When he lacks the integrity to stand by his own words that's a red flag.
I really think with him even with all the pomp and circumstance it's just you're on the wrong team so you must be wrong.Broad assertions likely cribbed from the fetid swamps of the Gun Control Industry. No arguments to support them..in fact, a refusal to support them in most cases. The Gun Control Industry would see a better cost/benefit ratio by employing a bot.
I really think with him even with all the pomp and circumstance it's just you're on the wrong team so you must be wrong.
It's gun control for spite.
I'm quite glad he's posting because it's not about talking to him talking to him is about whoever is watching. You'll never convince him he's a zealot but you can't expose his inconsistency.If his arguments on other topics are as inept as his (mostly non-existent) arguments in support of gun control, his team is in a lot of trouble.
I don't reason in binary. Binary thinking is for lower IQ people. So I don't use lightly words like "everybody" "never", "none", "always"... and similar.. to make an argument.And everybody's just going to obey these restrictions?
Or in any other form you can't. You believe something that's wrong.I don't reason in binary.
Telling other people that they're low IQ is really about buttressing your own ego.Binary thinking is for lower IQ people. So I don't use words like "everybody" lightly
With this idiocy the only people that will follow it are the ones that are not the problem.Like ANY law, some will follow it, some won't
So people that follow the law are the ones controlled. The unlicensed Black market gun dealers will find new markets.But most licensed gun sellers will.
No they will produce the same amount. The primary customer for firearms is Nations. If they can make money selling surplus to willing buyers I don't think they care.So factories will produce less.
People were assaulting others with weapons millennia before they were guns so yes there will be.And little by little there won't be more and more assault weapons put out in the streets.
I actually think this will increase manufacture of firearms. Because now that America is weakened because we don't have an entire population that's armed people will be pointing guns at us.Until... what is out there is out there unless they are used in a crime and are confiscated. But not more.
What I said was that the title was sarcastic. And that I wouldn't need to explain that to anybody with an average IQ or higher. They would immediately spot it on their own. Can't speak for anybody under average IQ, though.Let's remember that @Feynman Lives! has protested that the title of his thread is a joke.
But has also claimed it is his ultimate goal.
I don't reason in binary. Binary thinking is for lower IQ people.
Oh? Does this mean that YOU reason in binary?Telling other people that they're low IQ is really about buttressing your own ego.
That's a way of admitting that your full of itWhat I said was that the title was sarcastic.
Insulting others because you got owned is patheticAnd that I wouldn't need to explain that to anybody with an average IQ or higher.
I'm not falling for it. I don't think you have a particularly high IQ so you projecting that on to others because they called out your irrational nonsense is just an attempt to save faceThey would immediately spot it on their own. Can't speak for anybody under average IQ, though.
The attempt to disguise stupidity as a joke is low IQ and embarrassment.The ability to detect sarcasm, jokes (and, for that matter, to know the difference) correlates to IQ.
What would you know about it?Oh? Does this mean that YOU reason in binary?
Ooops!
What I said was that the title was sarcastic. And that I wouldn't need to explain that to anybody with an average IQ or higher. They would immediately spot it on their own. Can't speak for anybody under average IQ, though.
The ability to detect sarcasm, jokes (and, for that matter, to know the difference) correlates to IQ.
Great explain in detail this graduation process and how it’s going to discover criminals.By requiring a graduation process.
.
The only reason for these questions that have an OBVIOUS answer is to waste our time. Not interested. I'll wait for SERIOUS questions, thank you....
So you have to divulge medical information to exercise a rightWhich you are not required to answer unless you want a gun license.
Except you can’t show it will save any lives at all. In fact you can’t show even how it will work.If we have to choose between privacy and saving human life, the life, among people with morals of innocent people wins every time.
So in other words you have no idea if it will work . See you need to KNOW AND Understand THE DETAILS TO know if it’s going to make it harder for people who are irresponsible etc to own a firearm.It won't reduce them. It just won't put more.
I don't care about the details so long as it helps make it harder to purchase a gun for people who don't know the basic safety precautions of owning a gun, or who have some psychological problem that might make them a danger to themselves or others,. The details are irrelevant to ME. They will be very relevant to whoever drafts the final bill. But they can consult professionals in different fields to develop the tests.
First you have to provide the details on how these proposals would be implemented, enforced etc.Ok... fun as this discussion about how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin is.. what I'm looking for is for somebody to take ANY of my proposals and demonstrate why they won't work.
The graduation process includes a mandatory background check. And that might discover criminals, I guess. But that's not the MAIN purpose of the graduation process.Great explain in detail this graduation process and how it’s going to discover criminals.
No. Just to get a gun license...So you have to divulge medical information to exercise a right
It was a tactic I tried when I was about 12 years old if I got caught saying something I shouldn't have I just say I was joking. I worked a couple of times and then people realize that that's a tactic.Except that after saying it was a joke, you also indicated it was your ultimate goal.
I suppose both can be true.
So, what is the MAIN purpose of the graduation process? To make it hard for people to exercise their constitutional rights?The graduation process includes a mandatory background check. And that might discover criminals, I guess. But that's not the MAIN purpose of the graduation process.
You may have heard some something called the United States Constitution. The Second Amendment to that Constitution deals with an issue called the “right to keep and bear arms”. So, yes, it is a civil right.No. Just to get a gun license...
You just buy one on the black market so this is pointless.The graduation process includes a mandatory background check.
No they'll justify on the black market.And that might discover criminals, I guess.
Yes it's to interfere with people's rights and suspend Liberty.But that's not the MAIN purpose of the graduation process.
We already have a license it's called the second amendment. You have to disqualify someone in order to say they can't have a firearmNo. Just to get a gun license...
You are making a big assumption that he is an adult. He definitely “debates” in a juvenile manner and in a position based on emotion rather than facts.It was a tactic I tried when I was about 12 years old if I got caught saying something I shouldn't have I just say I was joking. I worked a couple of times and then people realize that that's a tactic.
He's doing something now presumably in his adulthood that I learned not to do when I was 12.
As much as I hate seeing this phrase I'm going to attribute that to emotional maturity.You are making a big assumption that he is an adult. He definitely “debates” in a juvenile manner and in a position based on emotion rather than facts.
One of the reasons I don't interact with that poster much.
"... definitely “debates” in a juvenile manner."
When you decide to bring facts to the discussion instead of snark, please let us know. Till then…"... definitely “debates” in a juvenile manner."
Same. same comrade.When you decide to bring facts to the discussion instead of snark, please let us know. Till then…
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?