Just link a credible source showing that construction has actually stopped, not delayed
but wik hasn't published it yet
LOL!
round and round makes one dizzy
is that why you don't recognize claire mccaskill when she's LINKED right in front of you
LOL!
It doesn't matter who you quote.
it doesn't?
LOL!
even when she's the senator from missouri?
McCaskill moves away from mandate - David Catanese - POLITICO.com
says the 60 second clicker who disparages politico and the dallas morning news while simultaneously pushing wik over the cbc
LOL!
LOL!
it sure does to obama
he's all for the mandate
gee, i wonder what physician owned hospitals are sposed to do when they're BANNED from receiving medicare and medicaid reimbursements
No, it does not matter.
LOL!
it sure does to obama
he's all for the mandate
gee, i wonder what physician owned hospitals are sposed to do when they're BANNED from receiving medicare and medicaid reimbursements
I have not at anytime disparaged the Dallas Morning News.
Even if it matter to Obama
oh, just the cbc, huh?
LOL!
Don't know enough about CBC to know if it is nonbaised.
and there ya go
the guy who doesn't know enough about the cbc to say whether or not the "npr of the crown" is or isn't biased STILL prefers a source anyone of us can edit
tells ya all ya need to know
yes I took wiki over the CBC
Don't know enough about CBC to know if it is nonbaised.
meanwhile, obamacare BANS medicare and medicaid reimbursements to doctor owned hospitals
which, whether they're delayed or halted, certainly can't be very beneficial to em
I'm sure you've already figured this out, but you're wasting your time with this character. He is insincere and dishonest. He disparages everyones sources but his own and won't accept any proof, no matter how reputable.
He recently tried to tell me that my sources were not credible because people he had talked on the street said otherwise. See how dishonest he is ??
You might try accually addressing me, or the issue. Prof has it completely wrong, misrepresenting what was said, cutting up quotes to not show the context. You can join him if you like, but it would be just as dishonest.
And that is not what I told you. Didn't I suggest then I could point you to a reading instructor?
No, the Prof and I both have it right. But thanks for proving my original point.
:coffeepap
No, you just can't really argue an issue, so you resort to this tactic, weak as it is.
I posted this on the other thread as well as posted it yesterday, looks to me like you ignored it just like you ignore anything else that contradicts your opinions. Here is why the CBO numbers are wrong. Pay attention to the assumptions and tell me why you don't agree?
Review & Outlook: ObamaCare's Reality Deficit - WSJ.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?