• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Harris Campaign's New Ad About JD Vance Being A Heartbeat Away From The Presidency. (1 Viewer)

 
Walz was right, there is NO FIREWALL in that house! Not Vance, not that QAnon house speaker, zero, zip, nada! That's pretty scary! Thank goodness we had Pence last time to stop the steal!
 
CaughtInThe said:
Click to expand...

That vance sneers at professionals shouldn't come as a surprise.

Experience, even expertise, count for nothing when it comes to those who criticize or don't agree with a GOP policy.
 
Pyrite said:
That vance sneers at professionals shouldn't come as a surprise.

Experience, even expertise, count for nothing when it comes to those who criticize or don't agree with a GOP policy.
Click to expand...
Yep

MAGA reads Facebook

MAGA shares Facebook posts

MAGA smarter than everyone else

And the election was stolen too didn't you know?
 
Ginger Ale said:
Walz was right, there is NO FIREWALL in that house! Not Vance, not that QAnon house speaker, zero, zip, nada! That's pretty scary! Thank goodness we had Pence last time to stop the steal!
Click to expand...
..."He lost the election. This is not a debate. It's not anything anywhere other than in Donald Trump's world, because, look, when Mike Pence made that decision to certify that election, that's why Mike Pence isn't on this stage."

"What I'm concerned about is where is the firewall with Donald Trump? Where is the firewall if he knows he could do anything, including taking an election and his Vice President's not going to stand to it. That's what we're asking you, America. Will you stand up? Will you keep your oath of office even if the President doesn't?"...
 
Pyrite said:
..."He lost the election. This is not a debate. It's not anything anywhere other than in Donald Trump's world, because, look, when Mike Pence made that decision to certify that election, that's why Mike Pence isn't on this stage."

"What I'm concerned about is where is the firewall with Donald Trump? Where is the firewall if he knows he could do anything, including taking an election and his Vice President's not going to stand to it. That's what we're asking you, America. Will you stand up? Will you keep your oath of office even if the President doesn't?"...
Click to expand...
abcnews.go.com

JD Vance says he's wouldn't have certified 2020 race until states submitted pro-Trump electors

Sen. JD Vance on Sunday defended Trump as the former president faces a litany of legal issues amid his comeback campaign for the White House
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

February 4, 2024

...In a contentious interview with ABC News "This Week" anchor George Stephanopoulos, Vance -- a onetime Trump critic -- also doubled down on his views of the 2020 election, saying the results shouldn't have been immediately certified...

Vance, an Ohio Republican who has been floated in the media as a potential running mate for Trump, was asked by Stephanopoulos if he would have certified the 2020 election results as vice president, as required by the Constitution and as then-Vice President Mike Pence did.

Vance called it a "ridiculous question" and claimed Stephanopoulos was "obsessed with talking about this" but went on to say he would have liked to see the certification of the 2020 election handled differently....

"If I had been vice president, I would have told the states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia and so many others, that we needed to have multiple slates of electors and I think the U.S. Congress should have fought over it from there," he continued. "That is the legitimate way to deal with an election that a lot of folks, including me, think had a lot of problems in 2020. I think that's what we should have done."

The Constitution makes no such provisions for this. There has been no confirmed evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 race, and the results were affirmed by local officials across the country, including many Republicans....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom