ABERDEEN, Miss. — A Mississippi girl has died after her brother allegedly shot her in the head because she wouldn't hand over the controller of a video game.
WCBI-TV reported Sunday that Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell says the girl is dead.
Cantrell told local news outlets that the 9-year-old boy shot his 13-year-old sister in the back of the head. She was rushed to Le Bonheur's Children's Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, but didn't survive.
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/03/18/us/ap-us-sibling-shooting-video-game.html
Jesus, what an absolutely tragic story. Yet more evidence to suggest that, actually, your family is less safe with firearms in the house than without. A reminder that guns, (unlike swimming pools), have the potential to escalate situations in a deadly manner.
I wouldn't wish this on any parent (or child) in the world - but I sincerely hope that the parents are taking full responsibility for their negligence in leaving an unsecured firearm in their home.
Link is behind a paywall, so maybe this question I'm about to ask was answered in it.
Where the **** were their parents? And why the **** did a 13 year old have access to a gun?
Authorities say they don't yet know how the boy got the gun. The circumstances are still being investigated.
Their mother was in another room feeding lunch to other kids when it happened. Sheriff Cantrell said they aren't sure how the boy was able to access the gun. This case is under investigation. Sheriff Cantrell says he does not know what consequences the boy faces. He adds he has never had a case where a child shoots another child in that manner. We aren't sure if the boy is in custody or not.
Oh, weird, that doesn't seem to be the case for me?
Here, from the links:
Honestly that last statement worries me a bit. I blame the parents far more than I do a 9 year old boy having an argument with his sister.
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/03/18/us/ap-us-sibling-shooting-video-game.html
Jesus, what an absolutely tragic story. Yet more evidence to suggest that, actually, your family is less safe with firearms in the house than without. A reminder that guns, (unlike swimming pools), have the potential to escalate situations in a deadly manner.
I wouldn't wish this on any parent (or child) in the world - but I sincerely hope that the parents are taking full responsibility for their negligence in leaving an unsecured firearm in their home.
edit: Link appears to be behind a paywall for some so found a couple others:
Sheriff: Girl shot by boy dies
Girl Shot In The Head By Her Brother During Argument Over Video Game Controller
If history is any indicator, then thats fact...he would have.You're right. If the boy here didn't have access to a gun he would only have found a different weapon. He probably would have made a fertilizer bomb or drove a truck through her bedroom or something. These evil people always find a way
Drunken argument, ban debating under the influence.......
Oh the problems that would solve!!!Drunken argument, ban debating under the influence.......
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/03/18/us/ap-us-sibling-shooting-video-game.html
Jesus, what an absolutely tragic story. Yet more evidence to suggest that, actually, your family is less safe with firearms in the house than without. A reminder that guns, (unlike swimming pools), have the potential to escalate situations in a deadly manner.
I wouldn't wish this on any parent (or child) in the world - but I sincerely hope that the parents are taking full responsibility for their negligence in leaving an unsecured firearm in their home.
edit: Link appears to be behind a paywall for some so found a couple others:
Sheriff: Girl shot by boy dies
Girl Shot In The Head By Her Brother During Argument Over Video Game Controller
This a horrible story. But to open a thread pushing the anti gun agenda based on this event is dishonest.
If history is any indicator, then thats fact...he would have.
Out of touch? I just posted about a dozen links to murders committed with BBQ forks. FFS...Just how committed to your narrative are you?Why?
Firstly I just reported a story - I didn't mention anything about gun control (beyond pointing out guns are dangerous, which is fact based upon the story). You are the one who bought up gun control.
Secondly. Even if this was a gun control discussion, why would it be dishonest to discuss gun control in a thread about guns being misused? Sorry, you don't get to just dismiss rhetoric off-hand like that.
If there was a story about [insert hypothetical Democratic politician] eating babies, you would absolutely be in position to push an anti-[said politician] agenda in that thread.
Good lord. Let's summarize.
Nilly: If the boy here didn't have access to a gun he would only have found a different weapon. He probably would have made a fertilizer bomb or drove a truck through her bedroom or something. These evil people always find a way.
VanceMack: If history is any indicator, then thats fact...he would have.
How out of touch are you?
Link is behind a paywall, so maybe this question I'm about to ask was answered in it.
Where the **** were their parents? And why the **** did a 13 year old have access to a gun?
Out of touch? I just posted about a dozen links to murders committed with BBQ forks. FFS...Just how committed to your narrative are you?
Maybe its the video games themselves inspiring violence
Boy, 9, stabbed to death over video game - NY Daily News
Although that one was Tony Hawk Sakteboarding...so....
Why?
Firstly I just reported a story - I didn't mention anything about gun control (beyond pointing out guns are dangerous, which is fact based upon the story). You are the one who bought up gun control.
Secondly. Even if this was a gun control discussion, why would it be dishonest to discuss gun control in a thread about guns being misused? Sorry, you don't get to just dismiss rhetoric off-hand like that.
If there was a story about [insert hypothetical Democratic politician] eating babies, you would absolutely be in position to push an anti-[said politician] agenda in that thread.
When you open your thread using one tragic story involving a gun that should have been secured well out of reach of any child, "Yet more evidence to suggest that, actually, your family is less safe with firearms in the house than without." you assume that ALL gun owners with small children are as irresponsible with guns as this family obviously was....It is a dishonest premise.
No...YOU made the idiotic fertilizer bomb comment but I thought you were smart enough to udnerstand that the response to your comment is that he would have used whatever he had at his disposal. No? Do you REALLY need me to spell every comment out for you?You literally just said that it's fact that a 9 year old boy would build a goddamn fertilizer bomb to kill his 13 year old sister for hogging a video game controller. And I'm the one committed to my narrative??? Spare me.
No...YOU made the idiotic fertilizer bomb comment but I thought you were smart enough to udnerstand that the response to your comment is that he would have used whatever he had at his disposal. No? Do you REALLY need me to spell every comment out for you?
Here are your options.
1-Little Timmy is a wonderful doscile young lad innocently playing video games, when the gun called to him from the other room and placed a magic spell on him, causing him, against his will, to go, find the gun, get the gun, and kill his sister.
2-Without a gun in his home, little Timmy, the same kid that got violently angry enough to kill his sister, would ahve just sat ther calmly.
3-Little Timmy, without a gun in his home, got violently angry and smashed his sister in the head witha firepalce poker because Little Timmy obviously has 'issues'.
Which do you think is most likely?
People commit fatal violent crimes all the time. You arent stupid enough to believe this kid would have just calmly sat there if there wasnt a gun in the house. I know you arent that stupid. SO...knowing that, and knowing he would have lashed out violently and potentially fatally regardless...what exactly is your point? Oh yeah. You want to ignore reality and say "See? Guns!"
Huh. Maybe I'm wrong about the whole capacity thing.......
I'd pump the brakes on 'evil'. We definitely could stand to know more about the kid. Hell...there might even be something to learn in all of this. 9 year olds dont have the most self control. I'd like to know more about the family, the circumstances, and yes...about the gun and where it was stored. Id say there is an opportunity to learn. Id say there may also be liability on the part of the parent. However...I dont think the availability of a firearm would have prevented the 9 year old from attacking...I just think it would have changed the means.The kid is obviously an evil little bastard. Everyone knows not to kill people at 9 years old.
You're completely ignoring the key statement "Yet more evidence to suggest that".
And my statement is perfectly justified - this incident is evidence that households are safer without guns than with. A single data point but still. I never made any sweeping statements about ALL gun owners.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?