• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long did it take you to develop your current stance on abortion? Give us your reasons


You see the problem is that all pregnancy causes risk to the mother.

Really good access to medical care ( an experienced doctor that knows you and is accessible), strong social support, and having a secure living environment helps mitigate some of the potential harm. But you have to ask what do the women who chose abortion usually lack? Those very things.

I went ahead with my pregnancy knowing that I had a good income, strong social resoources, a job that probably would keep my position open for me if I was out >12 weeks. I had a 3 month financial cush in case of emergency. How many women who chose abortion have that?

As it was, that financial cush for three months evaporated in less that three months. I was out for nearly 6 months and was not prepared for the COBRA payments that were $800-1000 a month(24 years ago). I went deeply in debt before the baby arrived. But I knew I had to keep my private health care!!!!
 
Acadia said:
Just wondering if this applies to murder?
Click to expand...

Well, I oppose murder but not for religious reasons. To me what makes a person a person and what makes me value them as an existing entity is the presence of a mind. Murder is the extinguishing of a mind. But until a brain has developed enough for a mind to emerge there is no person as far as I am concerned. I couldn’t care less about DNA or heart beats or what organs something has. But something that has a mind has a right to exist as far as I am concerned.
 

Thanks for your thoughtful answer.
 
MrWonka said:
1/3rd of all pregnancies in the United States end in Miscarriage. Often times before the women even realizes she's pregnant.

Equating Abortion to Murder is like saying that eating walnuts equates to deforestation.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that miscarriages aren't on purpose. Therefore not murder. But 1/3 of all pregnancies? That's a huge number of women. I'll bet many of them would love to adopt those babies headed for abortion.
 

Me, too. I also think there are benefits from abortion; lower crime rates, less costs for welfare, less prison crowding, etc. On all of these issues Margaret Sanger was correct. But just cause there are some benefits don't mean it ain't murder.
 
Waddy said:
Me, too. I also think there are benefits from abortion; lower crime rates, less costs for welfare, less prison crowding, etc. On all of these issues Margaret Sanger was correct. But just cause there are some benefits don't mean it ain't murder.
Click to expand...

We’d all love to see the laws that make abortion murder. What are the State conviction rates for women who have had an abortion in the last 200 years?

Margaret Sanger is dead. 2/3rds of the people don’t know who their town mayors are. How is Sanger’s existence relevant to abortion today?
 

The law used to consider it murder, but not since Roe. I am entitled to call it anything I want. I consider it murder. However, I support a woman's right to murder the child she's carrying. You are entitled to disagree. Considering Margaret Sanger's ideas are the foundation of the modern pro-abortion movement, I'd say she's still very relevant.
 

Yes, you have the right to be among a minority who also believe that abortion is murder. Your opinion is noted, but for the record, it’s not congruent with the laws of the land.

I think that you have a very skewed perception of what Sanger believed and didn’t believe. And of course you have that right as well.
 

Historically it was never considered murder. That's incorrect.

And since there are many good reasons to support abortion and no negative effects on society, it's easy to forget about her. Do we completely dismiss the Constitution because some of the FF's kept slaves, slept with (raped) slaves?
 

I've been pro-choice since high school. That is one of the few issues I have not flipped on in the nearly 40 years since. The other is my hatred for Russia--although I had a glimmer of hope for them in the early 90's. But, something went very wrong.

Abortion is actually the best option for some. And, they should have that choice.
 
When I first learned about abortion I thought it was murder, and that was that.

During the War in Vietnam support for abortion sort of went along with opposition to the War in Vietnam, so I went along, but not enthusiastically. For me the issue was controlling the growth in the world's population. I never really cared about "a woman's right to choose." Nor did I care about "the right to life," because I was and I am an enthusiast for capital punishment.

I opposed Roe vs Wade, on principle, because I thought it was a flimsy piece of legal reasoning. Then I read Freakonomics. That book attributes the decline in the rate of violent crime after 1992 to the Roe decision. It argued that the same kind of females most likely to have abortions are most likely to give birth to boy babies that grow up to become violent criminals. That convinced me that the Roe decision was a good decision from a eugenic standpoint.

