• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How the Bin Laden operation stayed secret

Temporal

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
3,691
Reaction score
2,243
Location
Everywhere and Nowhere
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
I was listening to the Diane Rhem show today and the question came up about how this operation to get Bin Laden stayed secret for months, despite the fact that we seem to be in an age of wikileaks and way-too-fast media. One of her guests had this to say:

I think what this says about leaks is when everyone is agreed on the mission, on the goal, which in this case was to take Bin Laden out of commission then nobody has an incentive to leak. You have incentives to leak when there are disagreements about the policy and about the objectives. Here there were no disagreements.

It was a point that got me thinking. Maybe leaked information is sort of an indication of whether we're doing the right thing. When our flaws are exposed, should we really get mad at or go after people?
 
Back
Top Bottom