• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gettysburg[W:176]


link? the latest download of Wikipedia, usually wins.

A withdrawal is a type of military operation, generally meaning retreating forces back while maintaining contact with the enemy.
 

This looks like a long thread on one of my favorite subjects, so I think I will stick to answering the OP and continuing from there.

1. When it comes to any "great" historical figure you have to look at both the entire body of his/her works, as well as the spin machine both of his time and afterward. You also have to remember that Lee was a risk-taker...and in the case of Gettysburg, his risks did not pan out as he hoped.

2. That is a question that has been debated ever since and the best answer I can give is "shoulda, woulda, couldas and a buck might buy you a cup of coffee". Nothing is certain when it comes to a battle of that scale.

3. Just like question 2...fun to speculate but pointless in fact.
 

In my opinion, there was not adequate artillery support for the confederate assault force.
 
this thread would have been a better read, but frivolous right wing spammed it with their uselessness.

This thread would have been a better read, but frivolous danielpalos spammed it with their uselessness.

lol. back to the reserve.

You have nothing but fallacy not any valid rebuttals.

under an authorized midget anaconda strategy;

Buford was dismounted cavalry, not dis-mounted infantry. An extra brigade should have been assigned through midget anaconda.

i am not the one whining i am too inferior to maneuver an argument before a superior force.

A midget anaconda plan would be a completely additional strategy.
 

lol. Yes, and you had nothing but fallacy and no questions you could continue any rational line of reasoning with.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…