If I was Straight, I'd have to Get Gay

[Exquisitor]

If I was Straight, I'd have to Get Gay:

Alito Renews Threat to Overturn Marriage Equality | Common Dreams

"Overturning Obergefell is on their bucket list," said one journalist.

www.commondreams.org

Maybe I should go get some, nah, too messy, I'd screw it up and get in trouble.

Now look at that face, isn't that the look of central scrutinizer itself?

 

[Phys251]

If I was Straight, I'd have to Get Gay:

Alito Renews Threat to Overturn Marriage Equality | Common Dreams

"Overturning Obergefell is on their bucket list," said one journalist.

www.commondreams.org

Maybe I should go get some, nah, too messy, I'd screw it up and get in trouble.

Now look at that face, isn't that the look of central scrutinizer itself?

View attachment 67493995

Of course it's on their list. It's right up there with overturning IVF and birth control. Obviously these are the issues that will improve America.

 

[bomberfox]

**** Alito. We’re not giving up what we fought for.

 

[CLAX1911]

If I was Straight, I'd have to Get Gay:

Alito Renews Threat to Overturn Marriage Equality | Common Dreams

"Overturning Obergefell is on their bucket list," said one journalist.

www.commondreams.org

Maybe I should go get some, nah, too messy, I'd screw it up and get in trouble.

Now look at that face, isn't that the look of central scrutinizer itself?

View attachment 67493995

This is a bizarre attempt to connect to completely unrelated things.

The questions you ask in jury selection are not based on who has the right to marry.

I remember serving on a jury and I was asked about my views on chiropractic I was removed because I said it was garbage and chiropractors are really just masseuses not doctors.

Overturning Hodges would have no effect on this whatsoever.

People should be recused if they have a biased toward either the defendant or the plaintiff in a trial.

 

[Lisa]

He whining because people call conservative Christians bigots.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is expressing concern that Americans who hold what he calls “traditional religious views” on homosexuality and refuse to hide them are being labeled as “bigots.” The Bush-appointed 73-year old jurist with a history of anti-LGBTQ opinions has been called the Court’s “staunchest opponent of LGBTQ rights.”
As The New Republic reports, “Alito is complaining that people who oppose homosexuality were being unfairly branded as bigots, despite that being a dictionary definition of bigotry.”


On Tuesday, agreeing the Court should not take a case, Alito wrote he is “concerned” that a lower court’s reasoning “may spread.”


He notes that the lower court “reasoned that a person who still holds traditional religious views on questions of sexual morality is presumptively unfit to serve on a jury in a case involving a party who is a lesbian.”





In that case, several jurors who acknowledged they held anti-LGBTQ views were released from serving on the trial.


“That holding exemplifies the danger that I anticipated in Obergefell v. Hodges … namely, that Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be ‘labeled as bigots and treated as such’ by the government.'”

MSN

 

[Exquisitor]

Of course it's on their list. It's right up there with overturning IVF and birth control. Obviously these are the issues that will improve America.

Ya, more progeny to mate with the refugees.

 

[Exquisitor]

**** Alito. We’re not giving up what we fought for.

I'm tied up with Mike Johnson, you go ahead.

 

[CLAX1911]

He whining because people call conservative Christians bigots.

MSN

It dumber than that. He's whining because lawyers are making jury selections based on bias which is what jury selection is about.

I was not selected for a jury because I didn't believe chiropractic was real medicine.

 

[GIJane]

This is a bizarre attempt to connect to completely unrelated things.

The questions you ask in jury selection are not based on who has the right to marry.

I remember serving on a jury and I was asked about my views on chiropractic I was removed because I said it was garbage and chiropractors are really just masseuses not doctors.

Overturning Hodges would have no effect on this whatsoever.

People should be recused if they have a biased toward either the defendant or the plaintiff in a trial.

Without the happy ending.