- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 31,089
- Reaction score
- 4,384
- Location
- The greatest city on Earth
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
His view on millitias told me all I needed to know. Associating them falsely with the right....
Already told you Black Panthers. You don't even realize you're mistake, sad.please name a left-wing oriented Militia in the USA.
thanks.
Already told you Black Panthers. You don't even realize you're mistake, sad.
They are militias, they drill as such. You want to admit your mistake or continue into failure? I don't care being you've lost this already, your choice.they were not a Militia.
their descendants, the New Black Panther Party, are Muslim Black-nationalist.
now, let's try again: please name a left-wing Militia in the USA.
thanks.
They are militias...
They meet regularly, train in tactics, organize, oh and have you forgotten about the weapons they brandished at the polling place in '08? They are a militia and you don't have a single chance at credibility if you continue this asinine tactic of trying to act like you think you've accomplished a "gotcha" moment. You've been nailed here and there really isn't much left to say except. Here are a few more, ELF, ALF, The Hutaree, Greenpeace, etc. And yes they are considered militias by standard definition. So quit trying to deflect, I've already shown you the definition of such and the true explanation, everyone has shown you aren't qualified to make further assessments here. Deal with it.by what cockamaimee, half-assed, bull**** definition of "Militia", do you consider the Black Panthers to have been a Militia?
:lamo
You have already admitted in this very thread that you view the Second Amendment as a pure good. You are so far out there on that extremist limb that you cannot even see any negative or bad that comes from it even when I admit that the good far outweighs that negative small part. That puts you in the hopelessly irrational category. There is simply no rational discussion with such an extremist.
by what cockamaimee, half-assed, bull**** definition of "Militia", do you consider the Black Panthers to have been a Militia?
:lamo
how can a right be anything but good? if someone misuses the right that does not tarnish it in the least because we know damn well that in areas where the second amendment does not exist, guns are obtained and used for ill. You are the extremist because you pretend you support the right which is a bald faced lie
Your flushed thread about calling innocent slain children "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most pathetic threads in terms of dishonesty and trolling I have ever seen on this board in almost 7 years
The term both of you are looking for is correct, there is no other term to use. Neither of you know the first thing about this subject and come at the debates with an anti-gun pamphlet view of the subject. That being said both of you are out of your league here and don't have the slightest chance against people who literally have a lifetime of experience with the subject, such as Goshin, TD, myself, and others. The first two having much more knowledge than myself.I strongly object to those views as being characterized as "half assed". In the spirit of FAST TIMES AS RIDGEMENT HIGH they are most certainly fully assed.
But that WAS NOT THE QUESTION YOU ANSWERED.
Well TD, you know that when their arguments got dusted, their insufficient knowledge exposed, and their asses handed to them all they have left are silly games.enough of the silly games. Rights are good. especially ones that are as fundamental as the second
The term both of you are looking for is correct, there is no other term to use. Neither of you know the first thing about this subject and come at the debates with an anti-gun pamphlet view of the subject. That being said both of you are out of your league here and don't have the slightest chance against people who literally have a lifetime of experience with the subject, such as Goshin, TD, myself, and others. The first two having much more knowledge than myself.
enough of the silly games. Rights are good. especially ones that are as fundamental as the second
agreed, the "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most idiotic things I ever have seen on this board compound by the claim that the originator was pro second amendment. Heck, even thunder napalmed that nonsenseWell TD, you know that when their arguments got dusted, their insufficient knowledge exposed, and their asses handed to them all they have left are silly games.
Your position is your position. If you wish to characterize it as a "silly game" that is on you and nobody else. If you are impotent to defend your own stated position - that is also on you and nobody else and is hardly a "silly game" that anyone is engaged in except yourself.
agreed, the "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most idiotic things I ever have seen on this board compound by the claim that the originator was pro second amendment. Heck, even thunder napalmed that nonsense
Impotent my ass, You are getting filleted like a carp on this subject. You pretend you are second amendment and not one poster-Left right or undetermined believed that fertilizer
A broken clock is right twice a day. Don't read too much into it. For a person who claims to be pro-2nd you sure don't demonstrate a very good grasp of it. If you don't want to be called out bring something better than the hackery I've seen. I don't care what you "think" about the subject, I care about what the more informed know.Please be a decent chap with enough intellectual and moral integrity - not to mention debating skills - to quote me as being anti-gun owner rights.
btw - Goshin agreed with me earlier today on the subject and I agreed with his post as well. Your list of allies grows thin.
You're right, there wasn't "one" thing you've said that was factually incorrect, it's the entire body of work.Not one person including you has found a single thing I said that was not factually correct nor any statement against fun rights or the Second Amendment. How is that filleting me like a carp?
A broken clock is right twice a day. Don't read too much into it. For a person who claims to be pro-2nd you sure don't demonstrate a very good grasp of it. If you don't want to be called out bring something better than the hackery I've seen. I don't care what you "think" about the subject, I care about what the more informed know.
Don't take things the wrong way. I've been skipping over your posts because I know you are wrong. I just don't feel like dealing with the headache of getting into the dance again. You are wrong.You have been utterly impotent to cite one single thing that I have been wrong about regarding the Second Amendment.
Are you now going to rise to the occasion? Or will you continue to engage is silly personal attacks because you wrongly perceive me as the enemy?
You were impotent then and are impotent now to find one factual thing wrong with any position I took in that thread. I never advocated any laws regarding guns, gun owners, gun rights or the Second Amendment.
Instead of engaging in ad hominem attacks upon me because of your own twisted and false perceptions of my opinions, why don't you have the intellectual integrity to use them in a quote and engage in honest debate?
Don't take things the wrong way. I've been skipping over your posts because I know you are wrong. I just don't feel like dealing with the headache of getting into the dance again. You are wrong.
This is amazing watching you continue to post YOU ARE WRONG but are utterly impotent to find one thing that I am factually wrong about. You claim to be such a expert on this topic of the Second Amendment. So go and tell me what I am factually wrong about.
But you have been proven impotent to do so and even now you admit you cannot do it because you do not even have the good sense nor intellectual integrtity to read what you claim you are passing judgment upon. That is a pretty sorry excuse for debate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?