- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The Weekly Substandard writes a hit piece on the Obama Administration? Stunned I tell you!
Kristol needs some attention does he?
The next time Kristol is right about something will be the first. Guy is a total garden tool.
Do you know you're following the directions of Saul Alinsky by damning the messenger rather than debating the message or do you just follow this course through habit?
You're referring to WMD assertions as 'one lie?' LMAO. All that 'one lie' did was justify a war that will cost trillions, kill a few thousand troops, injure 100s of thousands of others, and result in 100s of thousands of deaths of Iraqis and others in the ME.
Why did they stop at just 65??
Jasper, whatever lie to which votemout referred couldn't possibly have anything to do with the Iraq war. Not if you listen to this...what all these democrats had to say BEFORE the war...and eagerly supported by congressional resolution to go into Iraq after Saddam Hussein. Right?
Of course, AFTER the fact...they DENIED, denied, denied supporting it. Please watch...
Alinsky! Everybody drink!
I'm not the one who said the WH told him to lie. He is.
Believe me when i say the most elite you do not know their names.
Seems like this is pretty innocuous, all things considered. Silly way to play Gotcha.
Please tell me you are just saying that, and deep down you really rather have honest government.
Anyone who thinks we're told the truth, or ever will be told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth from our government is living in wonderland.
Would I rather our government was always truthful? No, not really. I've got enough to worry about.
How many of the Democrats with posts on that page voted for the invasion of Iraq?
Look lets just admit they work together and only try to divide the voters
And Geithner is a butt kisser of the plutocrats now selling a book. If he's claiming now, or then, that at that point in history SS was a 'contributor to the deficit' he's taking an elitist view of the issue that disregards the trillions then sitting in the SS 'trust fund' - that's the amount SS had REDUCED the debt those guys kissing bankers' and the CEO class rear ends are now so worried about.
If "they" means Republicans and Democrats, there is NOTHING to disagree with BEFORE the war began. After the war started is when the lies began on the part of the honorable, uh dishonorable democrats in that video.
The Weekly Standard is an American neoconservative[2][3][4][5][6] opinion magazine[7] published 48 times per year. Its founding publisher, News Corporation, debuted the title September 18, 1995. Currently edited by founder William Kristol and Fred Barnes, the Standard has been described as a "redoubt of neoconservatism" and as "the neo-con bible".[8][9] Since it was founded in 1995, the Weekly Standard has never been profitable, and has remained in business through subsidies from conservative benefactors such as former owner Rupert Murdoch.[10] Many of the magazine's articles are written by members of conservative think tanks located in Washington, D.C.: the American Enterprise Institute, the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and the Hudson Institute. Some individuals who have written for the magazine include Elliott Abrams, Peter Berkowitz, John R. Bolton, Ellen Bork, Christopher Hitchens, Roger Kimball, Harvey Mansfield, Joe Queenan, David Brooks and John Yoo.
Thats what happens when you don't tell Congress that the primary source of your "intelligence" is a known pathological liar making drunk phone calls to a German embassy and whom your allies have told you is a raving lunatic. How many of the Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, would have voted for the war had they known that the source was the looney tune codenamed "Curveball"?
Cough, cough, mission accomplished, cough, cough, WMD, cough, cough...
How much would you care to wager that if HRC is the democrat nominee you will PROUDLY vote for her?You're referring to WMD assertions as 'one lie?' LMAO. All that 'one lie' did was justify a war that will cost trillions, kill a few thousand troops, injure 100s of thousands of others, and result in 100s of thousands of deaths of Iraqis and others in the ME.
When did World War 2 end? Would you say the end of World War 2 was when the opponents we were fighting were defeated or when our troops were no longer on the ground?Cough, cough, mission accomplished, cough, cough, WMD, cough, cough...
How much would you care to wager that if HRC is the democrat nominee you will PROUDLY vote for her?
Guess what her position was on Saddam and WMDs...both long BEFORE George Bush became president and after...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?