Most Americans do not want Roe to be overturned. If it is, that will probably hurt the Republicans. For that reason I sort of want it to be overturned. If Roe is overturned, that will shake things up quite a bit. That will be fun to watch.

I have always been ambivalent about abortion. It is a gruesome operation, but it reduces the birth rate of the biologically inferior.
 
SmartCat said:
I have always been ambivalent about abortion. It is a gruesome operation, but it reduces the birth rate of the biologically inferior.
Click to expand...

Nobody (except maybe one poster here) is enthusiastic about abortion. No one "likes" abortion. It's recognized as a necessity for some women, based on their own lives.

As for it being a gruesome operation, in 97.5% of all abortions it consists of painlessly flushing a pea-sized unborn from the womb. The rare later ones are of medical necessity and are also painless....anesthetic injection is used.

I think your reply was very thoughtful. And there are loads of studies that show that kids born into socio-economically challenging circumstances are at higher risk of not finishing school, getting higher educations, and becoming involved in criminal activity.
 
MrWonka said:
You should maybe learn what the word inconvenience means before you use it. Describing a pregnancy as inconvenient means you either don't know what the word means or don't understand pregnancy.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should learn to comprehend what you read. I stated that I beleive there are too many abortions because some feel having a child would inconvenient the mother for various reasons. Doesn't matter if I think it is right or wrong...abortions do happen for those reasons.

in·con·ven·ient
/ˌinkənˈvēnyənt/
adjective

1.
causing trouble, difficulties, or discomfort:
 

An inconvenience is having to sit in the middle seat on a cross-country flight for a few hours. A pregnancy is a major ****ing ordeal that lasts almost an entire year, it causes daily sickness, permanently deforms your body, and can even kill you. It is a radical and life-changing experience for any woman that goes through it. For a child, you actually want it can bring you great joy, but for a child, you didn't want it's is incredibly traumatic.

Calling pregnancy an inconvenience is like calling a 20 car pile up a fender bender. That's like calling D-Day a light tussle.
 

Yeah, so do you/would you teach your kids that finishing high school is a "convenience?" Going to college or trade school is a "convenience?" Showing up at your job everyday, and not puking, is a "convenience?" Not losing your job because you are too sick to go in is a "convenience?" Being well enough and focused enough to develop a job into a real career is a "convenience?" Paying all your bills and not taking public assistance to support a child is a "convenience?" Being able to support the family you have and live in a safe, secure neighborhood is a "convenience?"

Well, maybe you consider your own life a string of "conveniences" but I value mine more and I believe most other people do too.

Can you find, in any of those lists that show why women have abortions, "convenience" listed? I dont think so. For you to sum up a woman's life as just a bunch of conveniences is insulting.
 

You're right, there is no perfectly fair solution. I just don't think that killing some for the good of others is ever an ok solution.


Lursa said:
Most pro-life supporters want to claim they value the born and unborn equally, when that is not possible legally. It cant be done. And IMO, it cant be done ethically either.
Click to expand...

Why do you feel that it is not possible to value born and unborn equally?
 

In the vast majority of pregnancies a woman does not have a 100% chance of dying. If in her case she does have a 100% chance of dying then I think she should be able to get an abortion.
 

Yet, I have seen numerous kids born into horrific poverty that somehow their parents figure out how to raise them and they turn out OK. Where there's a will there's a way.
 

Why you trying to school me? I did not say "I" believe it to be an inconvenience.....you seem to be hung up on 1 word instead of my whole comment. Bottom line is there ARE women who get abortions because it is more convenient than the alternative.
 

Yes I value mine and I also value the right to choose. That doesn't mean I am going to pretend that abortions of convenience do not happen.
 
nthasama said:
You're right, there is no perfectly fair solution. I just don't think that killing some for the good of others is ever an ok solution.
Click to expand...
For me a life is much more than breathing.

I believe in quality of life over quantity. The woman is here, contributing to society, may have dependents and obligations that are her responsibility. OTOH, the unborn may not even survive to be born or may be born with mental/physical defects.

Why do you feel that it is not possible to value born and unborn equally?
Click to expand...

It can be at an individual personal level but not in any practical way. Not legally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…