• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If i had money to get the lawyers, my case against the supreme court - non violent revolution

After about 200 houndred years is when republics tend to go down hill, economic struggles tend to be the first symptom.

As to the swiss, large republics tend to have a lot of issues.
It America hhe big figu is lgbtq and the Christian party(unconstitutional but shill in our politics yay), the right vs the lgbtq and lastly the right vs minoritys, and half is desigised as a right v left fight. Neather side can make progression cuz it sea saws fcom presedency to presedency, and sometimes depending on n Congress, the president in a joke that cant do shit. (Obama first term was not worth calling a term, and while his actions set ' dangerous precedent in regards to executive orders vs Congress, had no real choice.

With the cantions splitting territories, the issues jone Adams described to the american political system end up moot, with a over reaching constitution governing what hhe cantons can and can't do, it might last longer.

Though my concern with that is can it keep up a constant government and policy to last, with thure banking and neutrality agreements, im not to concerned with invasion for the most part.


Were i got it? Hears a quote "learn your history are you will repeat it." I got five thousand years worth of data points swimming in my head.


I have been consuming historp cents i was six and am autistic, autistics understand patterns and data points, all you got in this debat is a hem and haw that means nothing.

You ask for link and i give, i show my reffrences and you miss the point harder than a blind veh at a shooting range.
 
After about 200 houndred years is when republics tend to go down hill, economic struggles tend to be the first symptom.

Nonsense

Which republics do you think only lasted about 200 years ?

Do not try and bring up examples of "republics" from antiquity and instead stick to modern history.

As to the swiss, large republics tend to have a lot of issues.

So Switzerland has not had any issues because it is not "large" enough ?

Just what is your criteria for a "large" republic ?

It America hhe big figu is lgbtq and the Christian party....

WTF ????

With the cantions splitting territories, the issues jone Adams described to the american political system end up moot, with a over reaching constitution governing what hhe cantons can and can't do, it might last longer.

The US republic is well over 200 years old and still going strong

But I wonder why is is you think republics are inherently short lived than monarchies.
 
Nonsense

Which republics do you think only lasted about 200 years ?

Do not try and bring up examples of "republics" from antiquity and instead stick to modern history.



So Switzerland has not had any issues because it is not "large" enough ?

Just what is your criteria for a "large" republic ?



WTF ????



The US republic is well over 200 years old and still going strong

But I wonder why is is you think republics are inherently short lived than monarchies.
I can't debate with anyone that dose not understand nor can read links.

Switzerland might sast longer because each canton alows flexibility in politics between sectors, thus the issues of the right vs the left in america would not be the issue it is.


Also your a trump supporter ard obviously racist, bigated and sexist. My evidence? You think this country is fine and every thing is okay. While Caesar is litterly trying to take over the government of america

If your non of those things then your blind and ignorant and also a wast of time.


If your neither then your a troll.


Was going to say im sorry for my attitude yesterday, but after reading this, i dont know why i thought i was too harsh.
 
I can't debate with anyone that dose not understand nor can read links.

No, you mean you can't debate with anyone who actually knows something about politics and can call out your posts for the BS they are.

Switzerland might sast longer because each canton alows flexibility in politics between sectors, thus the issues of the right vs the left in america would not be the issue it is.

Go on then, please give an example of this "flexibility" that the Swiss Republics have that other republics do not

I won't hold my breath.

Also your a trump supporter ard obviously racist, bigated and sexist.

I think you mean "you are" or "you're"

And no I am not, I absolutely abhor Trump and all he stands for - as perhaps a glace at my details might suggest ?

As for your other accusations, I shall report them as unfounded slander.

My evidence? You think this country is fine and every thing is okay. While Caesar is litterly trying to take over the government of america

There is a lot wrong with US politics - Trump has polarized political opinion like in no other democracy
What he is doing is undoubtedly harmful to to USA. Then again former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair caused a lot of damage to the UK, during his premiership, with his stupid policies. But the UK is still intact.

But Trump presents no danger to the US republic, not even close.

