Trump lied about the 2020 election, fomenting violence and trying to disenfranchise 81m Americans. It was Republicans marching in Charlottesville. It was Republicans beating on cops. The latter was in effort to steal an election.Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
MAGA literally wanted to hang the vice president, yet that is a kindergarten sandboxJan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
Are they counting on them being stupid or likely to carry the message?According to the FoxNews and Zero Hedge articles I've read, the only thing the "evidence" so far shows is that the intelligence community did not think, months before the election, that Russia had the capability to hack voting systems for the purpose of changing votes. Which no one has ever claimed they did. But of course those articles immediately suggest this discredits everything about the Mueller investigation. They count on their audiences being stupid and believing what they've been conditioned to believe.
No one is upset because this is just bullshit. Trump has been revealed as a child predator, so it's time to wave the black guy at the base, remind everyone why they're here in the first place.
Nope. Trump has a history of being a creepy sexual predator. And owes E Jean Carroll 90m for lying about raping her. And he's fantasized about ****ing Ivanka - remember when Stormy said he told her she reminded him of his daughter prior to ****ing her?Ya think maybe these PRESENT claims by Democrats of Trumo are of the same magnitude of "bullshit" as these PAST claims?
You're right in the sense that Trump's attempt to deny the results of the 2020 election was very poorly managed. It's not that Trump has any qualms about lying to advance his goals. He's just not very good at it.Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
Actually, I said "as bad or worse," so we are mostly in agreement with our opinions.Isn't that a subjective assessment though? Which lies were "worse" is purely a matter of opinion. I prefer to write off both sides as being equally dishonest, manipulative, and untrustworthy. Basically, don't believe anything either of them say.
Which is a greater risk to the country, a President with swollen ankles or a President cognitively impaired?Impact to the nation - lying about the President being healthiest ever and less than 6 months later its revealed his swollen ankles mean he has serious health issues is not an impact on the nation?
Lucky for us, Trump has both.Which is a greater risk to the country, a President with swollen ankles or a President cognitively impaired?
Up early to beat traffic on the way to the fishin' hole?The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.
——————————————-
"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."
“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”
“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”
“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."
Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Nope. Trump has a history of being a creepy sexual predator. And owes E Jean Carroll 90m for lying about raping her. And he's fantasized about ****ing Ivanka - remember when Stormy said he told her she reminded him of his daughter prior to ****ing her?
And everything Dems claimed about Trump turned out to be true.
THen Trump probably shouldn't have cheated on his pregnant wife with her.Quoting a professional escort ain't the way to do it.
THen Trump probably shouldn't have cheated on his pregnant wife with her.
Anything to distract from the deception they spoon fed to you, huh? Whatabout over to Twump, lol.
Same involved with Crossfire Hurricane involved in orchastrating the 2020 election and January 6. Obama brought home the regime change skill set honed by our IC.Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
The delusional will believeThey are coming.
What if a president has both conditions?Which is a greater risk to the country, a President with swollen ankles or a President cognitively impaired?
I'd say the former pales in comparison to the latter.What if a president has both conditions?
How does it make you feel to being the victim of such atrocious propaganda by your party leaders and government agencies? They lied and you fell for it.
Most of this was because Mueller realized he could not prosecute a sitting president anyway, so why bother with a more detailed investigation. That's not the absence of evidence you think it means.Didn't miss it, suppressed it. Mueller never said Trump was guilty, never said he wasn't. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report did not make a definitive determination.
generated by AI
- Collusion: The report found insufficient evidence to conclude that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to influence the 2016 election. However, the report did detail that the Trump campaign "expected it would benefit electorally" from Russian hacking efforts and that there were "numerous links" between the campaign and the Russian government.
- Obstruction of Justice: Mueller investigated multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice by President Trump but ultimately decided not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment on whether a crime was committed.
- No Exoneration: While the report did not conclude that Trump committed a crime, it also explicitly stated that it "does not exonerate him".
- Evidence Presented: The report laid out evidence on both sides of the obstruction question and left unresolved the "difficult issues" of law and fact concerning whether the president's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.
- Department of Justice Policy: The Special Counsel's office accepted the Department of Justice policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
- Barr's Conclusion: Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that the evidence presented in the report was not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Where are the insurrection charges (or at the very least incoting violence charges ) against Trump?Where are the criminal charges? It's Trump's DoJ. You should demand that your leaders stop whining to the media and bring criminal charges. Put up or shut up.
Otherwise it kinda looks like they're just trying to manipulate you.
Thus Spake TylerDurden.The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.
——————————————-
"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."
“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”
“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”
“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."
Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?