• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

IDF Complicit In Illegal Israeli Settler Violence ?

oneworld2

Handsome Pitbull
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
28,141
Reaction score
6,764
Location
UK
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
=AJ]

Israeli settler attacks have consistently been rising for the past six years. Attacks on villages in the Nablus area, where there is a heavy settler concentration, have been increasing and becoming more organised over the past year.

Many of these incidents have been recorded on video that shows the attacks taking place under the protection or in coordination with the Israeli army, sometimes with soldiers and settlers shooting side by side.


In a statement on December 15, the United Nations said, “2022 is the sixth year of consecutive annual increase in the number of Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank.”


I've also included a link (below) to the Israeli Human Rights group B'tselem which has many videos showing IDF supported settler violence against the Palestinians of the West Bank.


With the recent settler pogrom against Palestinians living in and around Nablus , which again produced the same footage of IDF settler collusion in these attacks, are we to take seriously any state actions to be taken against these people?

The right wing govt of Israel today is heavily connected with settler violence and so international calls for action to stop the violence seem at best naïve at worse a wilful ignorance of the situation there.
 

I've also included a link (below) to the Israeli Human Rights group B'tselem which has many videos showing IDF supported settler violence against the Palestinians of the West Bank.


With the recent settler pogrom against Palestinians living in and around Nablus , which again produced the same footage of IDF settler collusion in these attacks, are we to take seriously any state actions to be taken against these people?

The right wing govt of Israel today is heavily connected with settler violence and so international calls for action to stop the violence seem at best naïve at worse a wilful ignorance of the situation there.
I see no evidence of IDF collusion
 

I've also included a link (below) to the Israeli Human Rights group B'tselem which has many videos showing IDF supported settler violence against the Palestinians of the West Bank.


With the recent settler pogrom against Palestinians living in and around Nablus , which again produced the same footage of IDF settler collusion in these attacks, are we to take seriously any state actions to be taken against these people?

The right wing govt of Israel today is heavily connected with settler violence and so international calls for action to stop the violence seem at best naïve at worse a wilful ignorance of the situation there.

I stand with the Freedom Fighters on this issue.

Viva lePalestine!!!
 
I'm open to seeing the evidence. Got any?

No you are not. You will do a Nelson " I see no ships" even if the evidence is so overwhelming you can't breathe due to the weight of it.
 
No you are not. You will do a Nelson " I see no ships" even if the evidence is so overwhelming you can't breathe due to the weight of it.
If you don't have any evidence then the claim is dismissed
 
If you don't have any evidence then the claim is dismissed

The evidence was supplied by a link in the OP and so has already been provided. Additionally, as already stated, no amount of evidence would force a change of you position, which is one of extreme bias. As with other people of a similar nature, what was never reasoned in will never be reasoned out, so you can quit pretending you have anything like an open mind on this subject and stop wasting peoples time asking for evidence you fully intend to ignore anyhow.
 
The evidence was supplied by a link in the OP and so has already been provided. Additionally, as already stated, no amount of evidence would force a change of you position, which is one of extreme bias. As with other people of a similar nature, what was never reasoned in will never be reasoned out, so you can quit pretending you have anything like an open mind on this subject and stop wasting peoples time asking for evidence you fully intend to ignore anyhow.
Such evidence must be presented in a court of law. I don't see it
 
Such evidence must be presented in a court of law. I don't see it

:rolleyes:

You will NEVER see it regardless of where and when it is exhibited, that's kind of your deal.

My guess is you haven't even looked at the links provided to support the assertion.
 
:rolleyes:

You will NEVER see it regardless of where and when it is exhibited, that's kind of your deal.

My guess is you haven't even looked at the links provided to support the assertion.
Well if you don't have the evidence you don't have it


Dismissed
 
Back
Top Bottom