• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Intelligence Committee in possession of video, audio recordings from Giuliani associate Lev Pa

Do they have a pee-pee tape?
 
digitusmedius said:
House Intelligence Committee in possession of video, audio recordings from Giuliani associate Lev Parnas - ABC News

Ruh-roh
Click to expand...

Word I'm getting from highly placed, highly credible and impeccably qualified, albeit anonymous, sources is that the videos will show Parnas, Giuliani and Fruman peeing on a hotel bed in Moscow which Barack Obama once slept in. In the corresponding audio transcripts they discuss how they will blame the pee on Russian hookers and then leaking the information to certain UK investigators. While there is no direct ti to Trump in any of this the careful listener will hear references to "The Don" and "The Orange Comet" which might, perhaps, be references to Trump. The evidence in these tapes, according to sources, is sufficient to warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor and could be thoroughly only if Trump's tax returns are released to the public.
 
Did Schifferbrain's "kompromat" come through?
 
Acadia said:
Did Schifferbrain's "kompromat" come through?
Click to expand...

I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.
 
Lutherf said:
Word I'm getting from highly placed, highly credible and impeccably qualified, albeit anonymous, sources is that the videos will show Parnas, Giuliani and Fruman peeing on a hotel bed in Moscow which Barack Obama once slept in. In the corresponding audio transcripts they discuss how they will blame the pee on Russian hookers and then leaking the information to certain UK investigators. While there is no direct ti to Trump in any of this the careful listener will hear references to "The Don" and "The Orange Comet" which might, perhaps, be references to Trump. The evidence in these tapes, according to sources, is sufficient to warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor and could be thoroughly only if Trump's tax returns are released to the public.
Click to expand...


According to the bloody article:

The House Intelligence Committee is in possession of audio and video recordings and photographs provided to the committee by Lev Parnas, an associate of President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who reportedly played a key role in assisting him in his efforts to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and Ukraine, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

The material submitted to the committee includes audio, video and photos that include Giuliani and Trump. It was unclear what the content depicts and the committees only began accessing the material last week
Click to expand...

So the exact nature of the content is still unknown and is being reviewed by the intelligence committee.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
According to the bloody article:



So the exact nature of the content is still unknown and is being reviewed by the intelligence committee.
Click to expand...

Hey! Just because your sources aren't sure what's in there doesn't mean that my sources are wrong!
 
Lutherf said:
I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.
Click to expand...

Me too. The best part is when their TDS media sources let them down again.
 
Lutherf said:
I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.
Click to expand...

I just read the article and didn't see lots of speculation.
Irony yes...Lutherf speculating rather than reading, as he cries about speculation.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
You didn’t cite your sources.... at all.
Click to expand...

They're anonymous and, for the sake of their personal safety, have asked that I not reveal their positions...or even that they have positions. As you know, if their identity was discovered it would be a matter of seconds before Trump and his supporters ruined their lives.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
According to the bloody article:



So the exact nature of the content is still unknown and is being reviewed by the intelligence committee.
Click to expand...

But it would hardly be of any benefit to Parnas's hope of getting a deal from the SDNY (which must be part of his motivation for giving these things up as well as the fact that ****bag betrayed him by claiming he didn't know who he was) if he gave the committee garbage.
 
Lutherf said:
They're anonymous and, for the sake of their personal safety, have asked that I not reveal their positions...or even that they have positions. As you know, if their identity was discovered it would be a matter of seconds before Trump and his supporters ruined their lives.
Click to expand...

You don’t consider anything that the Democrats Do to be legitimate.

I cited the article. You cited nothing
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
You don’t consider anything that the Democrats Do to be legitimate.

I cited the article. You cited nothing
Click to expand...

He cited his sources who have seen the tapes. Plus I have two sources (who wish to remain anonymous) who can back up every word of Lutherf's post.
 
If the tapes show Trump raping and murdering school children, his approval will drop down to 41%. Two weeks later, it will return to 43%.
 
Cardinal said:
If the tapes show Trump raping and murdering school children, his approval will drop down to 41%. Two weeks later, it will return to 43%.
Click to expand...


How ****ed up is that?
 
Cardinal said:
If the tapes show Trump raping and murdering school children, his approval will drop down to 41%. Two weeks later, it will return to 43%.
Click to expand...

If the tapes show you making a coherent argument, no one will believe that either.
 
Lutherf said:
I love these stories. They're always a big headline followed by lots of speculation and very little substance.
Click to expand...

You have to learn patience. It was a long time between when the republicans planned the break in at the Watergate building and when they're was finally proof of the things that Nixon did.

Of course we're living in the instant gratification era so everybody wants everything wrapped up in 30 minutes.
 
The problem for democrats has always been that Trump could be caught on video and wouldn't lose votes.

