• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How likely is it that people in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action because they wanted war

Did ppl in fed gov assist or take no action in 9/11/01?

  • Total voters
    23
MrNiceGuy

MrNiceGuy

Symbiotic Pnemonic
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Messages
17,427
Reaction score
7,500
Location
The Twilight Zone
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
"How likely is it that people in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East?" the poll asked.

A full 22.6% of Democrats said it was "very likely." Another 28.2% called it "somewhat likely."

That is: More than half of Democrats, according to a neutral survey, said they believed Bush was complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks. https://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-...n-half-of-democrats-believed-bush-knew-035224
Click to expand...
What do y'all think today?
 
One of the least unlikely conspiracy theories of all time.

Just the sheer number of people who'd have had to be involved is insane.

And we also know they could just...lie? They could just claim WMD's and carry on.

Furthermore, why did they just blindly want war? To what end?
 
Quag said:
No choice of Bat S**t insane BS Ct so I couldnt vote
Click to expand...
That would be "other"

more than 50% of Democrats used to think it was somewhat likely or very likely. LOL.
 
tshade said:
Bush was warned and his response was "Ok, You Covered Your ass"............................enough said.

The crazy part is that Bush was considered the worst president in our lifetimes, until Trump..........
Click to expand...
Now Democrats think that he's an honorable guy with just a bit of a difference of opinion and they think it's a good sign that this person endorses their candidate. LOL
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Wow! The debate went that bad, eh? Let's talk about 9/11 conspiracies instead, ok?
Click to expand...
It's 9/11 today. I'm old enough to still feel that day to my bones. To me, it was yesterday.

I've addressed the debate in at least 2 other threads, so do try again.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
It's 9/11 today. I'm old enough to still feel that day to my bones. To me, it was yesterday.

I've addressed the debate in at least 2 other threads, so do try again.
Click to expand...
Fine. You want to talk about 9/11 conspiracies? Post it in the CT forum, where it belongs.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
What do y'all think today?
Click to expand...
I wonder what the Republican number to that question would be today. It would probably equal the Democratic number in 2011.
 
tshade said:
Bush was warned and his response was "Ok, You Covered Your ass"............................enough said.

The crazy part is that Bush was considered the worst president in our lifetimes, until Trump..........
Click to expand...
The warning was that AQ wanted to strike the U.S.

It was not that hijackers would turn passenger airliners into guided missiles.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
That would be "other"

more than 50% of Democrats used to think it was somewhat likely or very likely. LOL.
Click to expand...
Is that the point of this silly thread to claim Dems are nuts?
 
Cardinal said:
I wonder what the Republican number to that question would be today. It would probably equal the Democratic number in 2011.
Click to expand...
I doubt it but the Truimplican numbers would be way higher
 
Quag said:
Is that the point of this silly thread to claim Dems are nuts?
Click to expand...
The point is to see who believes that stuff now. The fact is that over 50% of democrats believed it in 2011, 10 years after the event.

Does that make you uncomfortable?
 
MrNiceGuy said:
Now Democrats think that he's an honorable guy with just a bit of a difference of opinion and they think it's a good sign that this person endorses their candidate. LOL
Click to expand...
The republicans now are endorsing an actual felon for president, so LOL indeed!
 
MrNiceGuy said:
The point is to see who believes that stuff now. The fact is that over 50% of democrats believed it in 2011, 10 years after the event.

Does that make you uncomfortable?
Click to expand...
Why would that make me uncomfortable?
 
MrNiceGuy said:
Now Democrats think that he's an honorable guy with just a bit of a difference of opinion and they think it's a good sign that this person endorses their candidate. LOL
Click to expand...
Shows how bat shit the Republicans have gone since then. The goddamn neocons are the reasonable ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom