Did not know you could fit so many lies and homophobic content into a single post.
I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teenagers-oppose-gay-marriage-and-shun-tattoos-f2rf0td0b
Younger teenagers sceptical about gay marriage and trans movement, study claims | CatholicHerald.co.uk
As a researcher who keeps up with the trends and social changes in the modern and post-modern world, this is rather interesting: support for the "LGBT" subculture and trans "rights" seems to be dying out among the youngest and most web-savvy generation, with opposition to "LGBT" likely to become the prevailing social norm in the near future.
I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.
I'd venture that it might be better for the more evolved members of society just to let the underclass and evolutionary ineffectuals voluntarily quarantine themselves, and let their myriad of diseases - and lack of any reproductive ability - run their evolutionary course if they choose to perpetuate it.
Given that their sexual problems and identity disorders are arguably less a "disease" and more just a symptom of the trashy and diseased lifestyles that such individuals are prone to as a whole, having coincidentally gone hand-in hand with obesity, chain smoking, and other degenerative lifestyle choices:
https://truthinitiative.org/news/why-are-smoking-rates-higher-lgbt-communities
Among older LGBT adults, 9 percent have HIV disease. Cancer is reported in 19 percent of older LGBT adults, including 16 percent of lesbians, 20 percent of bisexual women, 21 percent of gay men, 24 percent of bisexual men and 16 percent of transgender older adults.
Cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for bisexual men than for gay men, according to SAMHSA. Older transgender adults have higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, asthma and diabetes than other adults, but significantly lower rates of cataracts, and hepatitis.
No, that study is about "gay couples", not members of the "LGBT cult".A fact that that destroys your whole argument is that LGBT people are more likely to have higher education and higher incomes than the general population.
No, that study is about "gay couples", not members of the "LGBT cult".
Not all "gay couples" are members of the NAMBLA-endorsing LGBT cult - at least not anymore than "all Muslims" are members of ISIS.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teenagers-oppose-gay-marriage-and-shun-tattoos-f2rf0td0b
Younger teenagers sceptical about gay marriage and trans movement, study claims | CatholicHerald.co.uk
As a researcher who keeps up with the trends and social changes in the modern and post-modern world, this is rather interesting: support for the "LGBT" subculture and trans "rights" seems to be dying out among the youngest and most web-savvy generation, with opposition to "LGBT" likely to become the prevailing social norm in the near future.
I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.
I'd venture that it might be better for the more evolved members of society just to let the underclass and evolutionary ineffectuals voluntarily quarantine themselves, and let their myriad of diseases - and lack of any reproductive ability - run their evolutionary course if they choose to perpetuate it.
Given that their sexual problems and identity disorders are arguably less a "disease" and more just a symptom of the trashy and diseased lifestyles that such individuals are prone to as a whole, having coincidentally gone hand-in hand with obesity, chain smoking, and other degenerative lifestyle choices:
https://truthinitiative.org/news/why-are-smoking-rates-higher-lgbt-communities
Among older LGBT adults, 9 percent have HIV disease. Cancer is reported in 19 percent of older LGBT adults, including 16 percent of lesbians, 20 percent of bisexual women, 21 percent of gay men, 24 percent of bisexual men and 16 percent of transgender older adults.
Cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for bisexual men than for gay men, according to SAMHSA. Older transgender adults have higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, asthma and diabetes than other adults, but significantly lower rates of cataracts, and hepatitis.
No, that study is about "gay couples", not members of the "LGBT cult".
Not all "gay couples" are members of the NAMBLA-endorsing LGBT cult - at least not anymore than "all Muslims" are members of ISIS.
Most "gay people" do not identify with the LGBT cult or involve themselves with politics - the LGBT movement is just a cult that preys on the mentally ill and lowest-functioning members of society, and actively recruits them into the so-called "lifestyle" merely to serve its own ends.
That would be rather incorrect - I spew my "hate", err facts, wherever I damn well please, without any repercussion, at all:Now now, you've been here on DP for 6 years, yes you did. These people and their bigoted beliefs have been so shunned and rejected by society that the only place they have to spew their hate without repercussions is internet forums.
Yes, and they also have a right to make it harder for those who choose poorly.Good, then you shouldn't worry your little head about it. Everyone has the right to live their lives as they choose. Also, on a side note, you definitely strike me as juggalo who would go to an ICP concert with his face painted up.
So what exactly is this LGBT cult then? Since it apparently does not include any actual LGBT people.
Any census data to back up your claims?
That would be rather incorrect - I spew my hate wherever I damn well please, without any repercussion, at all:
And if the overwhelming negative reaction to, say Youtube's latest "ProudToBe" campaign is any indication
I think the LGBT Cult is a weekly meetup he has. They drink community cool-aid and talk about how much they hate gays.
The reality is LGBT rights are here to stay and no amount of you whining on internet forums is going to change that. If you want to attack others' rights maybe you shouldn't have any yourself.
I think this person is viewing LGBT as a political party and not an amalgam of lesbians gays bisexuals and transgenders.
Point is "LGBT people" is a social construct - the actual research such as by Kinsey and company has stated that "same-sex attraction" is fluid and on a spectrum.So what exactly is this LGBT cult then? Since it apparently does not include any actual LGBT people.
Any census data to back up your claims?
You think I'm defending something? How so?I was wondering when the right's token Uncle Tom was going to show up and defend the person calling you a disease, degenerate and a cult member.
You think I'm defending something? How so?
I guess civility is too much to ask.
