• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Is Actually The One Who Won The Low Population States

Moderate Right

Moderate Right

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
55,066
Reaction score
11,189
Location
Kentucky
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations
 
Moderate Right said:
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations
Click to expand...

Link?
 
Moderate Right said:
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations
Click to expand...

DC is a state? And here I thought it was one of the largest cities in the country. Silly me.
 
Moderate Right said:
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations
Click to expand...

People dont count new england
 
Gonzo Rodeo said:
DC is a state? And here I thought it was one of the largest cities in the country. Silly me.
Click to expand...

Taxation without representation in the house or senate .
 
Don't know if I see the relevance here. Hillary lost. It's over. Get over it already. Everyone else has been more than patient about this, and your time has run out.
 
The disingenous OP forgot to mention that trump got one of ME's EVs, as well as the fact that 5 through 9 are also small numbers.

trump won WV-5, NE-5, UT-6, IA-6, AR-6, KS-6, MS-6, OK-7, LA-8, KY-8, AL-9 and SC-9 for a total of 81 EVs.

Clinton only won NM-5, OR-7 and CT-7 for 19 EVs.

Including states mentioned by the OP, trump won states under ten EVs with 101 EVs; while Clinton won states under ten EVs with only 43 EVs. That's a difference of 58 of the overall difference of 74, or 78.4%.

So it is an electoral college and conservative fact that trump won the states with the least populations in overwhelming numbers .
 
eohrnberger said:
Don't know if I see the relevance here. Hillary lost. It's over. Get over it already. Everyone else has been more than patient about this, and your time has run out.
Click to expand...

Why didn't you tell that to the OP by quoting him ?
 
Gonzo Rodeo said:
But DC is a city. It's a large urban center. Of course DC went to Hillary.

Why is it in this list?
Click to expand...

Because DC only has 3 EVs, which helped his bogus math keeping a limit to 3 or 4 EVs. He even forgot that trump won ME-2 .
 
Gonzo Rodeo said:
But DC is a city. It's a large urban center. Of course DC went to Hillary.

Why is it in this list?
Click to expand...

But you didn't read the post. It says "Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC)"
 
Moderate Right said:
Please reread. I did not say that DC was a state.
Click to expand...

Thank you for pointing out that trump won the electoral college 154-83 with states having 11 or less electoral votes, or 71 of the 74 he won by .
 
Moot said:
Link?
Click to expand...

do you really need a link or are you trying to counter his obvious point with a silly request for information that is obvious to anyone?
 
NIMBY said:
Once upon a time, New England was Republican .
Click to expand...

Once upon a time a Democrat said Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country
 
TurtleDude said:
Once upon a time a Democrat said Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country
Click to expand...

Your thread derailing point ?
 
TurtleDude said:
do you really need a link or are you trying to counter his obvious point with a silly request for information that is obvious to anyone?
Click to expand...

There is no point to limiting the discussion to 3 or 4 EVs, as you know .
 
TurtleDude said:
Once upon a time a Democrat said Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country
Click to expand...

And now repubublicks trash his name .
 
Are Trump supporters still trying to relive November 9? Jesus, guys, I know Trump sucks, but get over it. Reliving Clinton's loss isn't going to make him suck any less.
 
NIMBY said:
There is no point to limiting the discussion to 3 or 4 EVs, as you know .
Click to expand...

it was silly for her to ask for information that is blatantly obvious
 
NIMBY said:
And now repubublicks trash his name .
Click to expand...

I'd love having the Democrat nominee next time around be

1) a decorated war hero

2) a guy who wants to massively cut the tax rate

3) an NRA member who bought firearms through the DCM

4) a man who thought the USA needed a "special force" and created the Green Berets
 
TurtleDude said:
it was silly for her to ask for information that is blatantly obvious
Click to expand...

It was a disengenuous thread trying to manipulate data to have low population states cut off at 4 EVs and you know it TurtleDude.

Moderate Right hasn't been able to counter any of my posts, ON TOPIC, including not knowing that ME split its EVs.

You're just in here protecting what you think is one of yours and going after a few favorite targets of yours while derailing the thread .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom