Hegseth is trying to keep women out of the military

[ColdHardTruth]

What do you expect from a stupid drunkard?

A stupid, racist, confederate drunkard that sees women as property.

 

[Cosmo]

It was called the Defense Advisory Committee on Wonen in the Services. It dealt with recruitment and retention and treatment. Pete H saw it as woke. It coincided with the dismissal or replacement of several women in top military positions.

So what's your problem with it? The coincidence that happened when "Pete H saw it as woke?"

 

[Cosmo]

I never claimed any knowledge of military standards

And then you demonstrated said lack of knowledge.

The requirements dont matter, as long as they're equal.

You like to try and "baffle with bullshit" but you cant hide behind it.



See...you couldnt manipulate the conversation where you wanted to...

I introduced inconvenient and complicated (for you) facts to the discussion and you couldn't handle it, so you're insisting we ignore that and dumb it down to a level you can handle. Sorry, not doing that!

I kept it very civil and tried to clarify it politely...and you are unable to comprehend the actual basis for it (or dont like the implications) so you make it about me and run away.

That's your general M.O.

 

[Lursa]

And then you demonstrated said lack of knowledge.

Where? Quote it. As it affected the point I made. Come on...put up or ...?

I introduced inconvenient and complicated (for you) facts to the discussion and you couldn't handle it, so you're insisting we ignore that and dumb it down to a level you can handle. Sorry, not doing that!

They were not needed. Look at you, fluffing your own ability to google irrelevant information And so defensive!

 

[Nickyjo]

So what's your problem with it? The coincidence that happened when "Pete H saw it as woke?"

It served us since Truman. Why get rid of it?

 

[Hamish Howl]

So what's your problem with it? The coincidence that happened when "Pete H saw it as woke?"

Coincidence my entire ass.

 

[Cosmo]

It served us

What does that mean? Are you implying it was a good thing because the country didn't collapse? That's a pretty low bar.

since Truman. Why get rid of it?

 

[Nickyjo]

What does that mean? Are you implying it was a good thing because the country didn't collapse? That's a pretty low bar.

What is wrong with an agency that deals with what they handled, as I mentioned in a previous post? Pete H has offered no explanation for getting rid of something that has been around under several presidents and Secretaries of Defense.

 

[Cosmo]

What is wrong with an agency that deals with what they handled, as I mentioned in a previous post? Pete H has offered no explanation for getting rid of something that has been around under several presidents and Secretaries of Defense.

Didn't I quote him in post 3?

 

[Nickyjo]

Didn't I quote him in post 3?

I checked post 3. Still don’t understand. Why get rid of this agency?

 

[Questerr]

How did you objectively determine that "the military would entirely fall apart?"

Because no military can function after it loses a considerable part of its senior leadership or support functions.

 

[Cosmo]

I checked post 3. Still don’t understand. Why get rid of this agency?

I'm not really even sure what it does.

https://dacowits.defense.gov/

Looks like some "advisory committee" that writes reports specific to women. If women are to pass the same standards as men going forward, why do we need it? Can't a general, gender-neutral committee do this stuff going forward?

 

[Cosmo]

Because no military can function after it loses a considerable part of its senior leadership or support functions.

Perhaps we'll use the same approach to determine the importance of individual service members.

 

[Questerr]

Perhaps we'll use the same approach to determine the importance of individual service members.

Except the measure of individuals and the measure of a huge proportion are not comparable.