- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Bizarre...you ask people to make a case for how one thing is not another?! Why are you soliciting arguments? That is not how this works. You need to make a stronger case that one thing is another. "as far as I can see, because I obviously don't know what the hell socialism is" ... or... "because Beck says so in this here video" is not good enough.
so when I ask you to explain how, I'm derailing the thread. O-kay.The point is that Obama and this ****bird are on the same page.
How is this guy different from Obama's inner circle?
so when I ask you to explain how, I'm derailing the thread. O-kay.
Ok, you're right, maybe yours and Mach's postings are similar in the way they are laid out, obviously from different sides of the spectrum though. so tell us what do you see as the flaw in comparing this Socialist/Marxist in NYC to that of the people that Obama seems to surround himself with on policy making?
j-mac
Easy, the flaw in comparing Brandt with the Obama team is that there is no compelling evidence that they are the same. Obama and Co are not communists.
Alarmist wingnut hyperbole got used on the last administration.
The Bush team were called "Fascists." They weren't.
Keith Olberman said:February 14, 2008 (Special Comment)
"If you believe in the seamless mutuality of government and big business, come out and say it! There is a dictionary definition, one word that describes that toxic blend. You're a fascist! Get them to print you a T-shirt with fascist on it! What else is this but fascism?"
Olbermann Hides His ?Bush is Fascist? Past As Dean Decries Calling Any President ?Fascist? | NewsBusters.org
Rarely is there as transparent an example of liberal media bias as the tantrum thrown by CNN's Susan Roesgen yesterday while "reporting" on a tea party, but the full extent of her bias only comes into light when you look back at her attitude toward anti-Bush protesters.
In video posted by Paul Chesser from yesterday's CNN broadcast, Roesgen harassed a man who had a sign in which Obama was portrayed as a fascist with a Hitler mustache. "Why be so hard on the President of the United States though with such an offensive message?" an indignant Roesgen hollered.
Yet back in 2006, when she was covering protests against the Bush administration's response to Katrina, she jokingly referred to this photo of a man wearing a mask with devil horns and a Hitler mustache as a Bush "look-alike." (Video available at NewsBusters).
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Flashback: In 2006, CNN's Roesgen Joked About Bush/Hitler Mask
The same thing is happening here.
Prove they are "progressives" and then explain to us what you think "progressivism" entails. Thanks in advance.I disagree. Many of Obama's inner circle are "Progressives" What are they "Progressing" to?
You misunderstand. He said Bush was called a "Fascist" and was not one, just like Obama is being called a "Communist" and "Socialist" but is not one.Really? Liberals never called Bush a Fascist?
Prove they are "progressives" and then explain to us what you think "progressivism" entails. Thanks in advance.
You misunderstand. He said Bush was called a "Fascist" and was not one, just like Obama is being called a "Communist" and "Socialist" but is not one.
So you cannot tell us what a "Progressive" is? Okay, that's telling.Nice try, you think that by loading me down in some definitive way so that you can pick my definitions apart line by line is going to work? Let's just say that the man in the op video, and many in the Obama administration, other than hair cut, are cut from the same cloth.
Much like hyperpartisan Conservatives love to do the same exact thing with different words. :dohOk, I went back and looked at it again, and you could be right. Not withstanding though, the fact is that liberals just love to assign labels to conservatives such as "racist, homophobe, fascist, and etc...."
What do you mean by "you all"?Now when it starts being questioned that Obama, and team may actually have an agenda of the destruction of capitalism, in favor of a more Euro Socialist setting, you all freak out.....
So you cannot tell us what a "Progressive" is? Okay, that's telling.
Much like hyperpartisan Conservatives love to do the same exact thing with different words.
What do you mean by "you all"?
Talk is cheap. :shrug:Oh I could, I just don't feel like maxing out the character limitations from screen to screen making your arse look foolish, all to have you just come back after my hard work, and say something seemingly intelligent like "Nuh uh!"
I think you guys are both idiots when it comes to defaming each other. The point is that both sides do it. If you fail to recognize this, nothing I can do will change your mind.Doubtful that you could show anything even close to the same sort of rhetoric that liberals thrust toward defaming conservatives.
I've never met a Liberal in Libertarian clothing. Just because I call you out because you can't define the term "progressive" doesn't mean I side with Democrats.Oh I don't know....Libertarians that are actually liberals hiding from their true nature and label in here....I am not saying you are one of course, but I have to wonder with todays contributions.....:mrgreen:
Talk is cheap. :shrug:
I think you guys are both idiots when it comes to defaming each other. The point is that both sides do it. If you fail to recognize this, nothing I can do will change your mind.
I've never met a Liberal in Libertarian clothing. Just because I call you out because you can't define the term "progressive" doesn't mean I side with Democrats.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?