As I pointed out, the LGBT movement is more or less a cult that actively preys on children and tries to brainwash them into the diseased "lifestyle", and has been documented having openly embraced pedophile organizations like NAMBLA:
[/i]
Point is "LGBT people" is a social construct - the actual research such as by Kinsey and company has stated that "same-sex attraction" is fluid and on a spectrum.
This means identifying as "LGBT" is a choice - most "gay people" don't identify with the LGBT movement or attend "pride rallies" to begin with. "Homosexuality" has always existed, but the invention of the "LGBT identity" is a recent invention.
As I pointed out, the LGBT movement is more or less a cult that actively preys on children and tries to brainwash them into the diseased "lifestyle", and has been documented having openly embraced pedophile organizations like NAMBLA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association#ILGA_controversy
So no, you took it as me saying that anyone who had had same-sex feelings shouldn't be allowed to exist - that wasn't what I'm saying. I'm saying that the "LGBT movement" shouldn't exist, since it's really just a cult which preys on sexually confused people and children who lack a sense of identity and uses them to further perverse agendas.
Well no, they're not necessarily - if you believe that, then that's quaint, but unless you have counter-evidence to back up the study which shows that the Generation Z is more anti-LGBT than the previous generations, then one could easily postulate that LGBT "rights" will be repealed and disappear like they never existed.I think the LGBT Cult is a weekly meetup he has. They drink community cool-aid and talk about how much they hate gays.
The reality is LGBT rights are here to stay and no amount of you whining on internet forums is going to change that. If you want to attack others' rights maybe you shouldn't have any yourself.
I never said that all people who may have identified as "gay" at some point in their life are diseased.Because the OP has very clearly called ALL LGBT diseased, degenerate cult members and you're pretend it's just the liberal political wing of the LGBT community he was attacking. I mean ****, I'm not going to tell you who to defend, I just think it's hilarious that's what you're going with.
Honestly I had to laugh when I read this yes LGBT is a societal construct. Groups of people getting together and petitioning for equal treatment which is how the LGBT started is absolutely social.Point is "LGBT people" is a social construct - the actual research such as by Kinsey and company has stated that "same-sex attraction" is fluid and on a spectrum.
well yes of course it is just like identifying is Catholic or republican is a choice.This means identifying as "LGBT" is a choice
well yes the LGBT is a political coalition that formed in the 60s.most "gay people" don't identify with the LGBT movement or attend "pride rallies" to begin with. "Homosexuality" has always existed, but the invention of the "LGBT identity" is a recent invention.
you keep saying it's a cult but I don't think that word means what you think it means.As I pointed out, the LGBT movement is more or less a cult that actively preys on children and tries to brainwash them into the diseased "lifestyle", and has been documented having openly embraced pedophile organizations like NAMBLA:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teenagers-oppose-gay-marriage-and-shun-tattoos-f2rf0td0b
Younger teenagers sceptical about gay marriage and trans movement, study claims | CatholicHerald.co.uk
As a researcher who keeps up with the trends and social changes in the modern and post-modern world, this is rather interesting: support for the "LGBT" subculture and trans "rights" seems to be dying out among the youngest and most web-savvy generation, with opposition to "LGBT" likely to become the prevailing social norm in the near future.
I'm personally not sure it's worth society's time to "oppose" it, since the "LGBT" cult never amounted to much to begin with - having been more or less comprised of a minority of less educated and socially maladjusted Boomers and Millennials - who one would expect to find a low-rent Los Angeles trailer park or "Insane Clown Posse" concert than they would at library, health food store, or classical music venue to begin with.
I'd venture that it might be better for the more evolved members of society just to let the underclass and evolutionary ineffectuals voluntarily quarantine themselves, and let their myriad of diseases - and lack of any reproductive ability - run their evolutionary course if they choose to perpetuate it.
Given that their sexual problems and identity disorders are arguably less a "disease" and more just a symptom of the trashy and diseased lifestyles that such individuals are prone to as a whole, having coincidentally gone hand-in hand with obesity, chain smoking, and other degenerative lifestyle choices:
https://truthinitiative.org/news/why-are-smoking-rates-higher-lgbt-communities
Among older LGBT adults, 9 percent have HIV disease. Cancer is reported in 19 percent of older LGBT adults, including 16 percent of lesbians, 20 percent of bisexual women, 21 percent of gay men, 24 percent of bisexual men and 16 percent of transgender older adults.
Cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for bisexual men than for gay men, according to SAMHSA. Older transgender adults have higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, asthma and diabetes than other adults, but significantly lower rates of cataracts, and hepatitis.
you misunderstood. I was explaining how he was using the term. I said nothing in regards to the position.Because the OP has very clearly called ALL LGBT diseased, degenerate cult members and you're pretend it's just the liberal political wing of the LGBT community he was attacking.
I'm telling you I did not defend him. You misread.I mean ****, I'm not going to tell you who to defend, I just think it's hilarious that's what you're going with.
In some ways it is, but from what I've seen the youngest, internet savvy generation which has grown up more with "internet memes" and rejected the "SJW" subculture or whatnot, seems to be more skeptical of it.I'm sure these teens feel like this in Catholic schools but in the brain washed liberal public school system the gay life style is heavily promoted.
This article was about Generation Z, those born after the year 2000 - not "millennials". The trend seems to show that Generation Z is more skeptical of the "LGBT narrative" than those previous.Nah -- that doesn't appear to be accurate.
I'm sure these teens feel like this in Catholic schools but in the brain washed liberal public school system the gay life style is heavily promoted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?