AliHajiSheik
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 12,550
- Reaction score
- 4,369
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Choosing to withhold information that is presented as a source for them is very odd.
How would the story be different for you?
i can't take you serious anymore comparing cancer (which isn't transmittable) to HIV which is.
sperm washing does nothing if the women has HIV.
life expectancy is at least 17 year less than the normal person but is contingent on taking the massive amount of drugs to hold off the disease. it also depends on lifestyle. so it is still shorter by a good bit.
so the only person spreading ignorance is you.
trying to defend what this person did to these people is despicable but what i come to expect from liberals. screw the victim defend the guilty.
I forgot to address your first "point". It's only transmittable within a monogamous relationship if you are a complete moron. Love and marriage aren't supposed to just be about sex you know....which you can still have quite safely within a serodiscordant couple. But if you're too dense to see the cancer analogy, let's try herpes or hepatitis? Either way you look at it HIV is no barrier to marriage for those of us educated on it.i can't take you serious anymore comparing cancer (which isn't transmittable) to HIV which is.
sperm washing does nothing if the women has HIV.
life expectancy is at least 17 year less than the normal person but is contingent on taking the massive amount of drugs to hold off the disease. it also depends on lifestyle. so it is still shorter by a good bit.
so the only person spreading ignorance is you.
trying to defend what this person did to these people is despicable but what i come to expect from liberals. screw the victim defend the guilty.
It would include the facts form their video, you know like all the videos show him with other males only.
Fine, you now suspect that all the victims were male.
No, all the victims in the videos were male. There is no suspecting. Period.
No, all the victims in the videos were male. There is no suspecting. Period.
Fine, why does that fact matter to you in the whole story?
Why does them leaving out facts on purpose matter?
Why does them leaving out facts on purpose matter?
Good Day.
Where did you find these "facts"?
Don't come back.
Did you read the article and watch their source video?
Oh so it was mentioned on the page with the article.
Nope.
Sorry.
For yourself?
No it's accurate, however I must point out that I was referring to western society NOT Africa or Asia. HIV is virtually gone in none risk pools among heterosexuals. The risk lies with heterosexuals that have sex with other heterosexuals that have also had sex with any one of the risk pools. Look it up eco, I would start with the CDC.
Claiming HIV infection is no longer a concern among Western heteros is repugnant.
Claiming HIV infection is no longer a concern among Western heteros is repugnant.
Hopefully he goes to prison for a very long time.
Not to mention ignorant.
Maybe that also. It does seem somewhat uninformed, though.
Claiming HIV infection is no longer a concern among Western heteros is repugnant.
For yourself?
Enthralling.
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?