OK, grab a lawyer and sue Comey and the government, good luck. Trump and many in his administration have already been caught using private cell phones and servers yet you have no problem with any of that. Unless you're ready to retroactively arrest all of the previous secretaries of state like Colin Powell who all did the exact same thing your cries of "lock her up" ring hollow. The justice system is not a weapon for you to use against your political enemies. You've already convicted Clinton in your mind so there's no arguments that could be made. Mueller will keep his investigation going despite your cries.
Did the others that you cite also set up an illegal server, destroy emails AFTER they were subpoenaed, conspire "wipe" the illegal server and conspire to obstruct justice?
Just wondering how severe your partisan selective blindness might be...
I'm not sure who told you that the media can convict someone but that's wildly incorrect. If Mueller brings charges he has a reason to do so and will have to prove it in court. Justice is blind to the emotions of the hysterical.
If the investigation is happening under a republican government then it's either got substance or you should be blaming the republicans for eating their own. Just because Trump has a majority doesn't mean everyone in his administration is immune from prosecution for crimes. That's not how it works.
Yes to all. Did you forget the time the Bush administration deleted hundreds of thousands of emails? Why not stay consistent? Instead you're going to try to give me a bunch of reasons why that doesn't count.
I don't have to wait to condemn Trump, I can do it for whatever reason I like when I like. The justice system on the other hand needs evidence and a conviction. Has Trump been charged with a crime? No? Then what's the problem?I never said the media could convict someone. The operative sword in your post here is “IF.” Conservatives are content to wait for “WHEN.” Trump’s detractors aren’t willing to wait for that. In honesty, tables turned, the right wouldn’t wait for that “when” either.
My post stands.
Conspiracy theory nonsense.That's NOT how it worked under Obama as he led the most corrupt administration in the history of the republic.
What you say seems to indicate that you reject the idea that the Republicans don't see Trump as one of there own. I have seen no evidence to indicate that the Republicans are embracing Trump. It seems pretty obvious that if Trump was removed from office this afternoon, the celebration from the establishment in DC would be unbridled and party affiliation among the partiers would indistinguishable.
That is the whole point, though. The Republicans and the Democrats are the same party.
The staged drama of the make believe opposing ideologies is revealed by the FACT that nothing ever changes.
Have you failed to notice this?
No, not all emails were found, only a lot of them. A tiny fraction of 22 million is still way more than 33,000. So it's OK people in the Bush administration used private email servers and deleted permanently many emails. You have no consistency thus no credibility.In December of 2009, all of the missing Bush Emails were found.
Therefore not destroyed. Therefore not a parallel.
Just sayin'...
The use of email was a pretty new thing in the Bush Administration. The laws were being written to cope with the new technologies as the Bush Administration was moving along.
Not so in the Obama Administration. Email was a widely used and understood medium.
THAT is precisely the reason that Hillary set up the private server in violation of Federal Guidelines put in place to guide the actions that she conducted in violation of the law.
If you desperately want Clinton prosecuted for something, regardless of the facts and evidence, yet don't want Trump prosecuted for anything, regardless of the facts and evidence, it just might be you who has NO MORAL COMPASS.
Keep fantasizing, the rest of us won't hold our breath and Mueller's investigation continues.
If you believe that the President has the right to order investigations into political rivals, then you don't know what abuse of power is and you're regularly confused about why people laugh at banana republics.
Oh, and do tell about Obama ordering the DOJ to investigate his political rivals. This I've go to hear.
Change the term political rivals to criminals, then would you say the DOJ should investigate?
Banana republic dictators would never think to use the term "investigating criminals" when investigating their political rivals. If only they were as imaginative as you.
Just to keep this straight. If the person is a political rival, they can do anything and not be investigated. Is that right?
ROTFLOL... Disastrous? No... it would be WONDERFUL.
Comey made the case against Criminal Hillary, then let her off the hook by using the word “intent”.