If your non of those things then your blind and ignorant and also a wast of time.

*You are
** waste

No, you posting on here is a waste of your time, that would be better spent in English classes.
 
Least i know the ablist comment is in fact true.

Also i did link the flexibility of the swiss and also quoted it, pulled it apart and everything, so you just proved you did not read the links.
 
Atf and the dea also violet our 9th amendment right, womens autonomy violet that right.

Any right not listed there in, dose not negate the fact that right exist.
 
Least i know the ablist comment is in fact true.

No you don't.

Also i did link the flexibility of the swiss and also quoted it, pulled it apart and everything, so you just proved you did not read the links.

You made a claim that "Switzerland might sast [SIC]longer because each canton alows [SIC] flexibility in politics between sectors"

But when I challenged you to give an example of this "flexibility" that the Swiss Republics have that other republics do not, the silence was defeaning.


Atf and the dea also violet our 9th amendment right, womens autonomy violet that right.

You and the English language really are strangers aren't you ?

I think you mean that the ATF and the DEA violate the 9th amendment
And women's autonomy also violates it ?

Go on the, give examples:
1. The ATF violating the 9th Amendment
2. The DEA violating the 9th Amendment
3. Women's autonomy violating the 9th Amendment ? (or did you mean the ATF and DEA violating women's autonomy?)

Any right not listed there in, dose not negate the fact that right exist.

Seriously is English not your 1st language ?

Do you mean, that there are other rights not detailed in the 9th Amendment ?
 
After about 200 houndred years is when republics tend to go down hill, economic struggles tend to be the first symptom.

As to the swiss, large republics tend to have a lot of issues.
It America hhe big figu is lgbtq and the Christian party(unconstitutional but shill in our politics yay), the right vs the lgbtq and lastly the right vs minoritys, and half is desigised as a right v left fight. Neather side can make progression cuz it sea saws fcom presedency to presedency, and sometimes depending on n Congress, the president in a joke that cant do shit. (Obama first term was not worth calling a term, and while his actions set ' dangerous precedent in regards to executive orders vs Congress, had no real choice.

With the cantions splitting territories, the issues jone Adams described to the american political system end up moot, with a over reaching constitution governing what hhe cantons can and can't do, it might last longer.

Though my concern with that is can it keep up a constant government and policy to last, with thure banking and neutrality agreements, im not to concerned with invasion for the most part.


Were i got it? Hears a quote "learn your history are you will repeat it." I got five thousand years worth of data points swimming in my head.


I have been consuming historp cents i was six and am autistic, autistics understand patterns and data points, all you got in this debat is a hem and haw that means nothing.

You ask for link and i give, i show my reffrences and you miss the point harder than a blind veh at a shooting range.
If it was defending, then you must be deff. Or clinically dumb.
 
"Power struggles and frequent assassinations plagued the empire, creating a climate of uncertainty. Emperors would rise and fall, often through violent means, leading to a lack of stability and consistent leadership. The weakening of the Senate's influence and the rise of autocratic rule further eroded the empire's political foundations. Corruption and the lack of effective leadership eroded the authority of the central government and contributed to instability

To make matters worse, probably the first pandemic ever recorded wreaked havoc across the Roman Empire."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Power struggles and frequent assassinations plagued the empire, creating a climate of uncertainty."

With modern guns and security its rather hard for the assassination thing to effect us, and still we already suffered 2 and a few attempts at it, and Lincoln's death deffently negativity effect American politics.

"Emperors would rise and fall, often through violent means, leading to a lack of stability and consistent leadership."

This is ' problem that really started after the assassination of president Kennedy, only real difference from america Vs Rome; the 2 term limits that was amended into the constitution and political divide; (half a left over from Lincoln mess, dead his works to rebuild was wasted and caused lasting impacts on our society.) as left us politically with no stability nor any ceal consistent leadership.

