• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

High Schoolers Accused Of Sending Naked Pictures To Each Other

Thorgasm

Bus Driver to Hell
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
69,534
Reaction score
15,450
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
GREENSBURG, Pa. -- Three teenage girls who allegedly sent nude or semi-nude cell phone pictures of themselves, and three male classmates in a Greensburg Salem High School who received them, are charged with child pornography.

Police said the girls are 14 or 15, and the boys charged with receiving the photos are 16 or 17. None are being identified because most criminal cases in Pennsylvania juvenile courts are not public.

"It was a self portrait taken of a juvenile female taking pictures of her body, nude," said Capt. George Seranko of the Greensburg Police Department.

Police said school officials learned of the photos in October. That's when a student was seen using a cell phone during school hours, which violates school rules. The phone was seized, and the photos were found on it, police said. When police investigated, other phones with more pictures were seized.

High Schoolers Accused Of Sending Naked Pictures To Each Other - News Story - WPXI Pittsburgh

Why are school officials going through the content on student's cell phones?

Did I commit a crime when I was 15 and had sex with another 15 year old?
 
This also brings up another question. Aren't the boys being entrapped?

What if they sent the pics to their principal? Would he go to jail?
 
Why are school officials going through the content on student's cell phones?

Did I commit a crime when I was 15 and had sex with another 15 year old?

I think this new trend of teens texting risque photos to one another is in the long run going to be a positive thing for society.
It's time we amended some arbitrary and archaic nonsense laws involving teens and sexuality.
The marriage age needs to be raised to 18 in every state, with no caveats for "parental consent", which all too often translates to parental coercion.
And simultaneously, the age of sexual consent needs to be standardized among states (and also lowered, in my opinion, in many states; 17 and 18 are outrageous).

In Texas, a decade ago, minors could work in adult entertainment with parental consent. I danced on the same stage with 16 year olds. They just had to wear special wristbands and couldn't drink.
I wouldn't be surprised if that law has changed by now.

I think something (although I don't know what) needs to change about society's approach to teen mothers; teen parenthood really does look like an attractive option to young people who are desperate for more freedom and independence. The state grants young women a sort of unofficial "emancipated" status when they become mothers, and they have a lot more privileges and freedoms than they had before.
I do not think that the answer is to penalize teen moms (because one really can't effectively parent without having a lot more freedom and adult privileges than the average, non-parent minor has), but rather to extend these freedoms to all teenagers.

I understand the fears about child pornography. Nobody wants children victimized. But teens aren't children, and when they take naked pictures of themselves, that isn't pornography. When they view thmeselves naked in the shower, do you think they're viewing pornography? It's just their body. Nudity isn't necessarily pornography.

I believe it reflects poor judgement on the part of the teens. They should be made aware, possibly by a special school assembly or guest speaker in health class, of the potential consequences of distributing nude pictures of oneself. One doesn't know whose hands these pictures might fall into. they could come back and embarrass one later in life. They might harm one's future career, and cause one untold social embarrassment, if they fell into the wrong hands. Teens can understand this. They understand the threat of social embarrassment. They need to be made aware that they are being naive if they believe that whoever they are sending these pictures to will be honorable and not broadcast them to others.

But as far as legal ramifications? No.
This is preposterous and needs to stop now.
This trend of sending nude or risque images via text and email is ubiquitous among teens right now.
Look how many allegedly "wholesome" celebrity teens have been busted doing it. Miley Cyrus, Vanessa Hudgens.
Legal consequences resulting in jail time are not the appropriate approach to this issue.

The combination of teens and technology should force adults- parents, social leaders, legislators- to sit down and re-evaluate our whole approach to this matter, and to the larger matter of teen sexuality in general.

Teens not only are sexual beings, they wish to be recognized as such. They are trying to grow up. They are not children. They do not wish to be treated like children. Who would want to be treated like a child? Children have no civil rights; they're hardly better than slaves or second-class citizens in our society, despite out "protectionist" attitude toward them.
The more society denies adolescent sexuality, the more adolescents are going to keep rubbing society's nose in it.
 
Last edited:
The marriage age needs to be raised to 18 in every state, with no caveats for "parental consent", which all too often translates to parental coercion.

We don't need a one size fits all solution to this issue. Why don't you stop trying to interfere in governments that you aren't a part of for a change. That's what needs to be done.
 
We don't need a one size fits all solution to this issue. Why don't you stop trying to interfere in governments that you aren't a part of for a change. That's what needs to be done.

I don't know what you're talking about.
I'll interfere all I want.
 
Bring it on.

:bringit

I think that is the direction the nation is headed eventually.

I don't give your side much chance in the fight either. :mrgreen:
 
I think that is the direction the nation is headed eventually.

I don't give your side much chance in the fight either. :mrgreen:

Oh, yeah. The conservative Right sure is intimidating these days.
Be afraid, be very afraid. :roll:

You guys are so irrelevant nobody's even bothering to pander to you anymore.
 
Oh, yeah. The conservative Right sure is intimidating these days.
Be afraid, be very afraid. :roll:

You guys are so irrelevant nobody's even bothering to pander to you anymore.

The experiment in central planning will end in our lifetimes, and it will end badly for you.
 
The experiment in central planning will end in our lifetimes, and it will end badly for you.

I'm a pissant in the grand scheme of things.
Nothing's going to change for me, regardless.
I've got very little personal stake in anything.
 
I'm a pissant in the grand scheme of things.
Nothing's going to change for me, regardless.
I've got very little personal stake in anything.

That is easily the most agreeable thing you have ever said on this forum.

But if things you have said in the past are accurate, things will most definitely change for you. The age of personal responsibility will return again.
 
She's a US citizen. Why isn't she a part of the government?

states should retain sovereignty.

If 1069 had her way, she would wage war with Mexico to legalize abortion. She would force the age of marriage based on her views on the entire globe.
 
That is easily the most agreeable thing you have ever said on this forum.

But if things you have said in the past are accurate, things will most definitely change for you. The age of personal responsibility will return again.

Why would anything change for me? What 'things I've said in the past"?
My children are grown up. I'm practically middle-aged.
I work and sit around on the computer.
What do you think is going to change for me?
Are Christians going to kick in my door and force me to go to church or something? :roll:
 
The marriage age needs to be raised to 18 in every state, with no caveats for "parental consent", which all too often translates to parental coercion.
And simultaneously, the age of sexual consent needs to be standardized among states (and also lowered, in my opinion, in many states; 17 and 18 are outrageous).

I disagree with this.

While I believe that both the age of consent and the age of legal marriage should be standardized and should not allow for "parental consent"-- ****ing minefield-- I believe that they should be the same age. An adult is an adult, and someone who is allowed to engage in adult behaviors should also be allowed to make adult commitments.

Especially when those adult behaviors can lead directly to other adult commitments of the kind we have no business legally prohibiting.

I think something (although I don't know what) needs to change about society's approach to teen mothers; teen parenthood really does look like an attractive option to young people who are desperate for more freedom and independence.

My opinion is that it should be normalized. Societal norms should revert to expecting grandparents to take an active role in raising young children, while their young adult offspring assist where they can and work to contribute to the household.

I agree in full with the rest of your post.
 
Why would anything change for me? What 'things I've said in the past"?
My children are grown up. I'm practically middle-aged.
I work and sit around on the computer.
What do you think is going to change for me?
Are Christians going to kick in my door and force me to go to church or something? :roll:

How much help you plan on getting from the state in your senior years?

I recall you once bragging about how even if you have the resources to provide for yourself, you would use state aid when available. It's this attitude that leads me to believe the future will not be kind to you.
 
How much help you plan on getting from the state in your senior years?

I recall you once bragging about how even if you have the resources to provide for yourself, you would use state aid when available. It's this attitude that leads me to believe the future will not be kind to you.

