• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Here's Your Second GOP Debate Field......

clownboy said:
Santorum has no governing experience whatsoever.
Click to expand...

He was at least a U.S. Representative and a ranking U.S. Senator for 16 years cumulatively.

CNN is currently operating under the assumption that 57% of Republican voters endorse at least one of three candidates who have never once held political office of any ​rank. How damn sad is that?
 
Fiddytree said:
He was at least a U.S. Representative and a ranking U.S. Senator for 16 years cumulatively.

CNN is currently operating under the assumption that 57% of Republican voters endorse at least one of three candidates who have never once held political office of any ​rank. How damn sad is that?
Click to expand...


Well, what did you expect from the Clinton New Network? You weren't looking for an actual News Source from them, were you?
 
MMC said:
Well, what did you expect from the Clinton New Network? You weren't looking for an actual News Source from them, were you?
Click to expand...

This would perhaps be a remark that could be debated if not cautiously granted, if not for its lack of consideration for the debate's methods for selecting candidates. It's a cumulation of available polling data, not CNN's blind ambitions. Likewise, were this CNN's fault, you would have to convince the bulk of the Republican Party primary voter, who are at the very least willing to play along with the data if not outright celebrating it.

For the moment, at least, the mob of ignorance and inexperience is overwhelming the serious work of furthering a political Party's ambitions and that of the public interest. If there is an example of the delirium in democracy, it is this.
 
Fiddytree said:
This would perhaps be a remark that could be debated if not cautiously granted, if not for its lack of consideration for the debate's methods for selecting candidates. It's a cumulation of available polling data, not CNN's blind ambitions. Likewise, were this CNN's fault, you would have to convince the bulk of the Republican Party primary voter, who are at the very least willing to play along with the data if not outright celebrating it.

For the moment, at least, the mob of ignorance and inexperience is overwhelming the serious work of furthering a political Party's ambitions and that of the public interest. If there is an example of the delirium in democracy, it is this.
Click to expand...


Some have questioned the method with all of the MS media, let alone with those like CNN and Cable News. Allowing the Media to dictate any course.....was always the problem.
 
MMC said:
Some have questioned the method with all of the MS media, let alone with those like CNN and Cable News. Allowing the Media to dictate any course.....was always the problem.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. If the media can be blamed for Romney when it was actually the collective lack of wisdom of the Tea Party bloc being unable to coalesce around a single candidate when it mattered the most, then it must be pointed out that the media can't be blamed when it is Tea Party populism that has brought us to this point.
 
Fiddytree said:
Nonsense. If the media can be blamed for Romney when it was actually the collective lack of wisdom of the Tea Party bloc being unable to coalesce around a single candidate when it mattered the most, then it must be pointed out that the media can't be blamed when it is Tea Party populism that has brought us to this point.
Click to expand...

No its not nonsense allowing the MS media to dictate any course. The MS Media didn't have to vet 16-17 candidates when Romney ran in 2012.

You will need to come up with some other terminology. As nonsense doesn't even apply.
 
I won't be watching. 11 on stage is too arbitrary. Might as well have everyone up there.
 
reinoe said:
I won't be watching. 11 on stage is too arbitrary. Might as well have everyone up there.
Click to expand...

What about the lower tier debate? Won't be 11 there and Gilmore wasn't even invited.
 
MMC said:
What does Santorum have to offer Fiddy? Graham is only useful for Foreign Policy.
Click to expand...

"I'll take absolutely nothing for $200 Alex."
 
azgreg said:
"I'll take absolutely nothing for $200 Alex."
Click to expand...

:alert dingdingding :july_4th: ......and you have hit the daily double. :ind:


This will be an all in wager correct?





What 4 Presidents walked in the actual shoes of our Founding Fathers. :2razz:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom