man woman marriages.Sorry, didn't want to backlog through 554 posts. What a lot of people on the forum have been pointing out recently is that one of the major perks to marriage is that it simplifies possible complications to inheritance and childcare in the case of a parent's death. What's your response that argument?
You still don't understand, it was written for man woman marriages.
Gays can do legal things like trusts and wills just like anyone. That should be good enough.
Find it in the constitution.
You still don't understand, it was written for man woman marriages.
Gays can do legal things like trusts and wills just like anyone. That should be good enough.
I was pretty clear before, marriage is a one man and one woman. Period.
You still don't understand, it was written for man woman marriages.
Gays can do legal things like trusts and wills just like anyone. That should be good enough.
you are free to have that meanignless opinion and the great thing about rights and freedom, gays being granted equal rights wont effect your freedom to have your opinion. You get to keep it. Its a shame your views dont value that though.
Oh, so my opinion is meaningless. OK, so is yours.
Oh, so my opinion is meaningless. OK, so is yours.
If we could take the vibe on this thread and put it in a bottle, we would have an incredibly deadly poison.
No shame at all, marriage is a man and a woman. Period not exceptions. Anything else is a joke.yes your opinion about marriage being man and woman only
and yes i agree any opinion i have are meaningless to facts and rights, can you qoute me giving you any of my opinions to you?
oh thats right i ddint lol only facts and pointed out the fallacies of your posts.
Like I said its a shame your views dont value equal rights and freedom
No shame at all, marriage is a man and a woman. Period not exceptions. Anything else is a joke.
No shame at all, marriage is a man and a woman. Period not exceptions. Anything else is a joke.
You still don't understand, it was written for man woman marriages.
Gays can do legal things like trusts and wills just like anyone. That should be good enough.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?