My family- what's left of it- is sitting on a good-sized fortune- our "money farm".
There are only two heirs, and one is gay and probably won't ever have any children.
I imagine that between the two of us and my children, we'll all be well provided for.
I've been told not to worry about social security or retirement funds, as I won't need them. I've been told that it isn't something I need to take into consideration when deciding what sort of work I want to do.
I've also been told that I need to work and take care of myself, so that's what I do, even though nobody else in the family does.

It really doesn't matter to me one way or the other whether I do inherit anything, though; I don't want to live after the rest of my family is dead.
No amount of money will make living in this world worthwhile to me if they're not in it.
So I try not to think much about the distant future.
I live very much in the present.
 
My family- what's left of it- is sitting on a good-sized fortune- our "money farm".
There are only two heirs, and one is gay and probably won't ever have any children.
I imagine that between the two of us and my children, we'll all be well provided for.
I've been told not to worry about social security or retirement funds, as I won't need them. I've been told that it isn't something I need to take into consideration when deciding what sort of work I want to do.
I've also been told that I need to work and take care of myself, so that's what I do, even though nobody else in the family does.

It really doesn't matter to me one way or the other whether I do inherit anything, though; I don't want to live after the rest of my family is dead.
No amount of money will make living in this world worthwhile to me if they're not in it.
So I try not to think much about the distant future.
I live very much in the present.

your inheritance is not safe because the country is full of people like....well....you. When things get tough, the first thing they will do is take over this excess you think is waiting for you.

You have kids, why would your family be dead before you though?
 
your inheritance is not safe because the country is full of people like....well....you. When things get tough, the first thing they will do is take over this excess you think is waiting for you.

You have kids, why would your family be dead before you though?

Not that family.
The older generation. The conservators of the family money.
Why would I inherit money from my kids? :roll:

Although one of my sons has just entered the army, and has informed me that there's a 400 thousand dollar life insurance policy on him now.
I about gagged when I heard that, too.
If he dies, I don't want to live, not even if the insurance pays out 4 million dollars.

I don't mind working and taking care of myself, I like it. i've always done it. I don't mind living poor. i've always done that too. I don't mind doing it for the rest of my life, just living in a little apartment. I don't care if I have a vehicle or not.
But what I do care about is losing any member of my family. I can't concieve of wanting to go on living if that happened.
Whatever quality of life I have depends upon having them all alive and healthy and safe. It does not depend on money. I don't need money.
So.
 
Not that family.
The older generation. The conservators of the family money.
Why would I inherit money from my kids? :roll:

You said I don't want to live after the rest of my family is dead.

Why would your kids be dead?
 
You said I don't want to live after the rest of my family is dead.

Why would your kids be dead?

I devoutly hope they won't be dead, at least not before I am.
But they're not "the rest of my family".
They're just part of it.
There are eight of us, total, including my husband, who i also consider family.
I don't want any of them to die before me.
 
Has this some relation to the thread topic, "High Schoolers Accused Of Sending Naked Pictures To Each Other"?
I've been patiently waiting for you to close the loop somehow, but we only seem to be going further afield here.
I think 1069 Q&A Time is done now.
 
I devoutly hope they won't be dead, at least not before I am.
But they're not "the rest of my family".
They're just part of it.
There are eight of us, total, including my husband, who i also consider family.
I don't want any of them to die before me.

If your kids survive, the rest of your family is not dead.

Do those holding on to your potential estate understand your views on how society has every right to take that money away from them and distribute it to the more needy?
 
Has this some relation to the thread topic, "High Schoolers Accused Of Sending Naked Pictures To Each Other"?
I've been patiently waiting for you to close the loop somehow, but we only seem to be going further afield here.
I think 1069 Q&A Time is done now.

About as much as your rant on normalizing the age of marriage. You went on a tangent and I am criticizing that tangent. You can bow out at anytime of course.
 
Back
Top Bottom