"The weakening of the Senate's influence and the rise of autocratic rule further eroded the empire's political foundations. Corruption and the lack of effective leadership eroded the authority of the central government and contributed to instability"

This hits differently for america, corpocracy not autocratic rule is whats messing us up, sents Rockefeller. Senet is not working for us, err Congress in our case, but they weakened the presedency power with two term limits and cutting its size, with corporate funding and influence, there representation is going to the corporation and not the people.

Okay thats a half of americas fascination with repeating romen history.
So do you now accept that the Roman empire was NOT a republic - as you previously and falsely stated ?



No, Germany is a republic and is well run by any metric you want to use.



Poland is also a stable democracy and a republic.



Yes the French
Since the creation of the 5th Republic in 1945 (some 80 years ago) it has been a very stable democratic republic.



About 100 years old - what is your criteria for "infancy"
Is the US republic in its "infancy" in your opinion ?



You really don't know much about politics do you ?
Can you even say what the difference between a Constitutional Monarchy and a Constitutional Republic is.



Says who ? (apart from you that is)
And you cant even critically exam or discreted my work. I litterly listed my data points, do you manh? Or did you get a F?
 
No you don't.



You made a claim that "Switzerland might sast [SIC]longer because each canton alows [SIC] flexibility in politics between sectors"

But when I challenged you to give an example of this "flexibility" that the Swiss Republics have that other republics do not, the silence was defeaning.




You and the English language really are strangers aren't you ?

I think you mean that the ATF and the DEA violate the 9th amendment
And women's autonomy also violates it ?

Go on the, give examples:
1. The ATF violating the 9th Amendment
2. The DEA violating the 9th Amendment
3. Women's autonomy violating the 9th Amendment ? (or did you mean the ATF and DEA violating women's autonomy?)



Seriously is English not your 1st language ?

Do you mean, that there are other rights not detailed in the 9th Amendment ?
I mean you dont know the constitution. The ninth protects any right not listed in the twelve amendments.

Basically by its inclusion, it defends the idea of liberty, from its 1700 meaning, not the modern English.
It by its inclusion not only make our constitution a legal framework but also one of pholosophy on the ideas of the self, and what it means to be liberated.

I understand my constitution better then you' cuz i understand the ideas that wort it, red the fathers papers, the debates.
The concerns they dad with the system they built got Hamilton killed in a honer dule.
Codified after heavy considerations and debats, and so many disagreements.


Did you read all the copies of the declaration of independence, not just the one codified in Washington?



Also **** both colin and webster, may a rabid dog piss on there graves.
 
I mean you dont know the constitution.

I know the US Constitution far better than you do.

The ninth protects any right not listed in the twelve amendments.

12 amendments ?
Do you mean the TEN amendments that are colloquially called the "Bill of Rights" ?

If a right is not specified in law, it does not exist.

Also **** both colin and webster, may a rabid dog piss on there graves.

Possessive plural: their.
 
I know the US Constitution far better than you do.



12 amendments ?
Do you mean the TEN amendments that are colloquially called the "Bill of Rights" ?

If a right is not specified in law, it does not exist.



Possessive plural: t
[/URL]

Dolt
 
Last edited:
Pepole forget the laws of nature, and the fact it was not codified is a baffle me, but besides that concept is in the declaration, and thats a living document,f intent.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.




Two houndred years sure did diminish the word liberty in the dictionary.




Wake up.
 

So you admit you got it wrong and you mean the TEN amendments of the Bill of Rights ?

What was that about not knowing the Constitution ?


Pepole forget the laws of nature, and the fact it was not codified is a baffle me, but besides that concept is in the declaration, and thats a living document,f intent.

"Laws of Nature" now ???????

LMAO - go on then: what are these "Laws of Nature" ?

Two houndred years sure did diminish the word liberty in the dictionary.

The word "Liberty" means the same today as it did 200 years ago.
 
So you admit you got it wrong and you mean the TEN amendments of the Bill of Rights ?

What was that about not knowing the Constitution ?




"Laws of Nature" now ???????

LMAO - go on then: what are these "Laws of Nature" ?



The word "Liberty" means the same today as it did 200 years ago.
Please go back to school please.
 
Back
Top Bottom