• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Global Warming is Here!!!

MrVicchio said:
Se ehow that works, his committee just TRASHES you and everything you push on here, the best you can do is attack him, not the work he compiles.
Click to expand...

A really partisan report from a really biased senator and his committee subtracts credibility from this paper.

Click Here! (bit old)

Inhofe has been ridiculed by the scientific community. Do not cite him.
 
Last edited:
Pinu7 said:
A really partisan report from a really biased senator and his committee subtracts credibility from this paper.

Click Here! (bit old)

Inhofe has been ridiculed by the scientific community. Do not cite him.
Click to expand...

Do not cite Inhofe!!

Is there an AGW counter we CAN cite? I have a feeling the answer is "no, they've all been debunked".
 
MrVicchio said:
Do not cite Inhofe!!

Is there an AGW counter we CAN cite? I have a feeling the answer is "no, they've all been debunked".
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

Five years tops, if you're still a denier, it will be like defending smoking.
 
rebelbuc said:
You are the regurgitator... if all solar minimums are equal why did the little ice age occur during the extended Maunder minimum? Your so-called peer (IPCC) reviewed papers deserve no more clout than some very valid peer reviewed papers as those MrVicchio introduced. The peer groups might not be government funded "scientists", but they include some brilliant, decent, honest scientists.
Click to expand...
:fyi: Vic did not cite a peer review paper - neither have you.
As for the Maunder minimum, we've already true debated that. I've already responded to you as to why it's irrelevant.
Where have I cited the IPCC here, what is your obsession with the IPCC?
 
Last edited:
jfuh said:
Where have I cited the IPCC here, what is your obsession with the IPCC?
Click to expand...

Every juvenile conspiracy theory needs its Grand Conspirator.
 
MrVicchio said:
Inhofe > Jfuh.

Se ehow that works, his committee just TRASHES you and everything you push on here, the best you can do is attack him, not the work he compiles.
Click to expand...
:lamo, the desperation, so sad to see you as oblivious. Keep burying your head in the ground vic.
 
jfuh said:
:fyi: Vic did not cite a peer review paper - neither have you.
As for the Maunder minimum, we've already true debated that. I've already responded to you as to why it's irrelevant.
Where have I cited the IPCC here, what is your obsession with the IPCC?
Click to expand...

NO I cited a source that cites a **** ton of peer reviewed papers. But you dismiss it by saying "Inhofe lied!"

Really, that's all you are doing.
 
MrVicchio said:
NO I cited a source that cites a **** ton of peer reviewed papers. But you dismiss it by saying "Inhofe lied!"

Really, that's all you are doing.
Click to expand...
Did you even bother to read the cited sources?
 
jfuh said:
It's the data from what is cited by all peer review papers.
Click to expand...

Perfect. That's the answer I hoped you would give. Now I can quote you when you start bleating about data I post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom