- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
- Messages
- 19,124
- Reaction score
- 16,643
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Granting her immunity or a pardon would make it easier for prosecutors or Congress to question her since the 5th amendment would no longer apply.
You mean it will be easier to cut a deal with her so she keeps Trump's name out of everything.Granting her immunity or a pardon would make it easier for prosecutors or Congress to question her since the 5th amendment would no longer apply.
Maybe she doesn’t if you believe all of the people who have committed crimes that she was involved in have all been identified and prosecuted.Why does she need to be questioned at all?
No, that’s clearly not what I said.You mean it will be easier to cut a deal with her so she keeps Trump's name out of everything.
Which is why I framed it as a translation. You're welcome.No, that’s clearly not what I said.
The left simply wants the issue. If they were looking for answers with regard to Epstein, they had 12 years and two administrations to do that. Given the questions surrounding Russian collusion and the apparent effort to construct it, mining Epstein would’ve been far easier to undo Trump. After all, the left seems to be without leadership or issues at present. They just have plenty of mouth, which is not new.Granting her immunity or a pardon would make it easier for prosecutors or Congress to question her since the 5th amendment would no longer apply.
IT was not the left pointing that list in every direction insisting so and so was on it and Sheriff Trump, Child Protector Elite, was coming to town to bring justice. It turned out he's on the list, so his admin started yelling "Obama' at the base, and the base responded. If you think the country doesn't see the 800th iteration of OBAMA BLACK GUY BAD, I got another wall to sell you.The left simply wants the issue. If they were looking for answers with regard to Epstein, they had 12 years and two administrations to do that. Given the questions surrounding Russian collusion and the apparent effort to construct it, mining Epstein would’ve been far easier to undo Trump. After all, the left seems to be without leadership or issues at present. They just have plenty of mouth, which is not new.
You're projecting. If the left acted like the right, all of the Russian collusion stuff would have come out right before the 2016 election.The left simply wants the issue. If they were looking for answers with regard to Epstein, they had 12 years and two administrations to do that. Given the questions surrounding Russian collusion and the apparent effort to construct it, mining Epstein would’ve been far easier to undo Trump. After all, the left seems to be without leadership or issues at present. They just have plenty of mouth, which is not new.
When you can manage to respond to my post, let me know.IT was not the left pointing that list in every direction insisting so and so was on it and Sheriff Trump, Child Protector Elite, was coming to town to bring justice. It turned out he's on the list, so his admin started yelling "Obama' at the base, and the base responded. If you think the country doesn't see the 800th iteration of OBAMA BLACK GUY BAD, I got another wall to sell you.
You were wrong, but you should be used to that by now.Which is why I framed it as a translation. You're welcome.
Granting her immunity or a pardon would make it easier for prosecutors or Congress to question her since the 5th amendment would no longer apply.
If all you’re looking for is a way to shame Trump, that might work, unless his inclusion in the files is benign and doesn’t implicate him in any crimes. The only way to get other convictions will require her testimony, so if justice really is the goal then additional prosecutions will be needed. This is assuming she has information that would be damaging at trial and could help gain convictions.That's not justice, though. The victims' families deserve justice. I mean, who cares about her congressional testimony, really? Just release the files without Trump's name being redacted. We don't need her testimony. It seems Trump's more interested in her testimony, presumably believing that they can coerce her into saying whatever it is they want her to say.
Nope. The Epstein stuff has been around since 2008. The left assumed Clinton would win in 2016, and up until the last few months before the election, that was a safe assumption. The Russian collusion schtick was only cooked up after Hillary’s e-mail fiasco became public. Some of the documentation of that is now public.You're projecting. If the left acted like the right, all of the Russian collusion stuff would have come out right before the 2016 election.
Sure, it was cooked up that like 3 members of Trump's campaign team were prosecuted for their collusion with Russia. It was cooked up that Trump Jr showed up to a hotel when promised by Russians they could provide dirt on Hillary. It was cooked up that Roger Stone was going to work with prosecutors for his involvement with Russia, until Trump dangled a pardon his way and he stopped complying. I could fill a thread with all of the stuff found that were extremely concerning but you'd put your fingers into your ears and just ignore it now, like you did then.Nope. The Epstein stuff has been around since 2008. The left assumed Clinton would win in 2016, and up until the last few months before the election, that was a safe assumption. The Russian collusion schtick was only cooked up after Hillary’s e-mail fiasco became public. Some of the documentation of that is now public.
If all you’re looking for is a way to shame Trump, that might work, unless his inclusion in the files is benign and doesn’t implicate him in any crimes. The only way to get other convictions will require her testimony,
so if justice really is the goal then additional prosecutions will be needed.
How's that rigged jobs report looking?You were wrong, but you should be used to that by now.
How’s that bear market looking?
Jesus, I wish you people would stop with the retarded notion that someone you disagree with is a Trump supporter. I’ve never voted for the man.And that kind of testimony would be in a courtroom of criminal law, not before Congress.
Look, the whole reason we're even talking about the Epstein files is because the surrogates of the guy you voted for wouldn't shut the **** up about them during the campaign and promised to reveal 'the truth' about them once they came to office.
The whole sordid issue was politicized in an attempt to suggest Democrats were the party of perverts. As it turns out, MAGA is the dog that chased the car and now that they finally caught up with the car, they're complaining about how bad the tires taste.
Correct, but additional convictions are unlikely at this point, and even if they wanted to pursue new prosecutions, they don't need Maxwell to testify before Congress. They have whatever evidence they need already. Convicts can still testify, sometimes in return for leniency. Pardoning Maxwell would be a massive miscarriage of justice. It's bad enough she's been moved into a lower security facility for reasons we can only speculate about.
The only one who stands to benefit from having Maxwell pardoned and then testifying before Congress is Trump and whoever else is implicated.
So now you think jobs reports are the same as a bear market? Weird. Keep digging, I’m sure there’s something good at the bottom of that hole you’re in.How's that rigged jobs report looking?
She's not going to testify against him. She is terrified of him. She has known for a very long time that he is very powerful, gets what he wants, and is not afraid of the law. He probably had Jeffery killed.Granting her immunity or a pardon would make it easier for prosecutors or Congress to question her since the 5th amendment would no longer apply.
Whataboutism alert!The left simply wants the issue. If they were looking for answers with regard to Epstein, they had 12 years and two administrations to do that. Given the questions surrounding Russian collusion and the apparent effort to construct it, mining Epstein would’ve been far easier to undo Trump. After all, the left seems to be without leadership or issues at present. They just have plenty of mouth, which is not new.
Why should anybody respond to a post that is intended as a threadjacking flame post.When you can manage to respond to my post, let me know.
Threadjacking.You were wrong, but you should be used to that by now.
How’s that bear market looking?
She does.If all you’re looking for is a way to shame Trump, that might work, unless his inclusion in the files is benign and doesn’t implicate him in any crimes. The only way to get other convictions will require her testimony, so if justice really is the goal then additional prosecutions will be needed. This is assuming she has information that would be damaging at trial and could help gain convictions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?