Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
For the love of...he wasn't killed. Stop with the hysterics.
Why was he fired?
Folks, please try to remember that, like it or not, the PRESIDENT sets foreign policy. Then it is up to the State Department and any other Agencies of the Executive Branch to act in support of his policies.
Who knows?
IMO it should be anyone who continues to try to buck the President's foreign policy decisions rather than provide wholehearted support of same.
Folks, please try to remember that, like it or not, the PRESIDENT sets foreign policy. Then it is up to the State Department and any other Agencies of the Executive Branch to act in support of his policies.
Not for individuals who don't agree to undermine and/or try to sink them.
DJT ought to be firing ALL the Swamp creatures.
Stupid comment, since Sondland did not "buck" the President's foreign policy.IMO it should be anyone who continues to try to buck the President's foreign policy decisions rather than provide wholehearted support of same.
This is a lie, on multiple fronts.Folks, please try to remember that, like it or not, the PRESIDENT sets foreign policy.
Then who would visit Mar-a-Lago?DJT ought to be firing ALL the Swamp creatures.
DJT ought to be firing ALL the Swamp creatures.
It's amusing to see this idiocy repeated time and time again... CONGRESS also has a say in foreign policy, the idea that foreign policy is the sole province of the president is not only wrong but stupid as well..
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
NO. The House has NO Constitutional foreign affairs powers.
The Senate has the power to approve treaties, and ambassadorial appointments.
The President has the power to handle foreign affairs.
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
If it was his official policy, why did he run it through backchannels (later denying he knew what they were up to) and conceal it from his normal foreign affairs teams?
If it was just a matter of a legitimate foreign policy dispute, why did he work so hard to hide information?
Rationalize it however you like but your framing is incomplete, at best.
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
"Official" policy? :doh
If the President says "This is what we are going to do, and how I expect it to be done," then that is ALL needs be said. If it involves special instructions, etc., then they will be provided as needed in due course.
As for "hiding information?" Lots of things done at the Executive (and other) levels are automatically "confidential" or higher security classification unless the President declassifies them...like those telephone conversations.
When and if YOU ever have a need to know? Then the information will also be published in due course. :coffeepap:
Gordon Sondland has been fired from his ambassadorship to the EU. Who's next?
Testified against Trump.
(It's kind of funny, of course. At the time, the story was that nothing he said showed wrongdoing on Trump's part. Are the people who said that going to address how that is inconsistent with Trump taking revenge?
Why, of course not).