• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Many Attacks Will It Take Until the White-Supremacist Threat Is Taken Seriously?

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,828
Reaction score
83,376
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
How Many Attacks Will It Take Until the White-Supremacist Threat Is Taken Seriously?

FBI Director Christopher Wray said recently that the bureau doesn’t “investigate the ideology, no matter how repugnant. We investigate violence.”




Serious new law enforcement tools to combat domestic white supremacy/nationalism probably won't occur until the current Trump administration is removed en-mass.

Another of the many excellent and increasingly crucial reasons to vote him out of office come November 3, 2020.
 
It was just one guy who shoot up that Walmart.

It's not like there's a organization with 10,000 members that we can infiltrate or sue.

The Ku Klux Klan was a big organization back in the 1860's - 1945. They've been pretty much destroyed. I don't really see a new organization taking their place.
 

One must be cautious when giving the government more power to surveil, monitor, invade privacy, etc., that in fear you give up your own privacy rights.

What can be used against extremists can also be used against the common citizen, and you wouldn't know it until too late. Anyone remember Eric Snowden and the NSA?

IMO, people should be encouraged to report concerns but not simply "suspicions." There must be a good faith belief supported by a preponderance of the evidence standard in order to start an investigation. Otherwise you'd have every gossip and busybody having anyone they disliked being checked out resulting in unnecessary harassment and wasting police time.

I don't care who allegedly raised this homily, IMO it remains true nonetheless. To paraphrase it in my own words; those who give up essential liberties to purchase temporary security, end up with neither liberty nor security.
 
Last edited:
One must be cautious when giving the government more power to surveil, monitor, invade privacy, etc., that in fear you give up your own privacy rights.

Yup, that surveillance, monitoring, and invasion of privacy should be reserved for minorities and illegals.
 

How do you know which white supremacists are a threat? One out of many white supremacists mowed down people with his car.
 

You've just got to pretend HARDER. Maybe someone will eventually believe your protestations. :lamo
 
How do you know which white supremacists are a threat? One out of many white supremacists mowed down people with his car.

White supremacy itself is a threat.
If you're aligned with and enamored of white supremacy, you're a threat.
Your beliefs are inextricably tied to a history of genocide.
There is no such thing as "peaceful" ethnic cleansing, and white supremacy is tied to ethnic cleansing.

One cannot pretend to believe in a passive, non-violent or otherwise "benevolent" form of white supremacism because no such thing exists.
 

And then there was the one leftist guy in Daytona, which seems to have slipped from prominence in the media.
 

What was your suggestion when the threat was radical Islam?
 

Then you would have to extend that to Fartkhan.
 
And then there was the one leftist guy in Daytona, which seems to have slipped from prominence in the media.

Right. Clearly Bernie and Warren are speaking in dog whistles to get their supporters to slaughter people. Hopefully the FBI will look into them and end this scourge of left wing mass murders.
 
Right. Clearly Bernie and Warren are speaking in dog whistles to get their supporters to slaughter people. Hopefully the FBI will look into them and end this scourge of left wing mass murders.

Sarcasm? You are a perfect example of Poe's law.
 
You sure love your whataboutism.

Its called pointing out liberal hypocrisy. Anyone calling for steps today that they opposed when the threat was of a different origin are hypocrites. Sorry if that offends you.
 
Its called pointing out liberal hypocrisy. Anyone calling for steps today that they opposed when the threat was of a different origin are hypocrites. Sorry if that offends you.

What hypocrisy. Islamic terrorists are being monitored anyway.
 
Then you would have to extend that to Fartkhan.

Louis Farrakhan? The guy who "Mansoned" the death of Malcolm X?
Without a doubt.
How he escaped charges for his death will always be a mystery.
 
Naw, you choose to ignore the hypocrisy. I suppose it would have to take a Black Panther Patrol to get the GOP to do anything.

Armed black militants exercising their 2A rights is what spurred California's extreme conceal and open carry gun laws, thanks to a Republican governor named Ronald Reagan, who "of course didn't sign The Mulford Act out of any racial fear, prejudice or animus...oh noooooo."
:lamo

By the way, the killings continue in the State of California despite the strict gun laws, because of course murderers and other criminals don't pay any attention to CC and open carry gun laws.

Personally I do not have an issue with restricting open carry in highly populated centers but everything else is open to ridicule. Law abiding citizens deserve to be able to concealed carry.
 
Last edited:
Right. Clearly Bernie and Warren are speaking in dog whistles to get their supporters to slaughter people. Hopefully the FBI will look into them and end this scourge of left wing mass murders.

Political rhetoric short of actual incitement to violence, and meeting that legal incitement to violence standard, is most certainly NOT the cause of some unstable person going off and doing something rash. That's completely on the actor.

Where our friends from the left get confused, it would appear, is only wanting to apply that standard to the politicians from their side.
All other politicians, those not of their side, this standard be damned. If it weren't for double standards, the left would have no standards at all.
 
How many people are in these groups? 1,000? 10,000? Millions?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…