Which was in response to this. Which you already know.This is what I was responding too.
It's about innocence or guilt before you have to pay or not. And OJ was found guilty by a jury.
Which was in response to this. Which you already know.
And it simply is not about guilt. That is reserved for criminal trials.
It is about responsibility by preponderance of the evidence.
A low standard of proof.
guilt
noun \ˈgilt\
: responsibility for a crime or for doing something bad or wrong --- my words (as in not fulfilling your contract)
: a bad feeling caused by knowing or thinking that you have done something bad or wrong
Full Definition of GUILT
1
: the fact of having committed a breach of conduct especially violating law and involving a penalty; broadly : guilty conduct
2
a : the state of one who has committed an offense especially consciously
b : feelings of culpability especially for imagined offenses or from a sense of inadequacy : self-reproach
3
: a feeling of culpability for offenses
See guilt defined for English-language learners »
See guilt defined for kids »
Examples of GUILT
The jury determines the defendant's guilt or innocence.
His guilt in the matter was indisputable.
It was clear that the guilt lay with him.
a strong sense of guilt
She feels guilt over something that happened before she was born!
our secret guilts and insecurities
Origin of GUILT
Middle English, delinquency, guilt, from Old English gylt delinquency
First Known Use: before 12th century
Related to GUILT
Synonyms
contriteness, contrition, penitence, regret, remorse, remorsefulness, repentance, rue, self-reproach, shame
Antonyms
impenitence, remorselessness
[+]more
:doh
Civil trials are about responsibility.
:dohYeah, and if you are found responsible you are guilty of not fulling your responsibility.
Read the damn definition
:doh
Not the same thing
Not guilt, liability.
iLOL :doh Not at all.I see you are having a hard time understanding the dictionary
iLOL :doh Not at all.
You are having a hard time distinguishing the difference between civil proceedings and a criminal trial and the type of results that come from such.
You think OJ was found guilty of killing when he clearly was not.
Your position is absurd.
Still having trouble distinguishing between civil proceedings and a criminal trial and the type of results that come from such, huh? Go figure .If you call home and say you will be on at 5 PM, but instead you go to the bar and have a few thus you get home at 9 PM are you guilty of being late?
Still having trouble distinguishing between civil proceedings and a criminal trial and the type of results that come from such, huh? Go figure .
No. I did not run. You are using guilt in a general sense. Not the legal sense of criminal vs civil.Boy you ran from that one. I knew you could not answer that one. Next time bone up a little before you jump in.
Homeowner Who Shot And Killed A Girl On His Porch Found Guilty Of Murder | ThinkProgress
The Detroit-area homeowner who shot in the head 19-year-old Renisha McBride was found guilty of murder Thursday afternoon. The jury found him guilty on all three charges — second-degree murder, manslaughter, and felony firearm — on its second day of deliberations.
.....Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said her office determined that Wafer “did not act in lawful self-defense.”
During the trial, prosecutors probed Wafer’s inconsistent testimony on whether he intended to fire, and questioned why, if he was shooting in fear for his life, he put his gun down by the front door. They also called upon jurors in closing arguments to consider why he didn’t make a more vigorous effort to call the police before turning to his gun, rather than making himself “judge, jury, and executioner.”
I think this is justice served.
Please point out where his story consistently changed.in the fact his story consistenly changed.
Please point out where his story consistently changed.
And the number of times it has changed for you to label it consistently changed.
That in no way means or shows "consistent" change as you claimed.im going by the article,which points out his story had changed.Please point out where his story consistently changed.
And the number of times it has changed for you to label it consistently changed.
Yep the vast majority of people called these one a long times ago when it first happened.
Very easy case, not sure if there was any NEW stuff during the trial but everything that cam out before hand pointed to a bad shoot, negligence and types of charges definitely being filed and him being found guilty.
There was nothing support self defense in the case.
I recognize that far more people saw the abuse of the SYG laws and that blatant disregard this guy exhibited for this little girl's life in what he chose to do. I think the what this story illustrates best is the risks that are posed when the laws are poorly written and/or misunderstood. That risk being people feeling empowered to make life and death decisions on a whim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?