- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 59,261
- Reaction score
- 30,256
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
An authoritarian firing everyone loyal to the country rather than to them leads to a government of corruption and incompetence (and abuse of power)m as we see across the trump admin. While reading the comments to a story about Tulsi Gabbard posting an agent name online, a user mentioned the following story. I'll post the Google AI summary.
Reports in August 2025 revealed that the Trump administration awarded a $1.2 billion contract to build and operate an immigrant detention facility at Fort Bliss to a small, inexperienced Virginia company. The contract has drawn widespread criticism due to the contractor's lack of experience with such large-scale projects and concerns about transparency...
- Contract value: The Department of Defense (DOD) initially announced a $232 million award. However, it is part of a larger contract valued at up to $1.2 billion. The total amount was first reported by Bloomberg, and the initial DOD announcement funded the first 1,000 beds of the complex, which is expected to house up to 5,000 migrants.
- Contractor: The contract was awarded to Acquisition Logistics LLC, which is a small, veteran-owned, and Hispanic-owned business based in Henrico, Virginia.
- Lack of experience: The company had not previously won a federal contract larger than $16 million and has no listed experience managing a corrections facility.
- Home-based operations: The company's listed headquarters is a residential home in a suburban Richmond neighborhood.
- No website: At the time of reporting, the company either had no public website or its website was listed as "down for maintenance," making it difficult to find public information about its capabilities.
- Lack of transparency: The Pentagon and the Trump administration have refused to provide details on why Acquisition Logistics was selected over the many other bidders.
- Investigations and controversy: The contract has led to two investigations, contract disputes, and a legal appeal filed by a competing bidder. The secrecy and decision-making process behind the award have raised "legitimate questions" about the contract, according to federal contracting experts.