• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton campaign committing wire fraud

ballantine

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
590
Location
Los Angeles
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The Hillary Clinton campaign is committing wire fraud, which is a federal offense - and they know about it, and they refuse to stop.


Blog: Stunning accusation: Hillary campaign ripping off small donors with unauthorized charges

US Bank is only one of many American banks who know about this issue - indeed, have known for quite some time. This bank statement is typical of what they have to deal with about 100 times per day:



Hillary's campaign knows about this. In fact, according to Wells Fargo Bank, her campaign is currently operating exactly like an internet porn site. They too, systematically and fraudulently charge their customers on a recurring basis with unauthorized charges.


Exclusive: Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors | | Observer

==> This is the champion of the little guy?

Nah. Hillary is toast. She's finished. They just caught her systematically ripping off her own constituents.

This is Crooked Hillary in action. This is exactly what we're going to get officially if Hillary Clinton gets elected.

We must stop this lying thieving sack of sh*t at all costs. This woman can not be allowed to set foot back into the White House.
 

Its all bull****.

For one thing, the Mrs. Mahre was overcharged, according to her and her son, by about $119 in a two month time span, $69 the first month, and $50 the second month. But this article claims it was only $94, and then goes on to say how that amount is significant in that it is less that $100 because it would be investigated for fraud. There is no evidence that they investigate for fraud with transactions totaling over $100. Most don't investigate for fraud until you reach $10000. It definitely wouldn't be what we see there. They would have gone over the next month.

Plus, there is no other evidence of this happening. There is one claim from a woman who donates money to Alzheimers (right above the very first campaign donation she made) and each transaction is being taken out on the same day of each month except for the first one and the phone called one. So either this was some sort of setup, or it is possible the woman doesn't know what's she's doing. She likely hit donate twice on the same day, and made one of them a recurring donation rather than a one time donation. I have no idea why she made a call in donation but there's definitely a record of that call somewhere.
 
I don't trust anyone that puts their private bank statement online for all to see. This smells fishy.
 
I don't trust anyone that puts their private bank statement online for all to see. This smells fishy.

Likely a trumped up charge, but even if it's not, I'm not ready to start asking her what she thinks she's doing? I know what she's doing and it's not important enough to stop voting for her or vote for Donald Trump.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…