- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,343
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
To me the graph seems to show a clear upward trend in the Ocean Heat Content Time Derivative up until the year 2000, when it starts to dip. Of course, it has dipped before, and risen higher, as the graph shows, so it may do so again, and what would align with the warming trend.
I had to edit the narrative to meet the length limitation, but if you go to the link you'll find the story of how previous cooling was adjusted out of existence. On the other hand, cooling starting in 2000 lines up pretty well with other data.
Plotting an equation for the data is not the same thing as "correcting" it, they didn't change the points they just drew an average, all of those graphs do that to try and show a trend, because if you just throw all the data points on the chart then it doesn't make any sense.
Regardless, even with the ocean cooling fully accounted for, the climate is still on a warming trend, overall.
Here is a research result
Pardon me while I wait for actual scientists who know what the **** they are talking about to call off the alarm.
apples =/= oranges
Kinda figured when I saw none of your graphs included temp.
"A new data analysis authored by three Belgian scientists (Dewitte et al., 2019) finds not only has there been more heat energy leaving than accumulating in the Earth’s climate system this century, but ocean heat content time derivative (OHCTD) has likewise been declining since the early 2000s."
So, not temperature. Your "ocean cooling" is something other than temp.
Got it.
It is the energy balance that drives temperature.
So it's not temperature and not technically "cooling". It's theoretical cooling. And you're putting graphs up intended to deceive and pretend it's real. I posted ocean temps by year. Ocean temperature is a fact. Can't be disputed. Not part of a model, a proxy or a coefficient. It's a measurement.
It's a measurement that you pretended was represented in your graphs under the heading "global ocean cooling". But we know, now, that those are not temp graphs... Don't we.
You intended to deceive.
The graphs and text are from the journal Remote Sensing. Are you unaware of their work?
Those graphs do not illustrate temperature. Temperature, the word, appears no where on any of your graphs. But that's what you're pretending they represent.
Don't play dumb. "Temperature" is in the paper's text.
None of your graphs are temperature. You pretend they are.
The graphs are clearly and accurately labeled. You have no point.
Your title is "cooling" and none of your graphs have temperature. That's deceit.
If the material is too difficult for you, I suggest you take some time to study and come back better prepared.
Remember, I'm the one with an education not you. MSc International Environmental Science. All you have are blogs and lies.
No, you apparently are not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?