Many people convicted of crimes have claimed they did not intend to. Hillary intended to. Everyone knows she intended to. Like the scorpion is born to sting, behaving criminally is in her character.
Hillary coming out and opening her yap on this was the worst things she could have done in her defense. She generates little to no sympathy, and everyone knows she is a criminal who is the beneficiary of a 2-tier justice system.
Corrupt politicians need be locked up to deter future corrupt politicians, and because they are not above the law.
If you desperately want Clinton prosecuted for something, regardless of the facts and evidence, yet don't want Trump prosecuted for anything, regardless of the facts and evidence, it just might be you who has NO MORAL COMPASS.
Keep fantasizing, the rest of us won't hold our breath and Mueller's investigation continues.
OK, grab a lawyer and sue Comey and the government, good luck. Trump and many in his administration have already been caught using private cell phones and servers yet you have no problem with any of that. Unless you're ready to retroactively arrest all of the previous secretaries of state like Colin Powell who all did the exact same thing your cries of "lock her up" ring hollow. The justice system is not a weapon for you to use against your political enemies. You've already convicted Clinton in your mind so there's no arguments that could be made. Mueller will keep his investigation going despite your cries.
Just to keep this straight. If the person is a political rival, they can do anything and not be investigated. Is that right?
Strange, I don't recall the OP even mentioning that Trump shouldn't be investigated. So if you could refrain from putting words in other posters mouths, that would be a decent thing to do.
The "Obama Justice Department" is a cutesy way of acknowledging that Obama didn't order it. It would be like saying "The George W. Bush-administration 911 attack."
Your second link does the exact same thing, and it's worse because it's an opinion piece.
The Daily Wire? Oh, Jesus Christ...
Try again.
Do you or do you not agree that if the law is broken that a proper investigation be conducted?
or do you believe in a 2 tiered justice system as long as there is a D in front of their name.
Lol, yes, I assumed that the most partisan Trumpite on this forum, who spends all of his time here screaming about Hillary and gargling Trump's balls does not think Trump should be investigated. Not much of a leap, especially when he's said it in other threads.
You can keep complaining but the first two sets of charges have been brought against Trump officials and more are sure to come. So just grab some popcorn and watch how it all plays out.
Banana republic dictators would never think to use the term "investigating criminals" when investigating their political rivals. If only they were as imaginative as you.
Yeah, just disregard the citations, and say its all crap... that's what all the other regressive people are doing these days.
He was right thought, you are hanging way too hard on this red-herring target of yours. The desperation is almost palpable.
Just answer the question. Here, I'll even repost it to jog your memory.
Please do try to stay on track this time.
No, not all emails were found, only a lot of them. A tiny fraction of 22 million is still way more than 33,000. So it's OK people in the Bush administration used private email servers and deleted permanently many emails. You have no consistency thus no credibility.
So far there is no evidence that trump has broken any laws.
there is a whole ton of evidence that Clinton broke the law.
Comey spent 30-45 minutes laying out all the evidence.
Unfortunately Come chose politics over doing his job. He should be charged with obstruction of justice.
I couldn't identify an actual crime that started this investigation myself.
It appears that you cannot do so either.
That's only one of the very many things that makes this investigating so interesting.
I find it interesting that the Republican controlled Federal Government is attacking the Republican President by this method as well as so many others.
Just shows, AGAIN, that we do not have two political parties. We have one establishment political organization that strives to maintain its power.
Trump is outside the fold and is therefore a target of the two halves of the establishment party.
Has there been a Democrat President attacked by his own party while they held the majority in both Houses and controlled the White House?
I can't seem to recall this having happened. Maybe you can recall an example.
Just because you wish it were so, doesn't make it true.
Yep, Trump supporters are "anti-establishment". You're a true Trump supporter, you've checked that box.
Democrats will criticize a "Democrat president", when that "Democrat president" behaves like a childish wannabe dictator that openly profits from his own presidency, and puts starkly unqualified people in positions of power.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?