- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Messages
- 30,545
- Reaction score
- 14,776
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
No. I got it in one. I provided "any economic number that is better today than the Bush averages including the recession."Want to try again?
No. I got it in one. I provided "any economic number that is better today than the Bush averages including the recession."
imho, we should get back to talking about Perry's problems.
That is the problem with people like you, you really don't understand the economy just like you don't understand the Perry situation. Rhetoric is all you are good at, substance, not so much.
Perry has no problems, liberals do
Awww. Diddums.
lol
; )
If Perry can win the Republican nomination you are free to vote for him. I believe you and I both know this isn't going to happen. Perhaps before these indictments there was a small percentage of a chance he could have competed. Now his chances are pretty much zilch.
In my mind bush and obama blur together, at least on economic policy.
Vicariously Vicious
You get a feeling of absolute power yourself if you support this unlimited veto power. Those who claim to be anti-statist always give themselves away. They want a totalitarian private sector and a government that protects it through absolute contempt for the will of the majority.
On the contrary. I foresee significant backlash against the democrats for this stunt. Perry may or may not win the nomination but i think it will be because there are better overall candidates. Nit because of partisan loonys in austin
The veto itself is a check on legislative power, in turn checked by the power to override that power. Separation of powers/checks and balances, I think people get surprised when they learn that the executive branch is actually vested with powers.
Actually, in Texas, nobody trusted politicians when they wrote their state Constitution. So the Governorship is relatively weak, and the Congress meets only every other year. Most of the power in Texas is in the hands of the various commissions.
The indictment of Perry won't stand because...
As to Count I
On or about June 14, 2013, in the County of Travis, Texas, James Richard "Rick" Perry, with intent to harm another, to-wit, Rosemary Lehmberg and the Public Integrity Unit of the Travis County District Attorney's Office, intentionally or knowingly misused government property by dealing with such property contrary to an agreement under which defendant held such property or contrary to the oath of office he took as a public servant, such government property being monies having a value of in excess of $200,000 which were approved and authorized by the Legislature of the State of Texas to fund the continued operation of the Public Integrity Unit of the Travis County District Attorney's Office, and which had come into defendant's custody or possession by virtue of the defendant's office as a public servant, namely, Governor of the State of Texas.
The State of Texas v. James Richard "Rick" Perry
http://dig.abclocal.go.com/ktrk/PICS/AUGUST14/Perryindictment.pdf
Perry did not perform acts which comport to the specifics contained in the law.
To wit
Before the governor signs legislation, it is not a law.
Any legislation which provided monies for the continued operation of the Public Integrity Unit is not a law until it is signed off on by the governor.
This legislation was never signed by the governor.
Therefore the legislation never became law.
Funding, monies, contained in bills are not real. Funding does not come into being until the legislation becomes a law.
This legislation never became a law.
Therefore the monies never actually existed.
It is impossible to misuse property which does not exist.
Therefore, not only is there reasonable doubt that Perry is guilty of this charge, it is literally impossible for him to be guilty of this charge.
Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prosecutors' funds
All I can say is HOLY CRAP. This is going to be a political crapstorm.
Article is here.
Even Democrats are calling this nonsense....
This was nothing more than an attempt by the FAR LEFT to take the heat off of Leirner and Obamy****s golfing...
So far as I understand indictments, they only mean "there's enough evidence here of something being wrong that we recommend further investigation/legal proceedings to determine whether something bad actually went down."First Texas governor indicted in almost 100 years. Rick Perry is an embarrassment.
So far as I understand indictments, they only mean "there's enough evidence here of something being wrong that we recommend further investigation/legal proceedings to determine whether something bad actually went down."
That's it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?