- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 41,582
- Reaction score
- 31,198
- Location
- Southern England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
...Is how a CNN guest from the Libertarian end of the GOP described their presidential challenger. Liz Mair is almost as outspoken as her target. :lol:
CNN guest says “Trump’s messaging is being a loudmouthed dick.�
Was she asked what her thighness, Hillary Clintonage's message was? If so, might she have also honestly responded, "If you are big enough, you can get away with crime, incompetence and corruption." Hillary is talilor made to fit that description in both size and disreputable notoriety.
Was she asked what her thighness, Hillary Clintonage's message was? If so, might she have also honestly responded, "If you are big enough, you can get away with crime, incompetence and corruption." Hillary is tailor made to fit that description in both size and disreputable notoriety.
And so, is there a reason why you aren't specifically discussing the intent of the thread? Why do you think you should suddenly diverge from that to be the thread police? No offense, but we have moderators here that do that, you are aware, correct? And so, following your own advice, why not stick to the thread, hmmmm?Yes, we're aware of how bad a candidate Clinton is. However, she is not the topic of this thread - Trump is. If you would like to talk about the article from the OP, that's great. If you want to discuss Hillary Clinton, there are a great many threads already discussing her for you to participate in, and room enough for you to make your own.
Was she asked what her thighness, Hillary Clintonage's message was? If so, might she have also honestly responded, "If you are big enough, you can get away with crime, incompetence and corruption." Hillary is tailor made to fit that description in both size and disreputable notoriety.
And so, is there a reason why you aren't specifically discussing the intent of the thread? Why do you think you should suddenly diverge from that to be the thread police? No offense, but we have moderators here that do that, you are aware, correct? And so, following your own advice, why not stick to the thread, hmmmm?
I had a logical question, and as the link showed nothing more of the segment, one could reasonably query if this honest and, balanced, question was ever broached by the notably liberal Cooper, eh?
Yes, we're aware of how bad a candidate Clinton is. However, she is not the topic of this thread - Trump is. If you would like to talk about the article from the OP, that's great. If you want to discuss Hillary Clinton, there are a great many threads already discussing her for you to participate in, and room enough for you to make your own.
Lulz. I fear you ask the impossible from the utterly incapable.
You mean by asking if there was some balance and not just allow a slam to only one side?I see his followers feel better mimicking his stance.
Lulz. I fear you ask the impossible from the utterly incapable.
You mean by asking if there was some balance and not just allow a slam to only one side?
Yep, being a fair minded American, I will take up that cudgel and slam back. Why so offended of someone asking if at least there was an attempt at balance? That would not fit the mold of those backing the lying, corrupt, incompetent and the criminal I guess, now would it?
Ha ha ha, you folks are a joke, but you just are too busy blindly sucking with eyes closed on the kool aide straw to see how comically narrow-minded you truly are.
Was she asked what her thighness, Hillary Clintonage's message was? If so, might she have also honestly responded, "If you are big enough, you can get away with crime, incompetence and corruption." Hillary is tailor made to fit that description in both size and disreputable notoriety.
Its an American presidential campaign with two major candidates... the only reason we are discussing either is precisely because of that, so the two are hopeless intertwined until the vote in November. To try to surgically remove the one from the other from these politically conjoined twins would require that only the bias of the one side be allowed.I wasn't discussing the thread topic because the post I responded to was every bit as off-topic. I find it irritating when people feel the need to bring up other candidates when a discussion specific to someone else is started, and I decided to voice my opinion on that. As for why they didn't discuss Hillary, it's simple - she was not the topic of the discussion. Do you expect Clinton to also attend Trump's interviews so people can ask her questions as well?
We have already seen that one before. Already running summer reruns of your banal opinions? Another joke, just not very funny.
Its an American presidential campaign with two major candidates... the only reason we are discussing either is precisely because of that, so the two are hopeless intertwined until the vote in November. To try to surgically remove the one from the other from these politically conjoined twins would require that only the bias of the one side be allowed.
Maybe skilled surgeon and political commenting by Ben Carson could, though doubtful, achieve this without bias... but Manc, the wrinkly member? Sorry, this is the campaign season, your and his attempt to artificially and antiseptically separate the two are just, well, plain ludicrous.
So stick to it then. You do have that self discipline don't you? No, I guess not.Hillary Clinton ain't the subject. The Donald is.
So stick to it then. You do have that self discipline don't you? No, I guess not.
I have asked you, as well as many others on your side, this before...do you ever post anything of value? Of substance. I see your comments on these threads, and they are thread bare. Never anything of consequence. Give me something to debate on "The Donald" as occasioned by the topic of this thread why don't you? What is there to discuss, you want to go into speculating the actual size or shape or how loud his dick actually is?
Does the loudmouth dick have iron balls attached? That make ya happy, a question like that perhaps?
This is a silly thread and so needed balance obviously easily offends all the wussies backing their witch when confronted with her reality.
And she'd be right about that, too.
By the way, for the clueless among us who don't know who she is, Liz Mair is the person who released those semi-nude photos of Melania Trump during the Utah primaries. Liz Mair, who was a staffer on Scott Walker's Presidential campaign staff. You know...the person you Trumpettes accused of being Ted Cruz.
So stick to it then. You do have that self discipline don't you? No, I guess not.
I have asked you, as well as many others on your side, this before...do you ever post anything of value? Of substance. I see your comments on these threads, and they are thread bare. Never anything of consequence. Give me something to debate on "The Donald" as occasioned by the topic of this thread why don't you? What is there to discuss, you want to go into speculating the actual size or shape or how loud his dick actually is?
Does the loudmouth dick have iron balls attached? That make ya happy, a question like that perhaps?
This is a silly thread and so needed balance obviously easily offends all the wussies backing their witch when confronted with her reality.
...Is how a CNN guest from the Libertarian end of the GOP described their presidential challenger. Liz Mair is almost as outspoken as her target. :lol:
CNN guest says “Trump’s messaging is being a loudmouthed dick.”
"Sweet dodge"? There was no sweet dodge. As it was put, it was a inane question. One for only rhetorical echo by you. And you, if you have any smarts, know it. Plus I gave you the reasoning, which by just mentioning a former "candidate that nobody talks about anymore", you somehow have failed to address. Now that is an actual dodge.Sweet dodge. I asked a simple yes or no question, and you did nothing whatsoever to answer it, although you did make up an excuse or two and bring up a candidate that nobody talks about anymore.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?