Just like Access Hollywood.
 
CaughtInThe said:
You have to learn patience. It was a long time between when the republicans planned the break in at the Watergate building and when they're was finally proof of the things that Nixon did.

Of course we're living in the instant gratification era so everybody wants everything wrapped up in 30 minutes.
Click to expand...

Well, with Watergate you at least had a break in. At this point all Schiff has is a bunch of bureaucrats who got their noses out of joint and his own theory about Trump's intent. He has presented NOTHING that ties the Biden investigation to the 2020 campaign and, in fact, he asked Zelensky to coordinate with Barr's investigation into 2016.

Look, it's pretty much a given that Schiff is going to put articles of impeachment on Nadler's desk. What happens from there is anybody's guess but it will be something to see if the House votes to impeach with no Republican support whatsoever. That will DEFINITELY be entertaining.
 
Lutherf said:
Well, with Watergate you at least had a break in. At this point all Schiff has is a bunch of bureaucrats who got their noses out of joint and his own theory about Trump's intent. He has presented NOTHING that ties the Biden investigation to the 2020 campaign and, in fact, he asked Zelensky to coordinate with Barr's investigation into 2016.

Look, it's pretty much a given that Schiff is going to put articles of impeachment on Nadler's desk. What happens from there is anybody's guess but it will be something to see if the House votes to impeach with no Republican support whatsoever. That will DEFINITELY be entertaining.
Click to expand...

Trump's memo of the call (not a transcript) mentions the Bidens. There was no "investigation" into the Bidens. You have Trump's personal attorney getting dirt on them to help Trump when and if he is opposed by Biden.

Hunter Biden has nothing to do with the 2016 election.

And we know what will happen. The Republican Senate will ignore the crystal clear quid pro quo and not vote to remove Trump. And when a Democrat even thinks about pulling a stunt like this, you and the other citizens of Trump Fan Nation will howl like scorched cats, and the smart people will remind you of this.
 
tres borrachos said:
Trump's memo of the call (not a transcript) mentions the Bidens. There was no "investigation" into the Bidens. You have Trump's personal attorney getting dirt on them to help Trump when and if he is opposed by Biden.

Hunter Biden has nothing to do with the 2016 election.

And we know what will happen. The Republican Senate will ignore the crystal clear quid pro quo and not vote to remove Trump. And when a Democrat even thinks about pulling a stunt like this, you and the other citizens of Trump Fan Nation will howl like scorched cats, and the smart people will remind you of this.
Click to expand...

Let me ask you a question. What did Manafort's tax issues have to do with Russian collusion in the 2016 election? Was that a legitimate place for Mueller to go in his investigation? If it was then why wouldn't an investigation into possibly illegal lobbying influence stemming from an investigation into Ukranian actions related to the 2016 election also be a legitimate place for Barr to go in his investigation?

Here's another question, in all of the testimony from Schiff's investigation that's been released to the public so far is there ANY link to the Trump reelection campaign? At this point the ONLY thing that is tying the Trump/Zelensky phone call to 2020 is Schiff's interpretation of what was said.

As far as the transcript of the phone call goes, every single person that was on that call has testified that the transcript is accurate. Calling it a "memo" because you want something to be there that isn't there does not make not less than a transcript.
 
Lutherf said:
Let me ask you a question. What did Manafort's tax issues have to do with Russian collusion in the 2016 election? Was that a legitimate place for Mueller to go in his investigation? If it was then why wouldn't an investigation into possibly illegal lobbying influence stemming from an investigation into Ukranian actions related to the 2016 election also be a legitimate place for Barr to go in his investigation?

Here's another question, in all of the testimony from Schiff's investigation that's been released to the public so far is there ANY link to the Trump reelection campaign? At this point the ONLY thing that is tying the Trump/Zelensky phone call to 2020 is Schiff's interpretation of what was said.

As far as the transcript of the phone call goes, every single person that was on that call has testified that the transcript is accurate. Calling it a "memo" because you want something to be there that isn't there does not make not less than a transcript.
Click to expand...

Why are you asking me about Manafort's tax returns? He has nothing to do with my post.

Yes, the link to 2020 came right from Trump and was doubled down on by Mulvaney. Both admitted the quid pro quo to investigate and potentially damage Trump's chief rival. That's a fact,

The transcript released by the White House contains a disclaimer that it isn't a transcript. You should read up on these things. It's a memorandum of the call. Not a transcript.

I don't want something to "be there". I want a corrupt President removed from office. That's where I'm different from you. You actually support Trump's corruption. You were who he was talking about when he said he could commit murder in broad daylight and not lose a single vote. If you think he was complimenting you when he said that, you couldn't be more wrong. He was insulting you. Props for falling right into it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom