And yet say nothing about an Islamist POS who says that the U.S. was a co-conspirator in 9-11 and that OBL was made in America 16 days after 9-11. Shows them for what they are, they can care less about the 1st amendment if it's not being used to promote an Islamist anti-American agenda.
I accepted the Hamas quote you hack. That has nothing to do with it.
The longest circulating newspaper in the country is a meaningless thing to say, says nothing about content.
You failed to prove that the groundbreaking ceremony was on 9/11 2011. Your sources were:
NYPOST (Tabloid)
Opinion Article By Rabbi
Opinion article by a Republican running for governor of New York State
Bias some?
Bull****, I had to get the video and audio because you refused to accept the NYPOST article with the direct quote and then your ran away.
lol I provided a source from the NYPost, the Huffington Post, and CNN.
The NYPost is unacceptable I guess because wikipedia labels them a tabloid, the Huffington Post was unacceptable I guess because Jews can't be trusted, and I guess CNN just publishes **** without factchecking. :roll:
If he says that, he's a retard.
But all this hoopla over the mosque plays right into their hands. First, there's nothing you can do about it.
We all know this to be true. Second, you are giving them **** tons of publicity. Boom, here's this mosque. Let's keep talking about, let's keep it in the news, let's advertise who the owner is and his beliefs so if anyone out there may feel the same they know. The only thing you can do by continually bitching about this is to help their cause. If everyone shrugged their shoulders, said "it's a free country", and went on their way; this would be done and over and no one would care about that jackoff's mosque.
And while OBL wasn't made in America, we did train his ass.
It has nothing to do with the dude being Jewish.
CNN's page: AN OPINION ARTICLE. Clearly states that all content on the page was the OPINION of the Author, and not of CNN.
NYPOST is a tabloid, whether Wikipedia says it or not. Or shall I illustrate my point:
Yep, hard hitting facts newspaper if I EVER saw one.
Didn't you know? Rape is now permissable for Muslims according to a judge in New Jersey, whereas, non-Muslims can be successfully sued for refusing to cater at same sex weddings based on their own assinine religious beliefs.
Then what does it have to do with? What's your point about him being a rabbi?
What is this picture (if even real) supposed to prove?
And other people have the right to call those protesters "retards".
Of particular interest are the views of leading Muslim moderates
...
“For us, a mosque was always a place to pray, to be together on holidays — not a way to make an ostentatious architectural statement,’’ Jasser said. “Ground zero shouldn’t be about promoting Islam. It’s the place where war was declared on us as Americans.’’ To use that space for Muslim outreach, he argues, is “the worst form of misjudgment.’’
...
Schwartz notes that the spiritual leader of the Cordoba Initiative, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, describes himself as a Sufi — a Muslim focused on Islamic mysticism and spiritual wisdom. But “building a 15-story Islamic center at ground zero isn’t something a Sufi would do,’’
...
Ali al-Ahmed, a Saudi native who founded the Institute for Gulf Affairs and is an advocate for civil rights and religious freedom in the Middle East, hopes for the best from Cordoba House. “A mosque should be a good thing,’’ he told me. But he worries about the number of Americans who may be “hurt and upset’’ by the project, and wonders whether a mosque is really the best thing for Muslims to build so close to ground zero.
A mosque at ground zero? - The Boston Globe
So people whom are against the building of this mosque so close to the Ground Zero site of 9/11 are 'retards' eh?....Let's see what some of the moderate muslims that are here have to say about it shall we?
Now that I have used what should be an acceptable source to all, with direct quotes of Muslim leaders right here that are in opposition to the Mosque site, are they 'retards'?
j-mac
Perhaps I shouldn't have put that down, but if it was an Imam talking about a Jewish institution without citing any source for a claim like this, would you feel the same? Doubt it.
Point is, opinion articles are NOT FACT.
Well if some muslims are bad, and to you taht makes all muslims bad. Then if this is the front page of a random NYPOST issue, then by your logic they're all equally as stupid.
NYPOST is a tabloid, regardless of how old it is.
If your claim was so true (which is isnt) how come you can't find a non-opinion article, main stream source to prove it. I looked, if it was true I'd want to know, and it would certainly change my opinion quite a bit. But I'm interested in facts, and this I'm afraid to say, is not one of them.
I think the whole lot of the jerks are.
I'm expecting free republic, tbh.
Jet.
That was a legitimate story. It happened a few months ago when her pet ape killed her friend.
Lesson Learned: Never read a book by its cover :3oops:
But still. NYPOST is a Tabloid.
Awww, its cute AND unbelievable...by that I am of course referencing your utter dishonesty by clipping what you actually quoted from "member 1". Now boys and girls, lets look at the whole sentence to illustrate Prof's pathetic dishonset spin, shall we?
Wow, so now that we actually post his WHOLE statement we see Prof's utter and blatant dishonesty, as we see that member 1 says to build whatever you want EXECPT AT GROUND ZERO. Thus my asking for clarification, since at one point he's saying "build whatever you want" while at the same time he's saying "Don't build at ground zero".
Notice as well, rather than continually just ASSUME I know what J-Mac's talking about (and furthermore completely stating something that he's specifically and repeatedly stated clearly that he's NOt saying) and commenting on it as if my view of what he said is fact I'm actually asking for clarification to better address what he's saying. Again, you show you're dishonesty in editing down what I said to give it a different meaning. The full statement:
Seriously prof, you're attempts at dishonesty are so pathetically weak that they're almost cute in their laughability.
These Muslim leaders are jerks?
j-mac
Damn, it's times like this that I am glad you are ripping on him instead of ripping on me. LOL.
Hey! Build whatever you want, Support what ever you want. I Never, NOT ONCE said that a Mosque shouldn't be built in America at all. Just not at Ground Zero. Don't you get it? If you think that for one moment that my argument is based in destroying rights, then I have a far different view than that which you subscribe to me.
So all of their quotes and facts are made up. Thats your position?
I used to think of Zyphlin as a remarkably level-headed poster. Not sure if he's having an off week or if I was simply mistaken.Damn, it's times like this that I am glad you are ripping on him instead of ripping on me. LOL.
I used to think of Zyphlin as a remarkably level-headed poster. Not sure if he's having an off week or if I was simply mistaken.
No. My position is that Agent Ferris frequently distorts and misrepresents actual occurrances. And, sure enough, that's what he did in this thread. Additionally, people like you and AF look for news outlets that support your paradigms and may play fast/loose with the facts. Remember Shirley Sherrod?
I used to think of Zyphlin as a remarkably level-headed poster. Not sure if he's having an off week or if I was simply mistaken.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?