Conservatives really should get their talking points straight. Not doing so makes the ideology look chaotic and unorganized. It also lends credence to the "Party of no" accusations.
Conservatives really should get their talking points straight. Not doing so makes the ideology look chaotic and unorganized. It also lends credence to the "Party of no" accusations.
Hey! Build whatever you want, Support what ever you want. I Never, NOT ONCE said that a Mosque shouldn't be built in America at all. Just not at Ground Zero. Don't you get it? If you think that for one moment that my argument is based in destroying rights, then I have a far different view than that which you subscribe to me.
It is odd to me why no one is bothering to answer a question I posed earlier in this thread which is, why is it so damned important to rush this building through the process, without concrete answers, and demonization of opposition to it, while St. Nicholas Church, a Greek Orthodox church, that already existed, and was damaged by the events of 9/11 is being stonewalled on its own rebuilding?
Only among liberals doing their level best to cover for this inept joke of a President.
j-mac
member 1---hey, build whatever you want
member 2---there's a difference between saying it SHOULDN'T be built and saying it's PROHIBITED, it seems to me you're arguing the latter...
unbelievable
'Member One' said:Hey! Build whatever you want, Support what ever you want. I Never, NOT ONCE said that a Mosque shouldn't be built in America at all. Just not at Ground Zero. Don't you get it? If you think that for one moment that my argument is based in destroying rights, then I have a far different view than that which you subscribe to me.
'Member Two' said:There's a difference between saying it SHOULDN'T be built and saying it's PROHIBITED, it seems to me you're arguing the latter. If I'm incorrect and you're suggesting the first, then my apologizes.
Second, if your argument IS the latter then yes, your argument IS about destroying rights.
If Islamists do these things, they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Hey! Build whatever you want, Support what ever you want. I Never, NOT ONCE said that a Mosque shouldn't be built in America at all. Just not at Ground Zero. Don't you get it? If you think that for one moment that my argument is based in destroying rights, then I have a far different view than that which you subscribe to me.
Didn't you know? Rape is now permissable for Muslims according to a judge in New Jersey, whereas, non-Muslims can be successfully sued for refusing to cater at same sex weddings based on their own assinine religious beliefs.
Do you have evidence of these claims?
And how does this mosque comes into conflict with the law?
Didn't you know? Rape is now permissable for Muslims according to a judge in New Jersey, whereas, non-Muslims can be successfully sued for refusing to cater at same sex weddings based on their own assinine religious beliefs.
No, I mean the definition of the word in question...
Nice troll attempt though.
I'm expecting free republic, tbh.Wait for what he does bring up:
Opinion articles
NYPOST
Jihadwatch
And is it not possible that those things are wrong AND trying to legislatively stop someone from building a mosque near ground zero is ALSO wrong?
Islam is wrong. Period, end of statement.
They have the right to build their little shrine to oppression and we have the right to protest their shrine to oppression.
Islam is wrong. Period, end of statement.
They have the right to build their little shrine to oppression and we have the right to protest their shrine to oppression.
Islam is wrong. Period, end of statement.
They have the right to build their little shrine to oppression and we have the right to protest their shrine to oppression.
Islam is wrong. Period, end of statement.
They have the right to build their little shrine to oppression and we have the right to protest their shrine to oppression.
Wait for what he does bring up:
Opinion articles
NYPOST
Jihadwatch
Try direct ****ing quotes pal to which you have no reply whatsoever. I already bashed your ass with the ****ing direct quotes from the Islamist POS sponsoring this monstrosity? I posted the direct transcript from 60 minutes, but then you refused to accept the Hamas quote from the longest circulating newspaper in the country so I posted the ****ing video and audio of the man saying it.
This is you:
Deny, ad-hom, deny, ad-hom, deny, ad-hom (oops primary source material can't deny or ad-hom) run away. Now run away.
And other people have the right to call those protesters "retards".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?