Plutocrats have been successfully waging war on America a very long time, and especially winning since Reagan, basically controlling all of the Republican politicians and a large party of the Democrats, easily holding a majority which is all that matters.
As I look in history about when American democracy has 'functioned as intended', it's rare. We had the progressive movement circa 1900, women's suffrage, prohibition for and against, labor rights, the last successful popular uprising was the environmental movement when the EPA and endangered species acts were passed, and then the last was the unsuccessful 'no nukes' movement.
It seemed that as our government became owned by the plutocrats, as our media became owned by a handful of mega corporations, that it was harder and harder for the public to organize a big movement. The main one we saw was the plutocrat-backed Tea Party movement. Whoop de doo.
A smaller effort came with the Occupy movement, that seemed to prove the point how unable the public was to organize and take charge of an issue.
And then, suddenly, we have this civil rights police abuse movement that came out of nowhere, and seems to be effectively influencing the country. Wow. I'm impressed. I don't know what role the virus and economic crash might have played in making protest easier, but either way, it's a real populist movement it seems. And it's good to see.
Now, if only we could do better at movements around plutocracy and healthcare. But we just showed we can't right now, or Bernie would have won. But I'm glad to see the public organizing, not something the plutocrats or media are pushing for their own benefit. It's still way too hard, there are still too many obstacles, but I'll admit it's more than I thought was likely to happen.
Plutocrats have been successfully waging war on America a very long time, and especially winning since Reagan, basically controlling all of the Republican politicians and a large party of the Democrats, easily holding a majority which is all that matters.
As I look in history about when American democracy has 'functioned as intended', it's rare. We had the progressive movement circa 1900, women's suffrage, prohibition for and against, labor rights, the last successful popular uprising was the environmental movement when the EPA and endangered species acts were passed, and then the last was the unsuccessful 'no nukes' movement.
It seemed that as our government became owned by the plutocrats, as our media became owned by a handful of mega corporations, that it was harder and harder for the public to organize a big movement. The main one we saw was the plutocrat-backed Tea Party movement. Whoop de doo.
A smaller effort came with the Occupy movement, that seemed to prove the point how unable the public was to organize and take charge of an issue.
And then, suddenly, we have this civil rights police abuse movement that came out of nowhere, and seems to be effectively influencing the country. Wow. I'm impressed. I don't know what role the virus and economic crash might have played in making protest easier, but either way, it's a real populist movement it seems. And it's good to see.
Now, if only we could do better at movements around plutocracy and healthcare. But we just showed we can't right now, or Bernie would have won. But I'm glad to see the public organizing, not something the plutocrats or media are pushing for their own benefit. It's still way too hard, there are still too many obstacles, but I'll admit it's more than I thought was likely to happen.
You do realize the Plutocracy is paying for all these protests and the damage they have caused.
You do realize the Plutocracy is paying for all these protests and the damage they have caused.
Not really. What’s in it for them?
Profits
And it's good to see.
.
Huh? How would the CEO of Wendy’s, for example, benefit from the looting of his stores?
Not really. What’s in it for them?
That's nice. Would that it were true. :roll:
In reality, the plutocracy will profit off the unrest, most likely by lending money for the rebuild, which will then be repaid by future generations in never-ending interest payments since no one will ever be able to pay off the principle on $25T in debt.
You do realize the Plutocracy is paying for all these protests and the damage they have caused.
Ask Soros and the other NWO globalists.
The Plutocracy has mucho dinero, money to burn.
Whoever it is that is behind the violence is very well off and very well organized. Could it be that George Soros works for or with the CIA or Mossad?
Not really. What’s in it for them?
IMO, it's actually a shift in supply and demand from the 70's which boosted the plutocrat. As labor became less valuable due to foreign competition and automation, capital increased in value. Add to that the financialization of our economy, where we went from tax and spend to borrow and spend more, and we can see why the people with the cash now call the shots.
it keeps us divided so they can continue their globalist dreams
So wait: they want to divide the globe to unite it?
Huh? How would the CEO of Wendy’s, for example, benefit from the looting of his stores?
Business benefits from stability and order. Riots and looting are not good for business.
The point Calamity was making was that CEOs of banks and other lending institutions will profit off it. Wendy's will perhaps just 'recover,' which still means a s*** ton of cash for the CEO.
How are Soros and the globalists benefitting from the protests? And why would, for example, the CEOs of Wendy’s or Ford be in on it?
It seems like there's a lot of confusion here. Plutocracy is mostly a separate issue from the protests. The protests are grass-roots actions about police behavior. They have little to nothing to do with plutocrats or profits of anyone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?