- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
- Messages
- 27,599
- Reaction score
- 42,934
- Location
- Hiding from ICE
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Roe vs Wade?The legal battle over Louisiana law requiring schools to display Ten Commandments
It's pretty specific. It says the Ten Commandments need to be displayed in large, easily readable font. The law also says posters displaying the commandments have to include a context statement, the exact wording of which was included in the law passed by Louisiana's Republican-controlled legislature. It's several paragraphs but, in short, says the Ten Commandments, quote, "were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries," though I should say some historians argue that isn't true.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a similar law to Louisiana's in 1980. In that ruling, the court said requiring schools in Kentucky to post the Ten Commandments, quote, "had no secular legislative purpose," was plainly religious and therefore unconstitutional. Now, Louisiana's attorney general argues the state's law is different and constitutional. She says it passes a history and tradition test and that it's about teaching morals. Opponents aren't buying that, though. They say this case is about getting something that's already been decided back to the Supreme Court, which now has a conservative supermajority.
Let's explain the 7th Commandment to 3rd Graders.
You think it wouldn't bother me if the government ordered Islamic, or Hindu, or Buddhist texts on the wall? Of course it would.The way to test whether this would bother you or not. Is put another faiths,other than christianity,in the classrooms on the wall. Would this bother you?
Wait until the Satanists insist on putting their literature on the walls because the government can't discriminate. Then you can imagine the horror.Imagine the horror of it all!!!
Funny stuffWait until the Satanists insist on putting their literature on the walls because the government can't discriminate. Then you can imagine the horror.
That Is What bothers the families involved in the law suit rev. Roake versus brumley. This comment I made was not specifically toward anyone. It was a yard stick example,of why it bothered the families and group involved. That is how they see it. Separation of state and religion.You think it wouldn't bother me if the government ordered Islamic, or Hindu, or Buddhist texts on the wall? Of course it would.
The legal battle over Louisiana law requiring schools to display Ten Commandments
It's pretty specific. It says the Ten Commandments need to be displayed in large, easily readable font. The law also says posters displaying the commandments have to include a context statement, the exact wording of which was included in the law passed by Louisiana's Republican-controlled legislature. It's several paragraphs but, in short, says the Ten Commandments, quote, "were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries," though I should say some historians argue that isn't true.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a similar law to Louisiana's in 1980. In that ruling, the court said requiring schools in Kentucky to post the Ten Commandments, quote, "had no secular legislative purpose," was plainly religious and therefore unconstitutional. Now, Louisiana's attorney general argues the state's law is different and constitutional. She says it passes a history and tradition test and that it's about teaching morals. Opponents aren't buying that, though. They say this case is about getting something that's already been decided back to the Supreme Court, which now has a conservative supermajority.
Let's explain the 7th Commandment to 3rd Graders.
It is quite horrible. The path to theocracy is a slippery slope, and never ends well.Imagine the horror of it all!!!
Extremist justices mean extreme precedents. More chaos to come.New justices means new precedents.
Imagine the horror of it all!!!
Funny stuff
Funny? How so?Funny stuff
The Constitution says two things about religion. 1. The government will not form a national church. 2. The government will not interfere in anyone's ability to worship as they choose.The legal battle over Louisiana law requiring schools to display Ten Commandments
It's pretty specific. It says the Ten Commandments need to be displayed in large, easily readable font. The law also says posters displaying the commandments have to include a context statement, the exact wording of which was included in the law passed by Louisiana's Republican-controlled legislature. It's several paragraphs but, in short, says the Ten Commandments, quote, "were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries," though I should say some historians argue that isn't true.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a similar law to Louisiana's in 1980. In that ruling, the court said requiring schools in Kentucky to post the Ten Commandments, quote, "had no secular legislative purpose," was plainly religious and therefore unconstitutional. Now, Louisiana's attorney general argues the state's law is different and constitutional. She says it passes a history and tradition test and that it's about teaching morals. Opponents aren't buying that, though. They say this case is about getting something that's already been decided back to the Supreme Court, which now has a conservative supermajority.
Let's explain the 7th Commandment to 3rd Graders.
You are missing something significant.The Constitution says two things about religion. 1. The government will not form a national church. 2. The government will not interfere in anyone's ability to worship as they choose.
Does a law putting the 10 commandments on the wall constitute the government forming a national church? NO Does it constitute the government keeping anyone from worshipping as they choose? NO
The ten commandments are on the supreme court building. America was founded on Christian principles.
The Constitution says two things about religion. 1. The government will not form a national church. 2. The government will not interfere in anyone's ability to worship as they choose.
Does a law putting the 10 commandments on the wall constitute the government forming a national church? NO Does it constitute the government keeping anyone from worshipping as they choose? NO
The ten commandments are on the supreme court building. America was founded on Christian principles.
1. America WAS founded on christian principles. That is an historic fact, not an opinion or legislative issue.The 10 C should not be displayed on the wall of the SC or any government building.
Public money should not be used to support any religion.
The “America was founded on Christian principles” has been argued to death. It will one day likely be decided by the Supreme Court.
You clearly support replacing our democracy with a Christocracy. That could happen under Trump. Until then don’t get your panties in a twist.
The Supreme Court also called abortion legal. What you cited can change.You are missing something significant.
The Supreme Court has established a three-part test to determine if something constitutes an "establishment of religion":
Putting up any particular religious object clearly promotes that religion.
- The primary purpose of the assistance must be secular
- The assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion
- There is no excessive entanglement between church and state
America was founded on principles that are largely SHARED by Christianity, along with most other religions.
1. America WAS founded on christian principles. That is an historic fact, not an opinion or legislative issue.
2. Your statement about a "Christocracy" is your fabrication. Nothing and nobody has ever said anything like that. You made that up.
3. Why shouldn't the 10 C be displayed on the wall of the SC or any government building? What is your Constitutional reference to support that?
4. "Public money should not be used to support any religion". Why not? It doesn't violate the Constitution. And where are you on public money supporting abortion and sex changes?
I think you are driven by your biases, not principle, evidence, etc. If I'm wrong about this, give me some principles, evidence, etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?