- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 12,029
- Reaction score
- 3,530
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Q: And, sir, are you familiar with the National Treasury Employees Union?
A: Yes.
Q: Are you a member of the union?
A: No, I am not.
Q: And __________, are you registered to vote?
A: Yes, I am.
Q: And do you have a party affiliation?
A: Yes, I do.
Q: What's your party affiliation?
Another Dupe; guess this must be important to the radical left and how come they forget about the new connection to the DC supervisors?
Denial. It's the only strategy conservatives have left on this IRS investigation fiasco. I guess Issa didn't count on the Democrats ferreting out his operative behind the whole fake scandal.
Denial would be ignoring that person had a boss who gave ofailure a $4k donation and signed off on his blatant bias against the presidents political opponents. This is all well documented in the other thread but I guess you just need to start a new thread since that one got all doctored up wtih the TRUTH.
Read the transcript. Report back in.
Meantime, shouldn't Issa be investigated to see if he had contacts with this GOP operative?
Who's your transcripted Republican's boss? Why don't you care? Because you like that your dictator used his IRS to abuse his opposition don't you?
Sucker.
Looks like the tea party is just that. And now it's out. The guy behind the entire operation was a conservative republican.
It's perfect.
We finally learn that the man behind the IRS "scandal" of targeting Tea Party applications for nonprofit status is a self-described conservative Republican.
He admitted under oath, in a deposition, that he was in full charge of the operation and that he is a Republican.
We now need to investigate what contacts the man had with Issa and the other GOP leaders who cooked up this fake scandal. Apparently this falls under Nixonian "dirty tricks" operations.
Predictable.
From the transcript, made under penalty of perjury:
Get the transcript here:
http://democrats.oversight.house.gov/images/stories/IRS_Screening_Manager_Part_I.pdf
I hope all the tea partiers on this board join me in calling for an investigation of this man and his links with GOP leadership.
So just because he's "anything but a Democrat" means the entire scandal is completely made up? The journalists spied on was made up? The NSA admitting to wiretapping and spying? The drones? All that is totally fake, because the guy isn't a Democrat.
Like I said....sucker.
We finally learn that the man behind the IRS "scandal" of targeting Tea Party applications for nonprofit status is a self-described conservative Republican.
He admitted under oath, in a deposition, that he was in full charge of the operation and that he is a Republican.
We now need to investigate what contacts the man had with Issa and the other GOP leaders who cooked up this fake scandal. Apparently this falls under Nixonian "dirty tricks" operations.
Predictable.
From the transcript, made under penalty of perjury:
Get the transcript here:
http://democrats.oversight.house.gov/images/stories/IRS_Screening_Manager_Part_I.pdf
I hope all the tea partiers on this board join me in calling for an investigation of this man and his links with GOP leadership.
Uhhhh, what?
So just because he's "anything but a Democrat" means the entire scandal is completely made up? The journalists spied on was made up? The NSA admitting to wiretapping and spying? The drones? All that is totally fake, because the guy isn't a Democrat.
Like I said....sucker.
Uhh...which way did he go...which way did he go...my head is so far into the sand I can't see where he went....DUH
I'm 1000% convinced you haven't read this thing.
Directly from page 85 of this interview:
Q whose decision was it to hold cases in your group?
A By previous email, it was (redacted).
Q And did you have a reason, an understanding of the reason at this time that the cases were being held in your group?
A I wasn't given a reason. I was told to hold them in my group.
Read the interview buddy. This guy was following orders, and not asking questions. The freakin guy admits he doesn't even know what a sensitive case report is or who's responsible for creating them. Higher ups give his group criteria for flagging cases, and they follow orders like good little boys and girls.
Read your own links dude. Now you look stupid.
LOL Only you and Campbell who also posted this would truly BELIEVE a "conservative Republican" started profiling conservative groups for their beliefs. YYYYYYYYYYYYEP makes sense to me!!
Btw, the low information politician who started this knucklehead idea has retracted his statement. Cummings will never be confused with "an intelligent human".
BWHAHHAHAHHAH!
I guess you didn't read it.
Q: Do you think anybody higher up in the IRS was targeting conservative groups?
A: No, that's just not the way it works.
Kind of messes with your narrative, doesn't it?
Actually, I was thinking about another totally brainless douchebag, but that's ok.
This is hardly a closed case
It's worse than that for conservatives -- the trail is now leading back to the GOP leadership.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?