• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How many people died from Iranian weapons bought with Obama's pallet of cash?

Grandpappy

America First Populist
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2019
Messages
15,598
Reaction score
7,783
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I'm glad Trump mentioned this in his speech this morning. It's an example of the consequences of electing an incompetent leader.
 
See if anyone can pick out, in the thread title, the words that show how effective Rush Limbaugh and Sean hannity are.
 
I'm glad Trump mentioned this in his speech this morning. It's an example of the consequences of electing an incompetent leader.

Are you under the impression that Iran didn't have any missiles before the Iran nuclear deal and before the US returned Iran's money?
 
Not pallet of cash pallets of cash. Don't try to change history.
 

Our ruling

A Facebook post claimed: "Iran will be shooting at our soldiers with bullets, etc., purchased with the $150 billion Obama gave them." The 2015 Iran nuclear deal involved multiple nations, not just the United States under Obama, and did not involve the United States giving cash to Iran. It’s also debatable whether Iran ultimately got access to $150 billion of what were its own assets — which had been frozen in retaliation for its pursuit of a nuclear weapon — or whether the amount was much less.

What is correct is that largely because of the U.S. involvement, the deal resulted Iran getting access to likely tens of billions of dollars of its own funds, and it’s unclear how they might be spent. For a statement that contains only an element of truth, our ruling is Mostly False.


$150 billion is high-end estimate for Iranian assets gained after nuclear deal | PolitiFact Facebook fact-checks

I'm glad Trump mentioned this in his speech this morning. It's an example of the consequences of electing an incompetent leader.

Why do you lie so much?






Obama didn't give Iran any of our money. Assets that had been frozen were unfrozen as part of the deal that all monitors said was working when the utter scum you worship tore it up, replaced it with nothing. And now he's taken out their leader, they've announced they're going all out to build those nukes that they had stopped trying to build.

If Hannity told you that the sky was red and you were really a gecko hallucinating that it can walk on two feet, you'd be telling us all about your amazing discovery the next day, wouldn't you?
 
Are you under the impression that Iran didn't have any missiles before the Iran nuclear deal and before the US returned Iran's money?

Are you under the impression that the Iranians didn't buy weapons with that money?
 
Wow. Scared to answer or unable?

Well of course they did. My God, I guess that makes me, a dumbass Trump voting redneck, smarter that Obama.
Maybe not smarter, just more common sense. A leader needs common sense.
 

Our ruling

A Facebook post claimed: "Iran will be shooting at our soldiers with bullets, etc., purchased with the $150 billion Obama gave them." The 2015 Iran nuclear deal involved multiple nations, not just the United States under Obama, and did not involve the United States giving cash to Iran. It’s also debatable whether Iran ultimately got access to $150 billion of what were its own assets — which had been frozen in retaliation for its pursuit of a nuclear weapon — or whether the amount was much less.

What is correct is that largely because of the U.S. involvement, the deal resulted Iran getting access to likely tens of billions of dollars of its own funds, and it’s unclear how they might be spent. For a statement that contains only an element of truth, our ruling is Mostly False.


$150 billion is high-end estimate for Iranian assets gained after nuclear deal | PolitiFact Facebook fact-checks



Why do you lie so much?






Obama didn't give Iran any of our money. Assets that had been frozen were unfrozen as part of the deal that all monitors said was working when the utter scum you worship tore it up, replaced it with nothing. And now he's taken out their leader, they've announced they're going all out to build those nukes that they had stopped trying to build.

If Hannity told you that the sky was red and you were really a gecko hallucinating that it can walk on two feet, you'd be telling us all about your amazing discovery the next day, wouldn't you?

The 150 billion is a gross overestimate as well.

It was estimated that 150 billion frozen assets, that about 50 billion was in usable liquid assets. Still a lot of money, but it's not the 150 people try to throw around.
 
Trump looked like he had been tranquilized........
 
So if they had those weapons before the nuclear deal, then there's no reason to assume that they bought them with that money, correct?

They bought more and better, yes. You know, bigger boom, that sort of thing?
 
The 150 billion is a gross overestimate as well.

It was estimated that 150 billion frozen assets, that about 50 billion was in usable liquid assets. Still a lot of money, but it's not the 150 people try to throw around.


Right right. It mentions that 150 is the highest estimate and has the least evidence for it, etc. But whatever it is, it isn't what Hannity told Grandpappy to say.
 
I'm glad Trump mentioned this in his speech this morning. It's an example of the consequences of electing an incompetent leader.

None, given that it wasn't Obama's pallet of cash. It wasn't even his money.
 
They bought more and better, yes. You know, bigger boom, that sort of thing?

And what info do you have that shows these weren't missiles that they have had for a long time?
 
Trump looked like he had been tranquilized........

I know. He was slurring his speech as though his tongue fell asleep. And his face was more orange than normal. He is not well.
 
Are you under the impression that the Iranians didn't buy weapons with that money?

Lefties think they bought rainbows and skittles with that untraceable cash. Makes you wonder why Obama paid them in cash eh?
 
Right right. It mentions that 150 is the highest estimate and has the least evidence for it, etc. But whatever it is, it isn't what Hannity told Grandpappy to say.

I got a big kick, not over what Hannity said, but how their hate obsession with Trump caused many in the MSM to say really stupid things...;)
It looks like they actually believe their own BS narrative..
Poor, dumb bastards.
 
I know. He was slurring his speech as though his tongue fell asleep. And his face was more orange than normal. He is not well.
Yeah unlike Obama Trump was up all night not sleeping while our embassy was attacked.
 
Well of course they did. My God, I guess that makes me, a dumbass Trump voting redneck, smarter that Obama.
Maybe not smarter, just more common sense. A leader needs common sense.

They had plenty of money and they make their own missiles anyway. Trump's buddy Putin does sell weapons to Iran though. Maybe you should blame him too.If Putin is such a good guy why does he sell weapons to our enemies?
 
thread title: How many people died from Iranian weapons bought with Obama's pallet of cash?

None...it was Irans cash.
 
Right right. It mentions that 150 is the highest estimate and has the least evidence for it, etc. But whatever it is, it isn't what Hannity told Grandpappy to say.

Well it's mostly just Fake News propaganda.
 
See if anyone can pick out, in the thread title, the words that show how effective Rush Limbaugh and Sean hannity are.

See if anyone can pick out the idiocy in the quote above.
 
Back
Top Bottom