• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Good information about trump trying to deport hundreds of children to Guatemala

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
58,986
Reaction score
30,065
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Heather Cox Richardson:

 
And before anyone says: but ILLEGALS. These children are in the asylum application process. This makes their status legal. You ALWAYS have the right to apply for asylum, you just don't have an automatic right to have your application approved. But as long as the application is in process you are legally in the country you apply to.
 
Heather Cox Richardson:

There's one piece of "good information" that is missing (deliberately?) from that article: Exactly who was waiting in Guatemala for those children?

The article mentions those children being sent back to their own country "alone to their country of origin, Guatemala". Yes, they were sent alone, because someone sent them alone to the US. But are those children actually "alone"? Are there no adults with them on the planes? The article mentions those children have been "held according to law until they can be released to a relative or a guardian living in the U.S." but doesn't talk about whether any of those children even HAVE relatives or a guardian available in the US. The article mentions those children were being put on flights to Guatemala "where they may face abuse, neglect, persecution, or even torture". It appears the court didn't attempt to establish whether those children actually faced any such conditions before issuing its ruling.

What the article doesn't address is whether the parents of those children were waiting in Guatemala for their return...only to find out that bleeding hearts in the US prevented the scheduled arrival of children who have been alone in the US for months, or maybe even years. The article says the court tried to contact someone from the government but doesn't mention whether the court actually called the government officials who were at the airport with the children. I think that would be the FIRST people to call. Not some office in DC. And what the article doesn't address is what happened later, when the court conducted their hearing. Did the court even HAVE that hearing at all? What was the result of the hearing...if it did happen? Could it be those children HAVE already been through the process and the government was taking the next step...returning them to their families?

And finally, the article makes a big deal about "Sunday" and "Labor Day". What does that have to do with it? Guatemala doesn't have Labor Day and any parents and relatives in that country waiting for the return of their children probably don't give a rat's ass if it's a Sunday when their kids are returned.

Lots of spin and nonsense in that article and a lot of (deliberately?) missing information. Heather Cox Richardson should be ashamed of herself.
 
Back
Top Bottom