• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

God Exists [W:114]

No one can prove God exists. That's why they call it faith. But it is a possibility that God does exist. Science can't prove God doesn't exist. Actually, the belief in God and the belief in science are quite similar. Several philosophers discuss this very phenomenon; science is often expressed in religious terms. Miracle cures, magic bullets, etc. And the most fundamental theories of science are based on such sketchy evidence that they require a leap of faith to be plausible. Religion promises a heaven after you die; science says, why wait, we can create a heaven right here on earth if we can just figure out this technology thing. The problem with technology is the law of unintended consequences; technology solves one problem but creates even more, so apply even more technology, only to see the problems geometrically expanding.

Science has not been successful at all in answering mankind's fundamental questions because they are primarily spiritual; where did I come from? Why am I here? What is the purpose of life? What happens after I die?

There is room for religion and science in this world. They address different questions. Science is good for showing us how things work. But it has no answers to those spiritual questions. That's where GOD comes in.
 
I already know that you don't know God. I hope you do some day.

No one 'knows' god, yours or anyone elses'. A willful delusion. People are able to believe anything if they really want to.
 

Religion and science are not in the least similar. Religion is based on faith and science on evidence. A scientific statement is one that can in principle be disproved; science progresses by the continued testing of existing hypotheses. In stark contrast religion deals in claims which cannot, in principle, be tested. At various times and places even a suggestion that religious statements might be questioned might result in a speedy execution.
 

"but I guarantee you". You are in no position to "guarantee" anything to anyone. While you are welcome to believe anything you wish I suggest you refrain from arrogance.
 

Ummm....

Starts by not understanding what atheists are.

Then wanders around with a classic God of the gaps, goes into pillgrimage and then relavation.

I have been exposed to many liars in my time. This sounds like them. It might not be but it sounds just too classically from the christian play book of how they want the world to be to be real.

oops, just noticed it was from the religious section, I am not allowed to post in here as it upsets too many people.
 
Last edited:
No one 'knows' god, yours or anyone elses'. A willful delusion. People are able to believe anything if they really want to.
Yes, indeed, almost anything. For instance, that "No one 'knows' God." Even secret things like that, which would normally require some sort of psychic powers -- people are able to believe even that if the really want to, yes.
 
Isn't boid New York? Spring is sprung, the grass is riz, I wonder where da boidies iz?... So Goid would be from there?
From B'klyn, yes. I saw him once on the D train. Taller than I'd imagined.
 
I do not expect some to agree with me. The One that counts does.

It's not a matter of whether or not I agree with you. It's a matter of what does and does not constitute proof. If these events have solidified to you that God exists, then thats great for you. However, to claim with definite certainty that God exists outside of your personal certainty takes a higher standard of proof than you have offered here. It has nothing to do with how I personally feel about what you said.
 
Isn’t Goid just how you say Gord in Boston?
From the archives of colloquial wisdoms:

The spring is sprung,
the grass is ris'
I wonder where the boidies is.

I think the boidy's on the wing.

Don't be absoid, the wing is surely on the boid.

 
Isn't boid New York? Spring is sprung, the grass is riz, I wonder where da boidies iz?... So Goid would be from there?
Ooops, you beat me to it.

Nevertheless I supplied the logical conclusion, normally a rarity in these here parts.:mrgreen:
 
"Oh damn" said God "I didn't think of that." and poof! He disappeared in a puff of logic.
-Iforgetwho-

That was Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy. "That was easy, said the man, and immediately proved that black is white, and got killed at the next zebra crossing'.
 

While those numbers may be accurate, how anyone chooses to interpret them is variable.

If 32.5% of the world is Christian, 67.5% is not, meaning 67.5% of humans do not view Christianity as the truth, hence, Christians are in a minority there. Same with Islam and other religions. But, atheists fit right in with those who disbelieve the truth of a different religion. All of them are joined by one common denominator -- the disbelief that the other religion is the truth.

So, your numbers are probably right, but they certainly don't support the idea that anyone religion is correct. Rather, they disprove it.
 

For 'Proofs' of god, those arguments are horribly bad. They each have logical fallacies so large you could drive a mack truck through them.. The first one is the typical 'argument from personal incredulity', and the other two are 'personal testimony that can not be distinguished from confirmation bias... and 'argument from personal belief.' This is also the 'correlation does not equal causation'. They might have significance for your personal spiritual journey, but as logical arguments and evidence, they are just bad arguments.
 

Where did I say that the numbers prove that one religion is correct? Next time, take your cult glasses off and read what I write, not what your prejudiced mind thinks.
 

To have a member of the Atheist Cult tell me that the logic is horrible is proof that the argument is correct. Thanks for acknowledging that.
 
Where did I say that the numbers prove that one religion is correct? Next time, take your cult glasses off and read what I write, not what your prejudiced mind thinks.

Someone's wearing their cult glasses but it isn't me. Your exact words were:


So, I put the question back to you -- if 67.5 % of all people in the world do not believe in the Christian God, why does that not give you pause and cause you to ask why you belong in a minority that does?
 
To have a member of the Atheist Cult tell me that the logic is horrible is proof that the argument is correct. Thanks for acknowledging that.
You might actually want to take the time to educate yourself upon what a cult actually is.

Where controversy over the valid application of that term to any group persists, there's general agreement a cult need be a social group defined by its religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or its common interest in a particular personality, object or goal.

Seeing how atheists are not organized in any manner of a social group, neither the definitions nor the interests underlined above can apply.

Beyond which it would appear that you should also educate yourself upon the concepts of logic.

The way you attempt to apply it in the manner shown above, others might just as well say that any argument coming from a member of a religious group is thus by that nature at fault already.

And they'd be as devoid of logic as you have shown yourself to be and, consequently, just as wrong.
 
Where did I say that the numbers prove that one religion is correct? Next time, take your cult glasses off and read what I write, not what your prejudiced mind thinks.

Howard, you and your fellow cult members need to learn how to read. Secondly, not only did I not say one religion, I further said this: "Certainly numbers do not guarantee correctness" The comment was about the Atheist Cult's insignificance in the world. Why don't you go back to your Atheist Cult Forum and play there. Why try to ruin all of DP?
 

That was one of the definitions. Here is another: "4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc."

You guys continue to prove that your boasting of being the brightest bulbs on the tree is a false claim. You continue to prove your bulbs have burned out.
 
Where did I say that the numbers prove that one religion is correct? Next time, take your cult glasses off and read what I write, not what your prejudiced mind thinks.

If 50 million people say something foolish, it's still foolish. W Somerset Maugham
 
Your belief that God exists doesn't prove anything.

Your personal experiences are just that, and nothing more.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…