(CNN)Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska broke with many of her Republican colleagues Thursday, applauding an op-ed by General James Mattis that condemned President Donald Trump's actions this week.
"When I saw General Mattis' comments yesterday I felt like perhaps we are getting to a point where we can be more honest with the concerns that we might hold internally and have the courage of our own convictions to speak up," Murkowksi said on Capitol Hill.
The comments were a stark contrast to many of her other Republican colleagues on Capitol Hill who argued that while Mattis had a right to disagree with Trump, they didn't agree with Mattis' assessment.
"I was really thankful. I thought General Mattis' words were true, and honest and necessary and overdue," Murkowski said. "And, I have been struggling for the right words, and I was encouraged a couple of nights ago when I was able to read what President Bush had written. And I found that to be empowering for me as one leader."
Murkowski, a Republican who has demonstrated an independent voting streak in the Senate, told reporters Thursday that she was still "struggling" with a decision about whether she would support Trump in November.
"I am struggling with it. I have struggled with it for a long time I think you know that. I didn't support the President in the initial election, and I work hard to try to make sure that I'm able to represent my state well that I'm able to work with any administration and any president," Murkowski said. "He is our duly elected President I will continue to work with him. I will continue to work with this administration but I think right now as we are all struggling to find ways to express the words that need to be expressed appropriately, questions about who I'm going to vote for not going to vote for I think are distracting at the moment."
Good on Senator Murkowski.
Let others come forward.
What other choice does she have? The RNC didn't let anyone else run.
If she goes democrat, that will be political suicide for her and when have you ever know a republican to put the nation before the party?
She could vote third party, or stay home:mrgreen:
But yes, I agree with your points.
A third party vote is almost the same as voting for Trump, IMO.
Third party votes definitely benefitted Trump in 2016.
But this year, at least based on polling now, there are much less "undecided" voters this time around. Trump benefitted immensely from those "undecided" voters in 2016.
At this point, any Republican official that say's they are “struggling” can kiss my ass. She’s a damned coward. Like Collins with her “well, I think the president has learned a lesson now” bull****. Pick a position and own it. Look at Graham, one of Trump’s most vociferous critics before the election, but since then he’s swallowed Trump whole. He publicly and unabashedly declares his love for his very good friend. Of course, just about everyone has lost all respect for Lyndsey, but he doesn’t care because Trump will always have his back.Lisa Murkowski: GOP senator says she's 'struggling' on whether to back Trump - CNNPolitics
Thoughts? Anyone buy it? I say that her, like damn nearly all of her fellow Republicans, will vote for the orange menace in November, despite claiming "concern" or that they are "struggling" about it. In 2016 many of them claimed the same thing, but when the election rolled around the so called "Never Trump" movement ended up being a total farce. It will be no different this time around.
At this point, any Republican official that say's they are “struggling” can kiss my ass. She’s a damned coward. Like Collins with her “well, I think the president has learned a lesson now” bull****. Pick a position and own it. Look at Graham, one of Trump’s most vociferous critics before the election, but since then he’s swallowed Trump whole. He publicly and unabashedly declares his love for his very good friend. Of course, just about everyone has lost all respect for Lyndsey, but he doesn’t care because Trump will always have his back.
Trump also benefitted from the Berner's who were pissed at the DNC for not getting behind their boy and voted for Trump in protest. And the EC. Can't forget the EC. That's the only way a republican can get elected president these days.
As long as he’s officially “straight”, he’s good to go with the GOP.I'm surprised that Graham, being as queer as a three dollar bill, gets the conservative support he does. That's progress I suppose.
At this point, any Republican official that say's they are “struggling” can kiss my ass. She’s a damned coward. Like Collins with her “well, I think the president has learned a lesson now” bull****. Pick a position and own it. Look at Graham, one of Trump’s most vociferous critics before the election, but since then he’s swallowed Trump whole. He publicly and unabashedly declares his love for his very good friend. Of course, just about everyone has lost all respect for Lyndsey, but he doesn’t care because Trump will always have his back.
I was being facetious.I liked this post, but I disagree that Trump will always have Graham's back. Trump will throw anyone, and I mean anyone, under the bus if it were to save his own ass. Trump is nobodies friend.
And Graham is just a GOP toady, hence his support for Trump. Once Trump is gone from office, he will have no more use for that bombastic idiot.
As long as he’s officially “straight”, he’s good to go with the GOP.
Good on Senator Murkowski.
Let others come forward.
Lisa Murkowski: GOP senator says she's 'struggling' on whether to back Trump - CNNPolitics
Thoughts? Anyone buy it? I say that her, like damn nearly all of her fellow Republicans, will vote for the orange menace in November, despite claiming "concern" or that they are "struggling" about it. In 2016 many of them claimed the same thing, but when the election rolled around the so called "Never Trump" movement ended up being a total farce. It will be no different this time around.
Will is a man of real character. The Republican Party is much worse off without folks like him.A political party’s primary function is to bestow its imprimatur on candidates, thereby proclaiming: This is who we are. In 2016, the Republican Party gave its principal nomination to a vulgarian and then toiled to elect him. And to stock Congress with invertebrates whose unswerving abjectness has enabled his institutional vandalism, who have voiced no serious objections to his Niagara of lies, and whom T.S. Eliot anticipated:
We are the hollow men . . .
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
or rats’ feet over broken glass . . .
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...80ecf4-a425-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html
George Will is a conservative who's been around forever.
He says Trump has got to go for the good of the country. He say we should kick out all the republican senators and republican congressmen while we're at it, as punishment for them backing Trump.
George Will is a great American.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?