• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I, Robot , got a job

soap box said:
That's the most interesting post so far, and I believe the most incorrect. But very interesting.

The creative process includes the artist being their own evaluator. And evaluation is the part I don't believe will ever be coded.

Tom Waites writes a song. The next day he comes back and plays it again and he decides it's not good enough, and he moves on to something else. Why did he abandon his own creation?

Compare that to AI, which can create sound patterns that we recognize as music, but the AI model cannot like or dislike the music it made. People might like it or not, but the computer can't tell.

This is about how an AI detector works. When a detector realizes it's reading something that should make sense but the AI model finds it incomprehensible, it will be declared a human product.

Read this story and see if you can tell why an AI detector can tell a human wrote it.

docs.google.com

The King and His Butter

The King and His Butter Every sunrise the King came down to the dining room. He had bread and butter before breakfast, but one day his morning was very different. “Bleck!” he said, “the butter tastes terrible! Something is awful and I must find out why this is happening.” He looked at the que...
docs.google.com docs.google.com

This is saying a computer can read, but it can't be entertained. AI can contribute to the creative process, but it needs humans to steer the process and evaluate what is produced.
Click to expand...
It’s only getting better though, I wouldn’t be surprised if in a couple of years an AI wins a literary prize. My be they case need a Human as a front man for it but I don’t see why not it’s improving all the time
 
soap box said:
Is there a job that a robot will never be able to do? Is there any job that will never be replaced? I think I could be replaced by a bot, I might retire before it happens.

There are 2 discussions of what is happening in AI now compared to capabilities in the future. A discussion about the level now is based on facts. The future is necessarily not a fact. The question is like "what is and what should never be."

This is about ten or twenty years from now, my question is about the future.
My answer is yes,

Do you think they can make a bot good enough to replace you in the next twenty years? Surely , someone has a job now that will still be a job in 2044.


ethical considerations, and the societal impact of AI technologies
Click to expand...
There are a lot of jobs humans must do, especially in service. Karen feels good when she has a human to shout at - even better if she can reduce some girl to tears or threaten someone's job. She's not going to take her business to a place where there are machines immune to her vitriol. No buzz factor.
 
AI still hallucinates and gets things wrong. That has to be fixed first, in order to make it more reliable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom