Your response has nothing to do with what I said. I never singled out a particular attack for criticism and I have not supported the mission of any terrorist, that is an outright lie. As I mentioned, I supported the raid to capture Bin Laden, which disproves your contention since he "bragged about being the mastermind of a suicide attack."
If you want to argue that your approve of:
- secretly authorized remote control killing of terrorism suspects anywhere in the world
- with no pretense of due process (fair trial]
- with no intent to capture the suspect and put him on trial
- even when many of them are not a threat to the USA because they are only involved in their own nation's civil war
- away from a battlefield
- when they are not an imminent threat which could justify a self defense claim
- and with a probability that innocent civilians will be killed and wounded
- and there is a strong chance that the resulting death of innocent civilians will create blowback
go ahead.
But your false claims about my sympathies do not support your argument, they are only a distraction from the truth about your opinion.
Will you still claim that such actions are acceptable if China uses a drone or other means to kill someone residing in the USA because they claim that they are a Tibetan terrorist?