Martin case is done...Over, fini! And it has NO bearing on this case.
only in the very broadest of terms. Given the publicity over the Zimmerman case, you could accuse him of practically anything and there would be people who would believe it.
In general, simply making a false accusation is not "framing" someone. coordinating/cooperating with someone else to make false accusations would be an attempt at framing, planting/faking evidence would be framing
to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false evidence, information, etc.
Martin case is done...Over, fini! And it has NO bearing on this case.
There was no need to coordinate and cooperate with anyone - if she did falsely accuse Zimmerman---the "accomplices" would be the public who would willingly believe.
I think what the person said initially was pretty accurate. Either he did it or the girl is trying to "frame him". Her secondary gain would have been either retribution or 15 minutes of fame and a bit of cash for interviews.
Actually, from dictionary.com
Seems pretty spot on.
What part didnt you understand?
mak2 said:I cannot possibly know what you think, so why do you ask?
I honestly dont know which post I liked and dont care enough to go look. But if it is about Conservatives and birtherism, I suspect most dont beleive, but nearly all want to so bad...
j-mac said:Because you liked a post where Verax was generalizing that all conservatives were birthers....So, If you agreed with that then you must know what I think....Or maybe you just like calling conservatives names....
I don't believe that for a second....You responded immediately, and it was in the course of a current conversation, so you know, you just now when being called on it, are squirming....
Oh, so now a generalization of your very own....Gheeze, when handed a shovel, you just keep digging....What do you mean, "all want to so bad"?
j-mac said:I see you won't go near the question though....So carry on.
I want every one to see just how dishonest you are here....The quote you posted from you:
And the quote I posted for that was this:
NOT THIS:
So now you add misrepresentation to your hole....Care to answer the question? Here I'll even ask it again for you, ready?
QUESTION: What do you mean, "all want to so bad"?
But...during the trial, even made up pictures were considered evidence by the right...just pointing out yet another double standard.
Well, to express a double standard...it is pretty on point.
Actually it is getting to the point you are becoming more boring then I was before I started responding to your post.
and, using those terms and conditions...the birthers accusations against Obama would also be considered an attempt at "framing". which was my point.
Possibly, except no one in their right mind actually would believe the birthers. So it would be a feeble attempt at framing. :lamo
The only ones I see bringing up the birther issue anymore are progressives that want to obfuscate..:shrug: I guess that is only appropriate since it was Hillary Clinton that originally hatched the complaint in the first place....:devil:
Nope, not even relevant....This is not the Martin case....That one is done.
Yes, and when it was resonably proven he was born in US I forgot about it and moved on. A significant portion of the US conservatives did not.
Sorry, as long as there is a search function, you may be accountable to your words - which may include being called on hypocrisy and double standard.
This is not about the Martin case - it is about double standard and hypocrisy.
sure: an accusation doesn't amount to an attempt to frame a person. it's an accusation. Framing someone requires intent, methods, and actions to make someone falsely appear involved in a crime. Second, there is no "felony" theshhold to framing someone. it's a distinction you made up purely out of conveniance
Wow, I don't even think you know how utterly dishonest that this post from you is....
Let me try it this way....
Do you believe that I think Obama was born in Kenya?
Is there anything in this thread that makes you think that I am supporting Zimmerman in this?
Answer those two then we can move on....
You too mak2....large on 'liking'.....
The only ones I see bringing up the birther issue anymore are progressives that want to obfuscate..:shrug: I guess that is only appropriate since it was Hillary Clinton that originally hatched the complaint in the first place....:devil:
Wow I didn't realize using a certain word was such a high caliber issue.
lack of understanding and misrepresentation seems to be your forte. No one is talking about Obama being from Kenya. We are talking about false accusations
Why not? That is the progressive model for modern debate....Pin the words of your opponent to them, and don't let them escape them, while your own words should be parsed to leave yourself an out....Didn't realize....yeah right! :roll:
Yeah I'm a one man disinformation campaign. I used the word "framed" and you guys all lost your mind and labeled me a monster, the horror. :roll:
The point is your boy killer is a thug rather than the other way around.
And the funny thin is if Zimmerman did not aim the gun at her ....then she did frame Zimmerman.
They should like that their neighborhood hero didn't turn out to be the unstable individual that others were claiming him to be.
I like how some are convinced of his guilt because of his involvement in another case they disagree with. It is sad that the court of public opinion is so stupid. I guess we shouldn't wait for a court case on this should we?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?