- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He basically says that Roe is gone because it was not enumerated directly in the constitution.
No, all that stuff is supposedly supporting documentation for his conclusion that the right to abortion isn't enumerated in the constitution.Where do you get this from? Clearly not from a reading of the draft decision.
Here let me help you with a link to the draft:
One issue discussed is how those prior decisions on abortion are not actually founded in the Constitution.
But that is not the only thing SCOTUS looks at.
It also reviews legal history, legislative history among the States, and most especially the disussions and debates that created Constitutional Amendments to show what they were meant to protect/represent.
The rest of your post is just hyperbole, and not worthy of a response.
It’s a result looking for support and not the other way around.No, all that stuff is supposedly supporting documentation for his conclusion that the right to abortion isn't enumerated in the constitution.
He basically says that Roe is gone because it was not enumerated directly in the constitution.
So will the right wingers choose those cases that fit their right wing and religious agenda and strike down federal laws that fit that agenda. Gays, mixed race marriages, and gay marriages are not mentioned directly in the constitution, so that could be a start, but there could be many more areas they may reach decisions on that will limit or end citizens rights they now have that could end with this court. Can you think of other rights that are not enumerated in the constitution that could be overturned by this right wing controlled court?
No, no no - he's on to us.Where do you get this from? Clearly not from a reading of the draft decision.
Here let me help you with a link to the draft:
One issue discussed is how those prior decisions on abortion are not actually founded in the Constitution.
But that is not the only thing SCOTUS looks at.
It also reviews legal history, legislative history among the States, and also the disussions and debates that created Constitutional Amendments to show what they were meant to protect/represent.
The rest of your post is just hyperbole, and not worthy of a response.
It’s a result looking for support and not the other way around.
It’s a result looking for support and not the other way around.
Fact is abortion is not in the Constitution - SCOTUS had to create "Prenumbras and eminencies to invent that right. Those other you listed come directly fro the "equal justice for all". Which is the Constitutional principle - "Separate but equal" has already been abolished.He basically says that Roe is gone because it was not enumerated directly in the constitution. So will the right wingers choose those cases that fit their right wing and religious agenda and strike down federal laws that fit that agenda. Gays, mixed race marriages, and gay marriages are not mentioned directly in the constitution, so that could be a start, but there could be many more areas they may reach decisions on that will limit or end citizens rights they now have that could end with this court. Can you think of other rights that are not enumerated in the constitution that could be overturned by this right wing controlled court?
The right to marriage, travel and presumption of innocence are three I can think of off the top of my head.He basically says that Roe is gone because it was not enumerated directly in the constitution. So will the right wingers choose those cases that fit their right wing and religious agenda and strike down federal laws that fit that agenda. Gays, mixed race marriages, and gay marriages are not mentioned directly in the constitution, so that could be a start, but there could be many more areas they may reach decisions on that will limit or end citizens rights they now have that could end with this court. Can you think of other rights that are not enumerated in the constitution that could be overturned by this right wing controlled court?
Neither is that money equals free speech, it also was a right made up by the court. You do realize that in this decision, Alito based it partly on an English judge who put women to death for being witches and said that men could not rape their wives.Fact is abortion is not in the Constitution - SCOTUS had to create "Prenumbras and eminencies to invent that right. Those other you listed come directly fro the "equal justice for all". Which is the Constitutional principle - "Separate but equal" has already been abolished.
I got one. Big with extreme right wingers.He basically says that Roe is gone because it was not enumerated directly in the constitution. So will the right wingers choose those cases that fit their right wing and religious agenda and strike down federal laws that fit that agenda. Gays, mixed race marriages, and gay marriages are not mentioned directly in the constitution, so that could be a start, but there could be many more areas they may reach decisions on that will limit or end citizens rights they now have that could end with this court. Can you think of other rights that are not enumerated in the constitution that could be overturned by this right wing controlled court?
You do realize you're spewing the most idiotic nonsense imaginable?Neither is that money equals free speech, it also was a right made up by the court. You do realize that in this decision, Alito based it partly on an English judge who put women to death for being witches and said that men could not rape their wives.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?