• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Has "Bridgegate" eliminated Chris Christie's chances for president?

Has "Bridgegate" eliminated Chris Christie's chances for president?


  • Total voters
    66

I'm not sure you can compare voters' attention span re the federal shutdown to a juicy, personal-character dramarama.
 
I'm not sure you can compare voters' attention span re the federal shutdown to a juicy, personal-character dramarama.
Perhaps Clinton would be a more relevant comparison. Regardless, unless Christie is shown to have had direct involvement in the affair, I predict this to be a non-issue in the long run.
 
He claims he had nothing to do with the bridge closure, it was his aide that did it.

Yes, He's toast

No, he's still in the running

I Don't Know




It's certainly a bump in the road, but I am inclined to believe that the big guy can put this behind him.

I won't believe that he's done until he says that he's done.
 
I have been out of the media loop, but aside from the one connected death, I don't know if this has staying power. Christie has to have direct knowledge, and the story has to be sexy enough.
 
 
Last edited:
He claims he had nothing to do with the bridge closure, it was his aide that did it.

Yes, He's toast

No, he's still in the running

I Don't Know

Christie was superb today: honest, forthright and accountable. I will support him for POTUS in 2016.eace
 
 
Christie was superb today: honest, forthright and accountable. I will support him for POTUS in 2016.eace
I agree, he did a great job. I think when he talked about him joking about it several weeks ago did the trick.
 
Christie was superb today: honest, forthright and accountable. I will support him for POTUS in 2016.eace
Democratic strategist, Bob Shrum said earlier, that he thought this controversy and the way Christie handled it will help him.
 
Last edited:
Democratic strategist, Bob Shrum said earlier, that he thought this controversy and the way Christie handled it will help him.

I suppose that's good news, but IIRC Shrum has never been associated with a winning POTUS campaign.eace
 
He claims he had nothing to do with the bridge closure, it was his aide that did it.

Yes, He's toast

No, he's still in the running

I Don't Know

I don't know, I watched him on CNN and listened to a couple of their pundits. They think he did the right thing in apologizing and firing the guy. They also think he is home free unless another smoking gun is found that ties it directly to him. At least as far as they are concerned, the bridge closing is behind him. For now as they put it. I tend to believe them. I know democrats will try to tar him for this and republicans will say it is no big deal, he's innocent and just a product of a democratic witch hunt. But I am not sure how independents will view this whole thing.

But I will worry about independents later. I am still not sure if Christie can win in the Republican primaries and all of this is moot if he doesn't. Christie probably has more to worry about him embracing President Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy than the bridge closing.
 
 
The man has spoken against the 1964 Civil Rights Act,that will not be forgotten and it will cost him a lot of votes.

You mean against title seven?
 
He claims he had nothing to do with the bridge closure, it was his aide that did it.

Yes, He's toast

No, he's still in the running

I Don't Know

If so, it would speed the Republican Party along to their doom.

But probably not.
 
The man has spoken against the 1964 Civil Rights Act,that will not be forgotten and it will cost him a lot of votes.

Yeah, we couldn't restore property rights by eliminating Title II and Title VII of the civil rights act. That would be bad. Gosh, we might just be on the path to protecting the rights of people. We can't have that.
 
Can someone explain to me why he was ticked off a democrat didn't support him? That would be like Obama blocking all interstate highways in ohio because John Boner didn't endorse him. Of course he didn't he is a republican.
 




It's not going to happen.

Wait and see.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…