- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The killer is in prison, not out manning some crimewatch thingy. See the difference?
Not going to re-litigate that - it's over, the jury made their decision so deal with it. I'm simply pointing out why the Martin case got national attention and why Trapuzzano's case is not getting widespread national attention.
The killer is in prison, not out manning some crimewatch thingy. See the difference?
Because the only way there's any similarity between the two is if you're making it about race. The only similarity is that the shooter and victim are of different races. That's it! So unless you are focusing on the victim being white, there's nothing there.
Because the only way there's any similarity between the two is if you're making it about race. The only similarity is that the shooter and victim are of different races. That's it! So unless you are focusing on the victim being white, there's nothing there.
I think the point is and has been that because the guy killed was white, no one gives a ****. If the races were switched, this would be the Martin case all over again.
I think the point is and has been that because the guy killed was white, no one gives a ****. If the races were switched, this would be the Martin case all over again.
Same as what happened...
That's because the Jewish media is covering up the secret race war.
Wake up, white people. Fight back!
:roll:
Maybe there was a point to your post, but I have no idea what it is. Maybe someone who has an issues with Jews would be interested.
You're right.
One got national attention. The other didn't.
I think the point is and has been that because the guy killed was white, no one gives a ****. If the races were switched, this would be the Martin case all over again.
So, you're not aware of the standard neo-nazi call to violence?
1. Claim blacks are slaughtering and torturing whites. Include an emotionally charged story.
2. Claim the media (Jewish, of course), is covering up this race war to the detriment of whites.
3. ?
4. Profit.
Every racist group does that. It's what you're doing, consciously or not.
No I'm not familiar with them, nor do I care. I'm not a neo-Nazi.
You still might want to know what they do, and that you are (presumably unknowingly) doing the same.
Perhaps you didn't read my prior posts on the matter.So now we're back to making it about race? Jeez, when I said it was race baiting, it was all "No, it's not about that." Now it is.
How exactly?If the races were switched, it would be different because it's a different situation altogether.
Am I claiming there not a big difference? Who are you arguing with other than yourself?Unless you want to tell me that Zimmerman was trying to rob Martin? Look, if a white guy robbed and killed a black guy and was arrested for doing so, what would be the controversy? Reverse the races, and you've got this case. There's no "there" there. Take race out of it, which I thought Conservatives wanted to do in all cases, and you've got this: One person robbed and killed another person. The perp was arrested and awaits trial. That's a BIG difference from Z/M.
Perhaps you didn't read my prior posts on the matter.
How exactly?
Am I claiming there not a big difference? Who are you arguing with other than yourself?
The comparison on race is obvious, yet you want to ignore it. Why?The only way it is possibly relevant to Z/M is IF you bring race into it. Leave race out, and there's no similarity at all.
No one of consequence.Who are you arguing with?
It is completely different except where it applies to race. Why is it okay to bring race into it with Martin and not here?If we agree that it's completely different in almost any respect, then maybe that's why it gets different treatment by the press.
Not at all. I made no comments about Jews. None. I also never claimed blacks are slaughtering whites. Ever.
You claimed that crimes by blacks against whites are being ignored by the media, while crimes by whites against blacks are sensationalized for days. This is, in fact, a claim of media bias to the effect of covering up a race war.
But that part of the routine serves a second purpose. In the claim that white on black crimes are sensationalized in the media is also a promise of fame for action.
I never said anything about a race war,
Look, I'm NOT saying that you're a nazi! Ok? I'm saying that the "media cover up of black crimes and sensationalizing of white crimes" is part of a racist call to violence routine.
One either sees it or one does not. Obviously you do not, but I believe you can.
But I don't care what those people say or do.
That explains why you would support their narrative unknowingly. That does not excuse you from continuing to do so.
Maybe there was a point to your post, but I have no idea what it is. Maybe someone who has an issues with Jews would be interested.
Stop with snippeting out my posts and ignoring the parts that show your narrative to be BS.
Now back to your proof that I said there is a race war or a Jew cover up in the media, here or anywhere else. Where is it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?