- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,312
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Fault Lines looks at how Occupy Wall Street went from a small group of New York protesters to a broad people's movement.
In the fall of 2011, New York's Zuccotti Park grabbed the world’s attention as the hub of Occupy Wall Street, a movement that set off a chain of rage against the country’s financial and political elite.Even in the face of police repression and media ridicule, the movement mobilised thousands of people fed up with the deep economic divide in the US. And within two months hundreds of Occupy Wall Street camps swept across the country changing the political discourse in the US."People were upset about the economy, people were upset about the foreclosure crisis, people were upset about the bailouts, and about the fact that it looked like elected officials were working for big business rather than for the people who they’re supposed to be working for," says activist Max Rameau from Take Back the Land.
Fault Lines tells the definitive history of Occupy Wall Street from its early days through the movement's rapid spread up to the brutal crackdown by state authorities.
It was a one sided propaganda film designed to glorify the movement, which explains why it's given so much air time and attention from Al Jazeera.
It painted the OWS protesors as the innocent victims of police agression and didn't mention anything about the violence, destruction of public property, and complete disreguard for the law that so many of them were involved in.
Here's some of the images that they overlooked in that so called documentary:
View attachment 67124582
View attachment 67124584
View attachment 67124585
View attachment 67124586
It was a one sided propaganda film designed to glorify the movement, which explains why it's given so much air time and attention from Al Jazeera.
It painted the OWS protesors as the innocent victims of police agression and didn't mention anything about the violence, destruction of public property, and complete disreguard for the law that so many of them were involved in.
Here's some of the images that they overlooked in that so called documentary:
View attachment 67124582
View attachment 67124584
View attachment 67124585
View attachment 67124586
Are there embarassing photos of individuals from the Tea Party? Do we use those to condemn the whole of the Tea Party movement? Or is this just something you're going to hold to OWS?
In the end, the reason you’ll have to deal with this every time is because you make the same ass backwards generalizations in order to cast the whole of the OWS movement in a light that makes it easier for you to insult and dismiss their message. In the end, this is nothing more than idiotic partisan rhetoric which behooves no one other than the status quo which relies on people being dumb enough to not think about problems, and rather just point fingers to the other side.
Grim no one is saying that some occupiers were violent ( a very very small amount), but the media and you like to paint it as tho the whole entire movement was a violent movement, which is just not true..Again, pure BS... I'm attacked for no other reason than you people don't like the facts. The topic of this thread is the documentary on the OWS movement. The op asked for comments and thoughts on it, and I posted the following:
It painted the OWS protesters as the innocent victims of police aggression and didn't mention anything about the violence, destruction of public property, and complete disregard for the law that so many of them were involved in.
There is no generalization there... So How about you retract you partisan BS? Either that, or you MF'ers stop asking for opinions and bury your heads in the sand and pretend that OWS movement has been ordained by Jesus Christ himself.
Grim no one is saying that some occupiers were violent ( a very very small amount), but the media and you like to paint it as tho the whole entire movement was a violent movement, which is just not true..
Again, pure BS... I'm attacked for no other reason than you people don't like the facts. The topic of this thread is the documentary on the OWS movement. The op asked for comments and thoughts on it, and I posted the following:
It painted the OWS protesters as the innocent victims of police aggression and didn't mention anything about the violence, destruction of public property, and complete disregard for the law that so many of them were involved in.
There is no generalization there... So How about you retract you partisan BS? Either that, or you MF'ers stop asking for opinions and bury your heads in the sand and pretend that OWS movement has been ordained by Jesus Christ himself.
No, you're attacked because you continually make the same dumbass argument. Nothing more, nothing less. Quit trying to play the victim.
[/COLOR][/FONT]
Read more and video @: History of an occupation - Fault Lines - Al Jazeera English
Pretty much a histroy of the movement from the Occupiers point of view. Very interesting but short documentary. Only about 25 min long. Found it very interesting that it really wasnt the Adbusters page that got the movement started, in fact the movement was already started before that little apparently "controversial" page was made
Thoughts?
Comments?
Response? [/LEFT]
wait a minute werent liberals arguing that tea partiers were racists like 5 months ago for what a few people did,so i guess its true,liberals believe one conservative represents all and one liberal is just a bad apple and doesnt count.
But what is the technical term to describe what Flowers is suggesting? It's not just ethical consumerism... maybe it's more along the lines of ethical producerism? What's so extremely fascinating is that she doesn't seem to advocate any practical suggestion that any libertarian would have any reason to oppose. None of her practical suggestions require any legislation to implement! Not only that...but she's basically advocating greater competition. How cool is that? So not only is Flowers' strategy completely immune to even the best libertarian critiques of the Occupy Wall Street Movement...but it's also something that libertarians should embrace and promote.
I had my first run in with the antisemitism issues with some of this movement on Facebook. A lot of people were opposed to it, so it is very much a minority position, but the fact that it showed up at all made me sad.
That said, I still maintain that the best example of OWS are the groups in DC. No problems with vandalism, violence, or bigotry. They stand opposed to war, corporate control, and the hoarding of wealth for the benefit of the few. Ignore those Zuccotti jerks, and look to the Occupiers in DC for the real face of the movement.
Putting the flag to the torch is more an affront to the government behind it, and not the people.It was a one sided propaganda film designed to glorify the movement, which explains why it's given so much air time and attention from Al Jazeera.
It painted the OWS protesors as the innocent victims of police agression and didn't mention anything about the violence, destruction of public property, and complete disreguard for the law that so many of them were involved in.
Here's some of the images that they overlooked in that so called documentary:
View attachment 67124582
This one is actually a pretty bad photoshop job. Take a look at those letters, at how they don't line up with the sign, how they are JUST out of perspective with the rest of the scene, and how much JPG artifacts/noise there is.
Yeah, and OWS is the ONLY place you're EVER gonna find racists...
Well....there aren't very many LEAVES in NYC, are there? Had to use something, didn't he?
Putting the flag to the torch is more an affront to the government behind it, and not the people.
This one is actually a pretty bad photoshop job. Take a look at those letters, at how they don't line up with the sign, how they are JUST out of perspective with the rest of the scene, and how much JPG artifacts/noise there is.
Yeah, and OWS is the ONLY place you're EVER gonna find racists...
Well....there aren't very many LEAVES in NYC, are there? Had to use something, didn't he?
That's the spirit... Make excuses for their behavior rather than acknowledge it.
p.s. that pic was not photoshopped.
That's the spirit... Make excuses for their behavior rather than acknowledge it.
p.s. that pic was not photoshopped.
Where was the excuse that I made? List the phrase that you feel is an excuse for their behavior, lol.
Where was the excuse that I made? List the phrase that you feel is an excuse for their behavior, lol.
The flag burning is a anti-government thing, the second pic was photoshopped and besides, everyone else does it, and he needed to **** somewhere, so whats the big deal.
Ahhh one guy was burning an American flag!! :scared:
Ahhh one guy **** on a cop car :scared:
Ahhh one guy had an anti semitic sign :scared:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?